This patch normalizes the casing of hexadecimal digits in escape
sequences of the form `\xNN` and integer literals of the form
`0xNNNN`.
Previously, the V8 code base used an inconsistent mixture of uppercase
and lowercase.
Google’s C++ style guide uses uppercase in its examples:
https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Non-ASCII_Characters
Moreover, uppercase letters more clearly stand out from the lowercase
`x` (or `u`) characters at the start, as well as lowercase letters
elsewhere in strings.
BUG=v8:7109
TBR=marja@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,mlippautz@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I790e21c25d96ad5d95c8229724eb45d2aa9e22d6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/804294
Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49810}
This is consistent with C++ memory model and avoids confusion with GC
write barrier.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2912773002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45584}
Reason for revert:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.ports/builders/V8%20Android%20Arm64%20-%20builder/builds/4851
Original issue's description:
> Update implementation of atomics with latest Chromium version but use compiler builtin atomics
>
> Ideally, we would use the standard library. However, when we are compiling against an older version of the standard library the atomic implementation may be slow.
>
> BUG=
TBR=mlippautz@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/2438983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40489}
Ideally, we would use the standard library. However, when we are compiling against an older version of the standard library the atomic implementation may be slow.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/2425963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40488}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg,v8_linux_gcc_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1393023003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31185}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Arm debug.
Original issue's description:
> Reland: Introduce a V8_NORETURN macro and use it to make GCC 4.9.2 happy again.
>
> Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
> Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
>
> Original code review from Sven Panne:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
>
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/93ae81101af68d81b7af84ea4046ea849e605116
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,karl@skomski.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1398643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31167}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1383053005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
