- added InspectorTest.setupInjectedScriptEnvironment method which mutates current context,
- clear prototype of InjectedScript function and domAttributesWithObservableSideEffectOnGet.
Second point increases chances that injected-script-source would be successfully compiled.
BUG=chromium:693338
R=dgozman@chromium.org,luoe@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2770823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44081}
With precise binary code coverage, the reported count is either 0 or 1.
We only report 1 the first time we collect coverage data after the
function has been executed.
Since we do not care about the accurate execution count, we can optimize
the function once it has been executed once.
Also change best effort coverage to be implicitly binary.
R=caseq@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2766573003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44074}
With flag we can debug injected-script-source in inspector-test or from DevTools frontend as regular user code. We need this when working on new features or debugging issues, it's for internal purpose only and doesn't provide any benefits for end users.
Flag: --expose-inspector-scripts
BUG=none
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2767873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44039}
Indisputable profit:
- correct break location in next task (see tests),
- stepOver with async await never lands in random code (see related test and issue),
- inspector doesn't store current stepping state in debugger agent and completely trust V8 - step to new inspector-V8 design (I will finish design doc soon).
- willExecuteScript and didExecuteScript instrumentation could be removed from code base - reduce probability of future errors.
- finally - less code,
- stepping implementation in V8 makes another step to follow our stepping strategy (stepOut should do stepInto and break when exit current frame) (another one one page design doc based on @aandrey comment is coming),
- knowledge about existing of context groups is still inspector-only.
Disputable part is related to super rare scenario when in single isolate we have more then one context group id with enabled debugger agent:
- if one agent request break in own context (stepping, pause, e.t.c.) then we ignore all breaks in another agent. From one hand it looks like good: user clicks stepInto and they don't expect that execution could be paused by another instance of DevTools in unobservable from current DevTools way (second DevTools will get paused notification and run nested message loop). From another hand we shouldn't ignore breakpoints or debugger statement never. In general, I think that proposed behavior is rathe feature then issue.
- and disadvantage, on attempt to break in non-target context group id we just call StepOut until reach target context group id, step out call could deoptimize code in non related to current debugger agent context. But break could happens only in case of debugger stmt or breakpoint - sound like minor issue. Ignoring break on exception sounds like real issue but by module of rareness of this case I think we can ignore this.
Implementation details:
- when debugger agent request break for any reason it passes target context group id to V8Debugger - last agent requesting break is preferred.
- when V8Debugger gets BreakProgramRequested notification from V8, it checks current context group id against target context group id, if they match then just process break as usual otherwise makes StepOut action,
- debug.cc at the end of microtask if last_scheduled_action is StepOut, schedules StepIn and will break on first instruction in next task.
BUG=chromium:654022
R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2748503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44034}
Proposed behaviour:
- StepNext at return position go into next function call (no changes with current behavior, but implemented in v8::Debug instead of hack on inspector side);
- StepOut at return position go into next non-current function call.
We need this to have better stepping in cases with native functions, blackboxed functions and/or different embedder calls (e.g. event listeners).
New behavior could be illustrated with two examples (for more see stepping-with-natives-and-frameworks test):
- let's assume that we've blackboxed callAll function, this function just takes its arguments and call one after another:
var foo = () => 1;
callAll(foo, foo, () => 2);
If we break inside of first call of function foo. Then on..
..StepNext - we're able to reach second call of function foo,
..StepOut - we're able to reach () => 2 call.
- let's consider case with native function:
[1,2,3].map(x => x * 2)
If we break inside of first callback call, then with StepNext we can iterate through all calls of callback, with StepOut we go to next statement after .map call.
Implementation details:
- when we request break we schedule step-in function call for any step action at return position and for step-in at any position,
- when we request StepOut at return position - we mark current function as needed-to-be-ignored inside of PrepareStepIn(function) call,
- when we request StepOut at not return position - we set break at return position and ask debugger to just repeat last step action on next stepping-related break.
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ihXHOIhP_q-fJCA0e2EiXz_Zr3B08KMjaPifcaqZ60Q/edit
BUG=v8:6118,chromium:583193
R=dgozman@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2758483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44028}
We used to clear invocation counts when enabling precise coverage.
This is not necessary, and we could continue to use the existing
invocation counts on the heap. The old behavior can be achieved
by explicitly resetting the counts by polling coverage data.
R=jgruber@chromium.org,caseq@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2768453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43964}
Default to the chromium-internal build config (instead of the more
permissive no_chromium_code config).
BUG=v8:5878
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2758563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43909}
Reason for revert:
Still flaky
Original issue's description:
> Collect type profile for DevTools
>
> Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
> in Chrome DevTools.
