This adds back the instanceof operator support in the backends and
introduces a @@hasInstance protector cell on the isolate that guards the
fast path for the InstanceOfStub. This way we recover the ~10%
regression on Octane EarleyBoyer in Crankshaft and greatly improve
TurboFan and Ignition performance of instanceof.
R=ishell@chromium.orgTBR=hpayer@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:597249, v8:4447
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1980483003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36275}
Unlike previous implementation where the 'continue' keyword was a feature of a return statement the keyword is now recognized as a part of expression. Error reporting was significantly improved.
--harmony-explicit-tailcalls option is now orthogonal to --harmony-tailcalls so we can test both modes at the same time.
This CL also adds %GetExceptionDetails(exception) that fetches hidden |start_pos| and |end_pos| values from the exception object.
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1928203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36024}
Compiler backends get their language mode from the current
function, but should instead be deriving it from the current scope.
This allows proper handling of the always-strictness of class declarations
and expressions, and in particular the treatment of 'eval' calls in an
extends clause as a strict eval.
Also fix the parser's RecordEvalCall logic to only reach out to the
DeclarationScope in sloppy mode, which fixes the strange case of a
sloppy function thinking it contains a sloppy eval when in fact
it contains only a strict eval.
BUG=v8:4970
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1931003003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36001}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
Restrict the use of the `await` token as an identifier when parsing
source text as module code.
From
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-future-reserved-words:
> 11.6.2.2 Future Reserved Words
>
> The following tokens are reserved for used as keywords in future
> language extensions.
>
> Syntax
>
> FutureReservedWord ::
> enum
> await
>
> await is only treated as a FutureReservedWord when Module is the goal
> symbol of the syntactic grammar.
BUG=v8:4767
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1723313002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35914}
The first version of --harmony-for-in avoided throwing PreParser
errors in order to retain use counting. This patch threads
use_counts_ through to the PreParser to allow use counting in
the PreParser while also throwing errors for this case.
Also slightly refactored the Parser code to do a little less
code duplication.
BUG=v8:4942
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1913203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35780}
ES#sec-islabelledfunction specifies that labelled function declarations
may not occur as the body of a control flow construct such as an if
statement. This patch implements those restrictions, which also
eliminates a previous case resulting in a DCHECK failure which is now
a SyntaxError.
BUG=chromium:595309
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1808373003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35049}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
We don't want them to disappear from the stack traces.
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1818063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34957}
Modules already have a separate entrypoint into the engine (at the moment,
this is v8::ScriptCompiler::CompileModule, though that will change to
something like ParseModule). This meant that requiring a commandline flag
simply added an extra complexity burden on embedders. By removing the v8
flag, this lets embedders use their own flagging mechanism (such as d8's
"--module", or Blink's RuntimeEnabledFeatures) to control whether
modules are to be used.
Also remove old modules tests that were being skipped (since they test
very old, pre-ES2015 modules syntax).
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569, chromium:594639
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804693002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34764}
Now that the destructuring flags are gone, we always call
CheckAndRewriteReferenceExpression, so unified the two methods again.
Also cleaned up the code within, e.g. removing unnecessary Scanner::Location
construction.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1781933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34699}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
This mechanism was used to ensure that functions ended up as constants on the map of prototypes defined using object literals, e.g.,:
function.prototype = {
method: function() { ... }
}
Nowadays we treat prototypes specially, and make all their functions constants when an object turns prototype. Hence this special custom code isn't necessary anymore.
This also affects boilerplates that do not become prototypes. Their functions will not be constants but fields instead. Calling their methods will slow down. However, multiple instances of the same boilerplate will stay monomorphic. We'll have to see what the impact is for such objects, but preliminary benchmarks do not show this as an important regression.
BUG=chromium:593008
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1772423002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34602}
Now there is just one kind, corresponding to what was called "initial" before.
Replacement for "suspend": when the parser sees a yield in JS code, it
will turn it into a Yield node but wrap its argument in an iterator result
object. Replacement for "final": the parser simply inserts a return statement
instead.
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1751613004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34515}
ES2015 generally bans FunctionDeclarations in positions which expect a Statement,
as opposed to a StatementListItem, such as a FunctionDeclaration which constitutes
the body of a for loop. However, Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 make exceptions for labeled
function declarations and function declarations as the body of an if statement in
sloppy mode, in the latter case specifying that the semantics are as if the
function declaration occurred in a block. Chrome has historically permitted
further extensions, for the body of any flow control construct.
