(Reland: NeedsManualRebaseline'd newly-fixed layout test in Chromium.)
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings
or templates when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were
only enforcing that it not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape
sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2948903002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46106}
This method returns position of importing stmt in module source.
R=neis@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:721589
Change-Id: I8639796a001fdfec7cf5aa1bf1a27493f7a757a9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/541322
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46105}
This was never legal; the spec only allows '\0' in strict-mode strings or templates
when not followed by a decimal digit. Previously we were only enforcing that it
not be followed by an _octal_ digit.
This was already fixed for numeric literals, but not for escape sequences in strings.
BUG=v8:6504
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2950633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46046}
This feature has been on by default without incident
since V8 5.8.
Bug: v8:5051
Change-Id: I1baf81922efd87e07448955147c50a5ba5a0aa42
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532214
Reviewed-by: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45881}
In some [1] cases where a lexical declaration is not allowed, ASI will
cause a `let` at the end of a line to be interpreted as an
identifier. A recent patch [2] to fix up the error messages from
misplaced `let` usage was a little overzealous in triggering
the error, throwing a SyntaxError in this edge case. This patch
restores the ASI behavior, which is permitted in JSC and
SpiderMonkey as well. Thanks to a test262 test from Andre Bargull
for raising this issue.
[1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement
[2] https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
Bug: v8:3305
Change-Id: I80ae8ad9a8a93389ff1003323f0d3f003e7a8c8e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/529225
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45817}
In sloppy mode, allow multiply labelled function declarations, such as
a: b: function c() {}
Such a form is allowed by the specification, as well as ChakraCore,
SpiderMonkey and JSC (though ChakraCore because it doesn't enforce
any lexical label restrictions.)
Thanks to Andre Bargull for adding the test262 test which caught the bug.
Change-Id: I2d3f172830c2e63252f00afa03177a7d17d79a27
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/527639
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45802}
This removes logic tracking whether a number literal in the source
contained a "dot" character or not. The tracking was only needed for
validation of asm.js modules on the AST, it is obsolete now.
R=marja@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib474e2281db80fe56d43e1af52221a7c66261e01
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/503228
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45255}
New test262 tests bring up a couple cases with async arrow functions
that V8 didn't seem to handle properly; this patch makes those cases
errors:
- async (...x,) => y -- Rest parameter must be last formal parameter
- async (...x = z) => y -- No default value for rest parameter
- async (...x, y) => z -- Rest parameter must be last formal parameter
Bug: v8:4483, v8:5051
Change-Id: I024d9ba0c854e8e5e75283df2ee53127b1be090d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/496057
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45116}
let/const declarations in "standard" C-style for-loops have
some complex desugaring to accommodate the case where loop
loop variables may be captured. This slows down the baseline
performance of for-loops with let variables.
This change attempts to avoid this desugaring if it's known that
the loop variable is not captured at any point. A side effect of
this change is that let/const loop variables, when not captured
within the loop body, are not necessarily shown in the debugger,
similar to other stack-allocated vars.
BUG=v8:4762, v8:5460
R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Change-Id: I8dbe545a12c086f675972bdba60c94998268311a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/472247
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44731}
No usage sites are getting the length for uncompiled functions, so we can
postpone setting the correct length until after compilation. This way we don't
need to produce and store it for skipped inner functions.
In the current implementation, getting the function length compiles it (and
users rely on it - so the feature is probably not going to go away).
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: Id8c9a05d2391505a6cde613841094170c9a1b808
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/468927
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44679}
Introduce 'contextual keyword' tokens, which are parsed as identifiers but
in some contexts are treated by the parser like proper keywords. These are
usually keywords introduced by recent ECMAScript versions, which for reasons
of backwards compatibility are still permissible as regular identifiers in
most contexts.
Current usage is to check for Token::IDENTIFIER and then do a string
compare. With this change the initial scan will scan them as usual, but
will then record the token as IDENTIFIER plus a secondary token with the
'contextual' value.
BUG=v8:6902
Change-Id: I6ae390382998cf756a23720bd481cb9c0eb78a72
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/459479
Commit-Queue: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44189}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I0a3546618d01b9232014da94cf8d0f72427a0d1d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458006
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44176}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Ief4eb3c9873026a93338d5556985f31c9abe17e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458005
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Clifford <danno@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44173}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I977eec8faecc8a112506f219994b4e4ec388b180
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458004
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44160}
A step towards removing isolate from ParseInfo.
Removing isolate from ParseInfo will make it easier to create and
execute parse tasks on background threads.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Iefd2fd01a700509f05d6f1a272cfa39cc545d39b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/458001
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44096}
It was removed so that Parser::DeserializeScopeChain does not have
to get it from ParseInfo.
Only a small step in direction of removing isolate from ParseInfo.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: Iaaf92dc6eb5ec9c4efc05ac73666fbc66e0ed8c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/457999
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44057}
The AssignmentExpressions can legally contain destructuring assignments.
BUG=v8:6098
R=marja@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Change-Id: I99b3a0f4c8d103edfb1dda943ec3e2ab2a5969f7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/455221
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44049}
Parse tasks are still WIP so there is really no benefit turning them on.
