Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
For now, has a test that compares the stdout of --type-profile in test/message. We
will remove this test when --type-profile is fully integrated in
the debugger protocol. Adding
the test in test/inspector does not work, because the inspector
test itself consists of JavaScript code that would convolute the
output and be non-deterministic under stress.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43866}
The order in which things were done wasn't quite correct and lead
to wrong behaviour for certain circular module graphs.
BUG=v8:1569,chromium:694566
Change-Id: I291186e261268c853a30ad891ff362904e0b28ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447399
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43497}
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced
"SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context"
for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen.
As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the
case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a
single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is
indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current
error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as
an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other
identifier after "let".
This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports
accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring,
and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration.
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1].
This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a
customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is
not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the
sequence of "let [".
[1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
Also updated some tests due to the change. The general pattern is when a
trailing comma is expected to cause a SyntaxError, an additional comma was
added.
BUG=v8:5051
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2638513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42826}
The current logic in Isolate::GetLocationFromStackTrace just ignores
wasm frames, making the computed location point to the first javascript
frame, like this:
test.js:17: RuntimeError: divide by zero
module.exports.main();
^
RuntimeError: divide by zero
at main (<WASM>[1]+5)
at test.js:17:16
This CL not only fixes the location to point to the top-most wasm
frame, but also exposes to the embedder that the script of that location
is a wasm script, allowing for custom printing of wasm locations.
The Shell::ReportException method now checks for this flag, and prints
wasm locations like this:
<WASM>[0]+5: RuntimeError: divide by zero
RuntimeError: divide by zero
at main (<WASM>[0]+5)
at test/message/wasm-trap.js:15:16
R=titzer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:613110
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2563673002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41640}
When an octal escape sequence is in a string in strict mode:
- Octal literals are not allowed in strict mode.
+ Octal escape sequences are not allowed in strict mode.
When an octal escape sequence is in a template string:
- Octal literals are not allowed in template strings.
+ Octal escape sequences are not allowed in template strings.
BUG=v8:4973
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2551633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41560}
This makes sure call-site rendering for certain {TypeError} messages is
based on the correct underlying {JSFunction}, even when inlined frames
are present. Only the {FrameSummary} knows the exact function.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
TEST=message/regress/regress-crbug-661579
BUG=chromium:661579
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2521103005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41264}
This fixes the message reported via the {TypeError} thrown when trying
to call a non-constructable function as a constructor. Also adds some
more related message tests for similar exceptions.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
TEST=message/call-non-constructable
BUG=chromium:661579
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2523803003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41220}
It originates from the era where we used to run a separate preparse step
before parsing and store the function data. Now the usage of preparser
is something completely different, so this flag doesn't make sense any
more.
In addition, this way we get more test coverage for preparser (for small
scripts).
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2513563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41110}
We used to point elsewhere, for instance the right-hand-side of an assignment.
Small limitation: Since variable proxies only have a start position, not an end
position, the best we can do is point at the first character. (We cannot rely
on the scanner's last token position because Declare may be called long after
the variable has been scanned.)
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5572
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2447143005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40613}
For instance, when an import cannot be resolved, actually
point at the corresponding import statement.
BUG=v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2451153002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40594}
In case of duplicate exports, always report the error for the very last
one.
(Fixed a bug.)
BUG=v8:5358,v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2340953002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39434}
This removes two bits of duplication:
- Parsing of each AssignmentExpression, which previously was called
first outside the loop and then inside the loop.
- Parsing of arrow rest parameters, which previously was handled
separately for the one-arg and N-arg cases.
The only change in behavior is in a few error messages.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39030}
Tail calls don't make sense from async functions and generators, as
each activation of these functions needs to make a new, distnict,
non-reused generator object. These tail calls are not required per
spec. This patch disables both syntactic and implicit tail calls
in async functions and generators.
R=neis
BUG=v8:5301,chromium:639270
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2278413003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38986}
Stack trace generation requires access to the receiver; and while the
receiver is already on the stack, we cannot determine its position
during stack trace generation (it's stored in argv[0], and argc is only
stored in a callee-saved register).
This patch grants access to the receiver by pushing argc onto builtin
exit frames as an extra argument. Compared to simply pushing the
receiver, this requires an additional dereference during stack trace
generation, but one fewer during builtin calls.
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106883003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37500}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel;tryserver.v8:v8_linux_nosnap_dbg
Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37416}
Reason for revert:
Looks like this breaks on nosnap: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug/builds/7626
Original issue's description:
> [builtins] New frame type for exits to C++ builtins
>
> Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
> frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
> show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
>
> Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
> not skipped during stack trace construction.
