We noticed that almost every call site were loading both files,
the split isn't necessary anymore.
In some message tests, removed the absolute line number to allow future
changes.
Bug: v8:8726
Change-Id: I8527f0a1ecfa685aa01a5e2f5f47ddf1cb13a545
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1446452
Commit-Queue: Sven Sauleau <ssauleau@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59220}
This patch introduces assertPromiseFulfills and assertPromiseFulfills as
a replacement for assertPromiseResult because it’s more JavaScript-y.
BUG=v8:6921
R=ahaas@chromium.org
Also-By: ahaas@chromium.org
Change-Id: I2f865dba3992ddf3b58987bf0b376d143edb5c31
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/718746
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48578}
This wraps up the move to explicit APIs, i.e.
instantiateStreaming/compileStreaming.
Bug:
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: Icc8280b2b3ad35acb90cc0beebe3acd7581179d7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/525141
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45719}
As per spec, (https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/pull/1068), we
don't have compile/instantiate overloads anymore, instead, we
have explicitly named members.
This change introduces the new APIs, implements instantiateStreaming
based on compileStreaming, and uses the existing embedder mechanism.
It does not yet remove the functionality from compile/instantiate -
we do that after we adopt the new APIs on the blink side.
Also, it temporarily handles exceptions on the v8 side, which is also
something we'll move to the blink side.
Bug:
Change-Id: I77673b1c0d395dfcf13b2f25464fd5dfd99c8d82
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/508852
Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45411}
This reverts commit f7c25da680.
Reason for revert: Fixed
Original change's description:
> Revert "Introducing an event loop mechanism for d8."
>
> This reverts commit de964dbe57.
>
> Reason for revert:
> https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux/builds/17958
>
> Original change's description:
> > Introducing an event loop mechanism for d8.
> >
> > This mechanism ensures APIs like wasm async complete their work,
> > without requiring use of natives (%APIs).
> >
> > The mechanism is similar to the one used in content_shell,
> > which should allow us to easily port tests in that environment.
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2842843005
> > Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44908}
> > Bug:
> > Change-Id: I9deee0d256a600c60b42902fc8ef8478e5546344
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494968
> > Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45165}
>
> TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,mtrofin@google.com,jochen@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Change-Id: Iafec2615d705d1990c57229cab3a988c00b5e12f
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/498630
> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45166}
TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,mtrofin@google.com,jochen@chromium.org,v8-reviews@googlegroups.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ic3c782e918326e291a6cb9bb349c609e9a340b09
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/498430
Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45172}
This reverts commit de964dbe57.
Reason for revert:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux/builds/17958
Original change's description:
> Introducing an event loop mechanism for d8.
>
> This mechanism ensures APIs like wasm async complete their work,
> without requiring use of natives (%APIs).
>
> The mechanism is similar to the one used in content_shell,
> which should allow us to easily port tests in that environment.
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2842843005
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44908}
> Bug:
> Change-Id: I9deee0d256a600c60b42902fc8ef8478e5546344
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494968
> Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45165}
TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,mtrofin@google.com,jochen@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Iafec2615d705d1990c57229cab3a988c00b5e12f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/498630
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45166}
This mechanism ensures APIs like wasm async complete their work,
without requiring use of natives (%APIs).
The mechanism is similar to the one used in content_shell,
which should allow us to easily port tests in that environment.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2842843005
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44908}
Bug:
Change-Id: I9deee0d256a600c60b42902fc8ef8478e5546344
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494968
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45165}
Today, the semantics of:
WebAssembly.instantiate
and
WebAssembly.compile().then(new WebAssemblyInstance)
are subtly different, to the point where attempting the proposed
change uncovered bugs.
In the future, it's possible that .instantiate actually have different
semantics - if we pre-specialized to the provided ffi, for example.
Right now that's not the case.
This CL:
- gets our implementation closer to what developers may write using
the compile -> new Instance alternative, in particular wrt promise
creation. By reusing code paths, we uncover more bugs, and keep
maintenance cost lower.
- it gives us the response-based WebAssembly.instantiate implicitly.
Otherwise, we'd need that same implementation on the blink side. The
negative is maintenance: imagine if the bugs I mentioned could only be
found when running in Blink.
BUG=chromium:697028
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2806073002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44592}
Committed: 7829af3275
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2806073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44669}
Reason for revert:
Roll blocker: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=710824
Original issue's description:
> [wasm] instantiate expressed in terms of compile
>
> Today, the semantics of:
>
> WebAssembly.instantiate
>
> and
>
> WebAssembly.compile().then(new WebAssemblyInstance)
>
> are subtly different, to the point where attempting the proposed
> change uncovered bugs.
>
> In the future, it's possible that .instantiate actually have different
> semantics - if we pre-specialized to the provided ffi, for example.
> Right now that's not the case.
>
> This CL:
> - gets our implementation closer to what developers may write using
> the compile -> new Instance alternative, in particular wrt promise
> creation. By reusing code paths, we uncover more bugs, and keep
> maintenance cost lower.
>
> - it gives us the response-based WebAssembly.instantiate implicitly.
> Otherwise, we'd need that same implementation on the blink side. The
> negative is maintenance: imagine if the bugs I mentioned could only be
> found when running in Blink.
>
> BUG=chromium:697028
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2806073002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44592}
> Committed: 7829af3275TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:697028
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2810203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44614}
Today, the semantics of:
WebAssembly.instantiate
and
WebAssembly.compile().then(new WebAssemblyInstance)
are subtly different, to the point where attempting the proposed
change uncovered bugs.
In the future, it's possible that .instantiate actually have different
semantics - if we pre-specialized to the provided ffi, for example.
Right now that's not the case.
This CL:
- gets our implementation closer to what developers may write using
the compile -> new Instance alternative, in particular wrt promise
creation. By reusing code paths, we uncover more bugs, and keep
maintenance cost lower.
- it gives us the response-based WebAssembly.instantiate implicitly.
Otherwise, we'd need that same implementation on the blink side. The
negative is maintenance: imagine if the bugs I mentioned could only be
found when running in Blink.
BUG=chromium:697028
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2806073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44592}