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
>
> When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
> a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
> dynamically typed, and for complex
> source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
> can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
>
> This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
> assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
>
> The output looks something like this:
>
> #my_var1
> #Object
> #number
> #string
> #number
> #undefined
> #string
> #Object
> #Object
>
>
> We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
> carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
> only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
>
>
> Missing work:
> * Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
> * Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
> * Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
>
>
>
> BUG=v8:5935
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
> Committed: 0332bebde9
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
> Committed: 6cf880f4b8
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43846}
> Committed: 5c32287390
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43849}
> Committed: 18c35e4958TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2745413006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43852}
Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
Committed: 0332bebde9
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
Committed: 6cf880f4b8
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43846}
Committed: 5c32287390
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43849}
Reason for revert:
Flaky under stress. Fix first.
Original issue's description:
> Collect type profile for DevTools
>
> Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
> in Chrome DevTools.
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
>
> When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
> a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
> dynamically typed, and for complex
> source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
> can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
>
> This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
> assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
>
> The output looks something like this:
>
> #my_var1
> #Object
> #number
> #string
> #number
> #undefined
> #string
> #Object
> #Object
>
>
> We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
> carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
> only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
>
>
> Missing work:
> * Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
> * Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
> * Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
>
>
>
> BUG=v8:5935
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
> Committed: 0332bebde9
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
> Committed: 6cf880f4b8
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43846}
> Committed: 5c32287390TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2747383004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43847}
Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
Committed: 0332bebde9
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
Committed: 6cf880f4b8
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43846}
Reason for revert:
gcc bot is now flaky https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/11863
Original issue's description:
> Collect type profile for DevTools
>
> Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
> in Chrome DevTools.
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
>
> When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
> a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
> dynamically typed, and for complex
> source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
> can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
>
> This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
> assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
>
> The output looks something like this:
>
> #my_var1
> #Object
> #number
> #string
> #number
> #undefined
> #string
> #Object
> #Object
>
>
> We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
> carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
> only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
>
>
> Missing work:
> * Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
> * Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
> * Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
>
>
>
> BUG=v8:5935
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
> Committed: 0332bebde9
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
> Committed: 6cf880f4b8TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2754573002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43805}
Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
Committed: 0332bebde9
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43804}
Reason for revert:
gcc bot has problems with this: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/11858
Original issue's description:
> Collect type profile for DevTools
>
> Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
> in Chrome DevTools.
> Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
>
> When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
> a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
> dynamically typed, and for complex
> source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
> can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
>
> This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
> assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
>
> The output looks something like this:
>
> #my_var1
> #Object
> #number
> #string
> #number
> #undefined
> #string
> #Object
> #Object
>
>
> We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
> carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
> only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
>
>
> Missing work:
> * Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
> * Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
> * Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
>
>
>
> BUG=v8:5935
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
> Committed: 0332bebde9TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,franzih@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2749673003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43798}
Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43791}
In Isolate::CaptureSimpleStackTrace, we were ignoring interpreter entry
frames so far. This CLs changes this to gets the interpreted stack from
the wasm interpreter and add the frames to the FrameArray.
R=ahaas@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5822
Change-Id: I705909532ff28af412ff809da94522866eaa1c0d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/452378
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43772}
We emulate break by callling breakProgramCallback function in debugger context, we can just use HandleDebugBreak.
It allows us to move all stepping logic to debug.cc later and remove one usage of debugger context.
+ two minor issues fixed, see tests.
BUG=v8:5510
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2738503006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43750}
Add a mechanic to set these Builtin exception predictions per-Isolate
rather than per-Context in the Bootstrapper.
Also add Debugger tests which would fail without these prediction
modes set.
Does not yet test for AsyncFromSyncIteratorPrototypeReturn, as this
requires AsyncGenerators and `yield*` to be hit.
BUG=chromium:691875
R=yangguo@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, gsathya@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic2d2aba3870cce2f7321080f4278875edf253c76
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/451967
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43742}
Once we enabled --turbo by default we need to turn all the implications
off with --no-turbo as well. Chrome sets flags in V8 using SetFlagFromString,
which enforces the implications each time it is called. Therefore, if --turbo
is enabled by default, and an unrelated flag is set, the turbo implications are
enabled but not later disabled if we set --no-turbo. To fix this, add negative
implications as well.
BUG=chromium:692409
Change-Id: Iadb0ca542f49ba65c7419cda8c7a03636a8d5ba9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/451320
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43655}
If the top-level function cannot be found, we previously assumed an
invocation count of 1. This is wrong when we expect the invocation
counts to be reset for precise coverage.
TBR=jgruber@chromium.orgR=caseq@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723003007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43620}
This CL provide type with each break location, type could be: call, return or debugger statement.
BUG=chromium:432469
R=yangguo@chromium.org,dgozman@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2728563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43619}
This method could be called on pause and will do stepInto next scheduled callback if any will happen until next break.
First implementation support only callbacks chained by Promise.prototype.then.
BUG=chromium:432469
R=yangguo@chromium.org,dgozman@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723273002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43616}
If the imported wasm function is being debugged (i.e. redirects to the
interpreter), call it via the JS_TO_WASM stub, such that we can disable
the breakpoint later by patching the exported function.
This also contains a drive-by fix in wasm-translation.cc (for the case
that all known positions are bigger than the requested one).
R=titzer@chromium.org, kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5971, v8:5822
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2720813002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43583}
