TBR=tmrts@chromium.org
Also skip some tests too slow in full debug mode.
Bug: v8:9145
Change-Id: Ied8781be26d2c1efd7720e333775da9f6d632236
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1598759
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61281}
The "stress_background_compile" variant runs on all our bots. We
combine it with testing wasm code GC (which kind of fits into
background compile stressing) to get more coverage for that. Both
features are orthogonal, so we can test both at the same time without
loosing any coverage.
R=machenbach@chromium.orgCC=rmcilroy@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8217
Change-Id: Ib17decd4869978ff98e302694fa73d70ceec120e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1588472
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61151}
Failure addressed by not exposing the new test to the jitless environment.
(jgruber@ on TBR).
New enum RelocInfo::COMPRESSED_EMBEDDED_OBJECT created to support
compressed pointers in generated code. Enum name EMBEDDED_OBJECT
changed to FULL_EMBEDDED_OBJECT.
RelocInfo::[set_]target_object() abstract away the difference between
FULL_EMBEDDED_OBJECT and COMPRESSED_EMBEDDED_OBJECT.
Compressed embedded objects can only be created at this time on
x64 with pointer compression turned on. Arm64 constant pools don't
support compressed objects at this time.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
Bug: v8:7703
TBR: jgruber@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifff53b041bab09b4b8c3e16085e5df4aa2b99f4f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1588461
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61104}
This is a reland of 3cda21de77
Original change's description:
> V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames
>
> On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64
> backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI
> compliant stack frames. See
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit
> for more details.
>
> This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same
> prolog and epilog:
>
> push rbp,
> mov rbp, rsp
> ...
> pop rbp
> ret N
>
> and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows
> should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all
> allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a
> single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated
> inside that code-range.
>
> This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64:
>
> EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins
> snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and
> in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking
> for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported).
> The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit
> this unwind info for builtins.
>
> Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering
> dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new
> Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is
> destroyed.
>
> Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in
> wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp).
>
> It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering
> PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded
> builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the
> same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API:
> SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own
> unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code.
> V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR
> in the Chromium repository:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703).
>
> All these changes are experimental, behind:
>
> the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and
> the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag.
>
> Bug: v8:3598
> Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330}
Bug: v8:3598
Change-Id: If988baf7d3e4af165b919d6e54c1ad985f8e25e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1534618
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60581}
Previously when lazy source positions were enabled, source positions
were immediately collected whenever an exception was thrown for every
frame in the stack trace.
This change makes source position collection trigger only when the
source positions of a stack frame are actually accessed with the
exception of the top frame which is still eagerly collected for now.
Additionally when stack overflows occur during source position
collection, the bytecode is marked with exception in the
source_position_table field so it can be distinguished from the case
where source position collection has never been attempted (undefined)
or is not desired because the bytecode is for natives
(empty_byte_array).
Bug: v8:8510
Change-Id: If7ee68edbacc9e2adadf00fe5ec822a8dbe1c79a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1520721
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60504}
Allocate feedback vectors lazily when the function's interrupt budget has
reached a specified threshold. This cl introduces a new field in the
ClosureFeedbackCellArray to track the interrupt budget for allocating
feedback vectors. Using the interrupt budget on the bytecode array could
cause problems when there are closures across native contexts and we may
delay allocating feedback vectors in one of them causing unexpected
performance cliffs. In the long term we may want to remove interrupt budget
from bytecode array and use context specific budget for tiering up decisions
as well.
Bug: v8:8394
Change-Id: Ia8fbb71f5e8543a92f14c44aa762973da82d445c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1520719
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60450}
This reverts commit 3cda21de77.
Reason for revert: Breaks the roll on Windows (see https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8918477701097622400)
Original change's description:
> V8 x64 backend doesn't emit ABI compliant stack frames
>
> On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64
> backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI
> compliant stack frames. See
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit
> for more details.
>
> This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same
> prolog and epilog:
>
> push rbp,
> mov rbp, rsp
> ...
> pop rbp
> ret N
>
> and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows
> should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all
> allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a
> single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated
> inside that code-range.
>
> This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64:
>
> EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins
> snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and
> in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking
> for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported).
> The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit
> this unwind info for builtins.
>
> Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering
> dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new
> Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is
> destroyed.