Turn off irrelevant tests.
Fix duplicate parameters inverted logic.
Fix use_counts tracking.
Fix language mode, super_property, evals.
Fix modules and stack overflow.
BUG=v8:6093
Change-Id: I8567b36eef7b9de6799789e7520810bde9c86e5b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/455916
Commit-Queue: Wiktor Garbacz <wiktorg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43903}
A previous patch lifting the restriction on invalid escape sequences in
tagged templates had a bug when two template tokens appeared immediately
adject to each other. This moves invalid escape information from the
tokenizer state proper into the TokenDesc, preventing the overwriting
which caused this issue.
Previous CL is at
https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
BUG=v8:6029,v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2724003006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43596}
This implements the proposal at
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
staged behind a flag --harmony-template-escapes. The proposal allows
invalid octal, unicode, and hexadecimal escape sequences to appear in
tagged template literals, instead of being a syntax error. These have
a 'cooked' value of 'undefined', but are still accessible through the
'raw' property.
BUG=v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43384}
When --harmony-async-iteration is enabled, it is now possible to
use the for-await-of loop, which uses the Async Iteration protocol
rather than the ordinary ES6 Iteration protocol.
the Async-from-Sync Iterator object is not implemented in this CL,
and so for-await-of loops will abort execution if the iterated object
does not have a Symbol.asyncIterator() method. Async-from-Sync
Iterators are implemented seperately in https://codereview.chromium.org/2645313003/
BUG=v8:5855, v8:4483
R=neis@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637403008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43224}
ParserBase::is_any_identifier currently does not recognise
Token::ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD as an identifier. This seems different
from what ParserBase::ParseIdentifierName does, and also prevents
"l\u0065t", unlike "let", from becoming a label.
This CL extends is_any_identifier to also accept ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD.
BUG=v8:5692
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2695973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43204}
Also make them use the helpers that I introduced recently.
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684343004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43100}
Move the logic into Scope::DeclareVariable to be more robust.
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685293003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43098}
E.g.,
{ function lazy_inner(b = somevar) { let somevar; } }
If we don't produce the same scopes, PreParser thinks that the unresolved
variable inside the default parameter resolves into the variable declared inside
the function. Thus, it's not correctly recorded as a free variable.
One part is already done by https://codereview.chromium.org/2638333002 . But at
the laziness boundary, we still produced different scopes.
Unlike previously thought, this is also needed for lazy inner function
correctness, not only for "preparser scope analysis" (ie., skipping inner
functions).
BUG=v8:5938
Change-Id: I047cd43ef16478bb0f18d1f114845e7d1ab8c5f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439345
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43044}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone. (patchset #7 id:140001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
> >
> > Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> > in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> > share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> > and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
> >
> > BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> > Committed: 14fb337200
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> > Committed: 9e7d5a6065
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
> Committed: 9fe08ec067TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679303003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43015}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
> >
> > Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> > if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> > occurs inside a loop. For example:
> >
> > let i = 10;
> > do { var x = i } while (i--):
> >
> > As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> > as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> > syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> > occurs in a block scope.)
> >
> > BUG=v8:5636
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> > Committed: a33fcd663b
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
> Committed: f3ae5ccf57TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43013}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
Original issue's description:
> [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
>
> Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> occurs inside a loop. For example:
>
> let i = 10;
> do { var x = i } while (i--):
>
> As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> occurs in a block scope.)
>
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> Committed: a33fcd663bTBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Original issue's description:
> Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> Committed: 14fb337200
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> Committed: 9e7d5a6065TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
Cleanup CHECK_EQ order and simplify CHECK_EQ(true/false).
Cleanup callorder for negative numbers
Cleanup callorder order for capital letter constants.
Cleanup callorder for test.x checks.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2677183002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42997}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
Committed: 14fb337200
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
Reason for revert:
doesn't compile on ToT
Original issue's description:
> Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> Committed: 14fb337200TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42994}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
occurs inside a loop. For example:
let i = 10;
do { var x = i } while (i--):
As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
occurs in a block scope.)
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
Turns out is_hidden is not the right condition for "scope should be present in
the preparse data". For now, replaced it with "is hidden leaf scope" (i.e.,
doesn't contain any non-hidden scopes). That's probably not the right condition
either; will be fixed once there's more data to decide what the right condition
is.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2669163002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42909}
Throw a syntax error on "new import(1)" expression. Adds a new error msg as well.
BUG=v8:5785
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42827}
If hidden scopes are ignored, the scopes and variable produced by the PreParser
already matched the scopes and variables produced by the Parser.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2663043003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42824}
Rewrites import expression into a runtime call. Uses peekahead to
determine if parsing an import declaration or import expression.
The runtime call doesn't actually do the import yet, will be added in
follow on patch.
Adds a new --harmony-dynamic-import flag.
Adds a ignore_error_msg parameter to the test runner to ignore the
discrepancy in the error messages while parsing import expression with
parser and pre parser. This discrepancy will actually never happen in
real code.
BUG=v8:5785
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42820}