This patch addresses both the syntactic and semantic mismatches between V8 and
the spec. For the semantic mismatch, function declarations as the body of if
statements change from unconditionally hoisting in certain cases to acquiring
the sloppy mode function in block semantics (based on Annex B 3.3). For the
extra syntax permitted, this patch adds a flag,
--harmony-restrictive-declarations, which excludes disallowed function declaration
cases. A new UseCounter, LegacyFunctionDeclaration, is added to count how often
function declarations occur as the body of other constructs in sloppy mode. With
this patch, the code generally follows the form of the specification with respect
to parsing FunctionDeclarations, rather than allowing them in arbitrary Statement
positions, and makes it more clear where our extensions occur.
BUG=v8:4647
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1757543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34470}
of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
design document. Details to be provided here.
1. RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
(that may or may not happen). Also, Is... and As... macros now see
through RewritableExpressions.
2. The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.
3. Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
traits. They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
non-pattern rewritable expressions. It is important that expression
classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.
4. The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.
BUG=chromium:579913
LOG=N
Committed: https://crrev.com/7f5c864a6faf2b957b7273891e143b9bde35487c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1702063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34162}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] This makes jsfunfuzz unhappy:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Fuzzer/builds/7681
Original issue's description:
> This patch implements an alternative approach to the rewriting
> of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
> design document. Details to be provided here.
>
> 1. RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
> It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
> (that may or may not happen). Also, Is... and As... macros now see
> through RewritableExpressions.
>
> 2. The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
> rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.
>
> 3. Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
> traits. They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
> non-pattern rewritable expressions. It is important that expression
> classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.
>
> 4. The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.
>
> BUG=chromium:579913
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/7f5c864a6faf2b957b7273891e143b9bde35487c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,nikolaos@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:579913
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1712203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34158}
of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
design document. Details to be provided here.
1. RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
(that may or may not happen). Also, Is... and As... macros now see
through RewritableExpressions.
2. The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.
3. Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
traits. They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
non-pattern rewritable expressions. It is important that expression
classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.
4. The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.
BUG=chromium:579913
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1702063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}
Various syntactic forms now cause functions to have names where they
didn't before. Per the upcoming changes to the toString spec, only
a name that was literally part of a function's expression or declaration
is meant to be reflected in toString. This also happens to be the same
set of names that V8 currently outputs (without the --harmony-function-name
flag).
This required distinguishing anonymous FunctionExpressions from other sorts
of function definitions (like methods and getters/setters) in the AST, parser,
and at runtime.
The patch also takes the opportunity to remove one more argument (and enum)
from FunctionLiteral, as well as adding a special factory method for the
case of a FunctionLiteral representing toplevel or eval'd code.
BUG=v8:4760
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1712833002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34132}
This frees up one bit in FunctionKind, which I plan to make slightly
more syntactic info about functions available in SharedFunctionInfo
(needed for ES2015 Function.name support).
BUG=v8:3956, v8:4760
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1704223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34125}
This is hopefully the last in a series of cleanup patches around
destructuring assignment. It simplifies the ParseAssignmentExpression
API, making the callers call CheckDestructuringElement() where appropriate.
CheckDestructuringElement has been further simplified to only emit the
errors that the parser depends on it emitting.
I've also beefed up the test coverage in test-parsing.cc to
handling all the destructuring flags being on, which caught an oddity
in how we disallow initializers in spreads in patterns (we need to treat
RewritableAssignmentExpressions as Assignments for the purpose of
error checking).
Finally, I added a few helper methods to ParserBase to handle a few
classes of expressions (assignments and literals-as-patterns).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1696603002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33961}
The path used by that option only comes into play when default parameters
are allowed but destructuring assignment is disallowed. Removing it
allows the removal of one implementation of ParseExpression, and makes
it clearer which code will be dead once all the destructuring flags
are removed.
Also made the |flags| param strongly typed instead of an int.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1691653002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33918}
Several minor cleanups to error handling in expression parsing:
- Remove duplication of binding and assignment error reporting.
- RecordBindingPatternError calls are changed to shorter BindingPatternUnexpectedToken
calls where possible.
- No-op error recording calls are removed.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1688833004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33915}
Instead of doing a full function body traversal we collect return expressions and mark them after function parsing.
And since we rewrite do-expressions so that the result is explicitly assigned to a result variable the statements marking will never hit so I removed it from the AST.
BUG=v8:4698
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1693523002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33911}
This bit was ostensibly being used to provide appropriate syntax
errors for invalid destructuring assignment patterns, but adding a
single call to RecordPatternError() (in place of
BindingPatternUnexpectedToken()) seems to have replaced the need for it.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1665043002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33750}
Also various related cleanup in ParseVariableDeclarations(). The only
changes in logic are explained below:
- We were redundantly checking for parenthesized binding patterns;
these are already ruled out by BindingPatternUnexpectedToken()
calls in the places where we hit an LPAREN.
- There's no need to default-initialize a LET-mode variable in a
for-each loop, just as there isn't for CONST or CONST_LEGACY
(ParseForStatement will take care of properly initializing all
of the above).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1661193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33749}