>
> Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in
> wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp).
>
> It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering
> PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded
> builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the
> same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API:
> SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own
> unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code.
> V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR
> in the Chromium repository:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703).
>
> All these changes are experimental, behind:
>
> the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and
> the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag.
>
> Bug: v8:3598
> Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330}
TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,gdeepti@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,paolosev@microsoft.com
Change-Id: If8470da94c58df8c800cbe8887f9f86236e43353
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:3598
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1532321
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60372}
On 64 bit Windows, the OS stack walking does not work because the V8 x64
backend doesn't emit unwinding info and also because it doesn't emit ABI
compliant stack frames. See
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-wf50jFlii0c_Pr52lm2ZU-49m220nhYMrHDi3vXnh0/edit
for more details.
This problem can be fixed by observing that V8 frames usually all have the same
prolog and epilog:
push rbp,
mov rbp, rsp
...
pop rbp
ret N
and that it is possible to define XDATA (UNWIND_CODEs) that specify how Windows
should walk through V8 frames. Furthermore, since V8 Code objects are all
allocated in the same code-range for an Isolate, it is possible to register a
single PDATA/XDATA entry to cover stack walking for all the code generated
inside that code-range.
This PR contains changes required to enable stack walking on Win64:
EmbeddedFileWriter now adds assembler directives to the builtins
snapshot source file (embedded.cc) to emit additional entries in the .pdata and
in the .xdata section of the V8 executable. This takes care of stack walking
for embedded builtins. (The case of non-embedded builtins is not supported).
The x64 Assembler has been modified to collect the information required to emit
this unwind info for builtins.
Stack walking for jitted code is handled is Isolate.cpp, by registering
dynamically PDATA/XDATA for the whole code-range address space every time a new
Isolate is initialized, and by unregistering them when the Isolate is
destroyed.
Stack walking for WASM jitted code is handled is the same way in
wasm::NativeModule (wasm/wasm-code-manager.cpp).
It is important to note that Crashpad and Breakpad are already registering
PDATA/XDATA to manage and report unhandled exceptions (but not for embedded
builtins). Since it is not possible to register multiple PDATA entries for the
same address range, a new function is added to the V8 API:
SetUnhandledExceptionCallback() can be used by an embedder to register its own
unhandled exception handler for exceptions that arise in v8-generated code.
V8 embedders should be modified accordingly (code for this is in a separate PR
in the Chromium repository:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1474703).
All these changes are experimental, behind:
the 'v8_win64_unwinding_info' build flag, and
the '--win64-unwinding-info' runtime flag.
Bug: v8:3598
Change-Id: Iea455ab6d0e2bf1c556aa1cf870841d44ab6e4b1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1469329
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60330}
We should use 'constant pool' to allow concurrent patching of
the jump table like arm. For now just skip the test to make CI
mips bot green.
Bug: v8:8974
Change-Id: Iaf2b0245128fdcf2c8ed964f796781134570c889
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1524755
Commit-Queue: Yu Yin <xwafish@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60323}
On LoadCodeObjectEntry check for IsOffHeapTrampoline instead of
BuiltinIndexOffset so LoadCodeObjectEntry can correctly jump to the
on-heap trampoline when we use --interpreted-frames-native-stack.
R=jgruber@chromium.org, yangguo@google.com
Bug: v8:8911
Change-Id: I172d4735671726d32328de246990b513106e3a7f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1516692
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60288}
This CL only provides the implementation of memory.{init,copy,fill} and
data.drop.
Bug: v8:8965
Change-Id: I439f2520bfee8f147e4b0d1d31f954aaad2e14ad
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1510575
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60253}
... similar to how we do this in native irregexp code, i.e. handle
interrupts on each backtrack. Unhandlified references into the code
ByteArray and the subject String object are updated after a potential
GC.
Since interrupts may change the subject string's representation, the
interpreter is now called in a loop to handle retries.
Bug: v8:8724
Change-Id: Ic34de8d69ccc56d4656b8ed080c2c168c212ebfc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1511477
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60187}
This piggy-backs off similar support for lite mode, which silently skips
tests that require optimization in lite (and now jitless) modes.
Bug: v8:7777,v8:8778, v8:8885
Change-Id: I666d92685ca71682224028743f02d0cce3723135
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1503758
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60057}
Port 9c7b6e1e8a
Original Commit Message:
This is the implementation of crrev.com/c/766371 for arm.
Original description:
Add the ability to return (multiple) return values on the stack:
- Extend stack frames with a new buffer region for return slots.
This region is located at the end of a caller's frame such that
its slots can be indexed as caller frame slots in a callee
(located beyond its parameters) and assigned return values.
- Adjust stack frame constructon and deconstruction accordingly.
- Extend linkage computation to support register plus stack returns.
- Reserve return slots in caller frame when respective calls occur.
- Introduce and generate architecture instructions ('peek') for
reading back results from return slots in the caller.
- Aggressive tests.
- Some minor clean-up.
R=ahaas@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com, miladfar@ca.ibm.com
BUG=
LOG=N
Change-Id: I83df1af8c49f6d6c5b529db599fce61a1da2490d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1496549
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Junliang Yan <jyan@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60032}
This is a reland of 71d29f7892
Original change's description:
> [nojit] Don't flush the icache in jitless mode
>
> We don't allocate executable memory in jitless mode hence there's no
> need to flush the icache.
>
> Bug: v8:7777
> Change-Id: I70a1884e6c9f11405465f5741f2eccd4f7a273fb
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1488765
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59887}
Bug: v8:7777
Change-Id: Id48455cf4e6d28ad2a0b753580ca51cbe0e983d3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1491601
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59916}
This reverts commit 9215ac2c2a.
Reason for revert: Turns out it fails on windows too: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/v8/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/8920360960120786848/+/steps/Check_-_extra__flakes_/0/logs/SampleWhenFrameIsNotS../0
Original change's description:
> [cpu-profiler] Disable failing tests on arm simulator only
>
> These tests still fail on arm simulators and don't appear easily fixable
> but are low priority. Let's still run them on other build configs.
>
> Bug: v8:8917
> Change-Id: If0a2f44b746eff5e82eb750103304e788dfbbfb5
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1491593
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59903}
TBR=sigurds@chromium.org,petermarshall@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic77791ddfd37e67307af6ec7b064e31e2db92039
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:8917
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1491604
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59911}
Also enable test runner to differentiate between clang and gcc.
Bug: v8:8919
Change-Id: Icdcae0aba3644a1b1b9ddc6c037eabde27d717f7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1491634
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergiy Belozorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59906}
These tests still fail on arm simulators and don't appear easily fixable
but are low priority. Let's still run them on other build configs.
Bug: v8:8917
Change-Id: If0a2f44b746eff5e82eb750103304e788dfbbfb5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1491593
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59903}
I can't reproduce any of these flakes anymore on windows or linux.
Some are confirmed fixed with the same root cause as crbug.com/v8/8883.
Others are not reproducible anymore and were probably fixed by other
de-flaking and bugfixes in the last 6 months.
Bug: v8:5193, v8:7054
Change-Id: I23ce47a98f11f3637ccf4baf01ffab5c461a0ebd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1489074
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59873}
Field representation tracking is only used by TurboFan.
Bug: v8:7777
Change-Id: I0d930f8dc0b68ff030111f12092b183c4c257ac6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1481218
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59820}
The default TracingController (used by d8 and Node) has some concurrency
issues. The new test flushes these out, when a second thread logs trace
events while the main thread calls StopTracing().
- Use an acquire load in UpdateCategoryGroupEnabledFlags() because this
was racing with GetCategoryGroupEnabled() where a new category is
added in the slow path. g_category_groups is append-only, but
reads/writes to g_category_index need to be correctly ordered so that
new categories are added and only then is the change to the index
visible. The relaxed load ignored this and caused unsynchronized
read/write.
- Use a relaxed load in ~ScopedTracer() to access category_group_enabled
as this previously used a non-atomic operation which caused a race
with UpdateCategoryGroupEnabledFlag() which does a relaxed store.
- Replace TracingController::mode_ with an atomic bool as read/writes to
mode_ were not synchronized and caused TSAN errors. It only has two
states and it doesn't seem like we will extend this so just convert it
to bool.
- Take the lock around calling trace_object->Initialize in
AddTraceEvent(), and around trace_buffer_->Flush() in StopTracing().
These two raced previously as the underlying TraceBufferRingBuffer
passes out pointers to TraceObjects in a synchronized way, but the
caller (AddTraceEvent) then writes into the object without
synchronization. This leads to races when Flush() is called, at which
time TraceBufferRingBuffer assumes that all the pointers it handed out
are to valid, initialized TraceObjects - which is not true because
AddTraceEvent may still be calling Initialize on them. This could be
the cause of issues in Node.js where the last line of tracing/logging
sometimes gets cut off. This is kind of a band-aid solution - access
to the TraceObjects handed out by the ring buffer really needs proper
synchronization which at this point would require redesign. It's quite
likely we will replace this with Perfetto in the near future so not
much point investing in this code right now.
- Enable TracingCpuProfiler test which was flaky due to these bugs.
Bug: v8:8821
Change-Id: I141296800c6906ac0e7f3f21dd16d861b07dae62
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477283
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <ofrobots@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59752}
This extends the "test-jump-table-assembler" stress test to supported
architectures. Note that on both PPC and S390 the tests flushes out the
race during jump table patching pretty reliably. Fixing this issue is
outside the scope of this change, this just ensures test coverage exists
but keeps the test in question disabled.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=cctest/test-jump-table-assembler
BUG=v8:8018
Change-Id: Ia299ed2a42f9858019627270a25026b53f3628d3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1478200
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59738}
Also disables tests in Lite mode that currently fail with lazy source
positions.
Bug: v8:8510
Change-Id: Id27b7cb31682559173b137ef51eaf06d517ee9ec
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477129
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59700}
This is a reland of c79a63e634
Original change's description:
> [nojit] Don't expose wasm in jitless mode
>
> Wasm currently still creates executable memory even in
> interpreter-only mode, and is thus unsupported in jitless mode. This
> hides wasm completely, which will help e.g. fuzzers that attempt to
> run wasm code (and currently crash on the CHECK in AddOwnedCode).
>
> Bug: v8:7777,chromium:931068
> Change-Id: Iee692cb947d482ba16fb0f4da32490d42d5daef8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470124
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59561}
Tbr: mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7777, chromium:931068
Change-Id: I535c3f598c90cd5c4072a73544cc33c5bf5460c1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470132
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59571}
This reverts commit c79a63e634.
Reason for revert: Needs addtl test skips: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470124
Original change's description:
> [nojit] Don't expose wasm in jitless mode
>
> Wasm currently still creates executable memory even in
> interpreter-only mode, and is thus unsupported in jitless mode. This
> hides wasm completely, which will help e.g. fuzzers that attempt to
> run wasm code (and currently crash on the CHECK in AddOwnedCode).
>
> Bug: v8:7777,chromium:931068
> Change-Id: Iee692cb947d482ba16fb0f4da32490d42d5daef8
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470124
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59561}
TBR=mstarzinger@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ic242db3efe73ef362e0f0c3efde90682db6de4a8
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7777, chromium:931068
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470131
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59570}
Wasm currently still creates executable memory even in
interpreter-only mode, and is thus unsupported in jitless mode. This
hides wasm completely, which will help e.g. fuzzers that attempt to
run wasm code (and currently crash on the CHECK in AddOwnedCode).
Bug: v8:7777,chromium:931068
Change-Id: Iee692cb947d482ba16fb0f4da32490d42d5daef8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1470124
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59561}
The line number is associated with each sample along with pointer
to the ProfileNode and timeDelta. Once collected line numbers are
streamed as an array of integers in "ProfileChunk" trace events.
If all the line numbers are zero, the array may be omitted. Otherwise
the array length matches length of samples and timeDeltas arrays.
BUG=chromium:925089
Change-Id: I1ef5cd1b208b03bb127f4d17b1efa74c01959542
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1459739
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Alexei Filippov <alph@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59514}
This is a reland of 0befa6d4c3
Original change's description:
> [nojit] Check that --jitless is disabled when creating wasm code
>
> Drive-by: Amend wasm test skips for lite mode.
>
> Bug: v8:7777
> Change-Id: I23e13b65e548c19d6b24a26e0b962a9978f54ed7
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1449616
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59314}
Tbr: mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7777
Change-Id: I0a076b36bb2e69b612df89b0f35067f299f27a7e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1451819
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59325}