>
> BUG=v8:4815
> R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37394}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Unlike previous implementation where the 'continue' keyword was a feature of a return statement the keyword is now recognized as a part of expression. Error reporting was significantly improved.
--harmony-explicit-tailcalls option is now orthogonal to --harmony-tailcalls so we can test both modes at the same time.
This CL also adds %GetExceptionDetails(exception) that fetches hidden |start_pos| and |end_pos| values from the exception object.
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1928203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36024}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
This prepares for pulling chromium's build as dependency for
gn. After this, the files in build and gypfiles need to stay
in sync until chromium is updated.
BUG=chromium:474921
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1848553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35898}
The parser uses a try-catch in order to record when the client of an iterator
throws. The exception then used to get rethrown via 'throw', which
unfortunately resulted in the original exception message object getting
overwritten.
This CL solves this as follows:
- add a clear_pending_message flag to TryCatchStatement (set to true in normal
cases),
- set clear_pending_message to false for the TryCatchStatement used in iterator
finalization
- change full-codegen, turbofan, and the interpreter to emit the ClearPendingMessage call
only when the flag is set,
- replace 'throw' with '%ReThrow' in the iterator finalization code, thus
reusing the (not-cleared) pending message
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4875
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1842953003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35226}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
This rebaselines all our internal tests for error messages thrown by the
implementation of 'instanceof' to the new ES6 semantics. It also applies
a minor rephrasing to the messages in question.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4447
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1822663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34940}
It was never being set to false in production (though it was in test-parsing.cc,
due to that test having its own flag-setting logic).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1815033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34878}
test262 "negative" test expectations list which exception is thrown. The ES2017
draft specification is very specific about which exception class is thrown
from which path, and V8 works hard to be correct with respect to that spec.
Previously, the test262 test runner would accept any nonzero status code,
such as from a crash, or a FAIL printed out, for a negative test. This
patch makes negative tests check for the right answer using a quick-and-dirty
parsing of the exception printing from d8 to find the exception class.
It invokes d8 in a way to get a status code of 0 from thrown exceptions
so that 'negative' tests aren't actually implemented by negating the output.
Amazingly, this didn't catch any test262 failures, but I verified the extra
checking interactively by changing a negative test to expect a different type
and saw it fail.
BUG=v8:4803
R=machenbach
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1766503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34763}
This moves the last remaining JS file based tests out of the "preparser"
suite. The tests in question all are expected to parse normally and not
throw any exception. This also deprecates the ability of the test suite
to run anything else outside Python templated tests.
R=adamk@chromium.org
TEST=preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1782173005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34753}
This converts another test case that is expected to throw a TypeError
but no SyntaxError to have better test coverage (exact message is being
checked now).
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1786623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34715}
This converts existing "preparser" tests that expect a certain exception
message to be produced into "message" tests. Thereby we get much better
coverage because the former test suite degraded by now to just check
whether each test case threw or not, the exception message was not being
checked at all.
This also deprecates the ability of "preparser" to specify that single
test cases based on JS files are expected to throw, "messages" is far
superior, use that test suite instead.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784013003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34713}
This also runs the message test suite against Ignition. By now most of
the source positions (and exception messages) are accurate, the failing
ones have been blacklisted.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1783773003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34708}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
This avoids spending lots of time in Scope::RemoveUnresolved for very long
variable declaration lists.
BUG=v8:4699
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1655313003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34047}
Reason for revert:
Crash fixed by https://codereview.chromium.org/1564923007
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
> >
> > This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> > changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> > function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> > themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> > riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> > pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
> >
> > R=adamk@chromium.org
> > BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> > LOG=Y
> > CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
>
> TBR=adamk@chromium.org
> # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
> LOG=Y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/adac5956c6216056a211cfaa460a00ac1500d8f8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33189}
Reason for revert:
Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
Original issue's description:
> Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
>
> This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
>
> R=adamk@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> LOG=Y
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1565263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
LOG=Y
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
These constructors always go through C++ at least twice anyway, so
there's not really a point in trying to implement them in JavaScript.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:535408
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1548623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33012}
This will make sure that message tests cover both the parser and preparser
paths, just as we do for parsing-related cctests.
BUG=v8:4372
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1469383004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32307}
The first bug was that there are two different "initialization positions"
passed into PatternRewriter::DeclareAndInitializeVariables, and we weren't
setting them all properly for this case.
After further code review, it became clear that we weren't even recording
the correct position (the end of the initializer expression).
The combination of those two bugs caused the hole check elimination code
in full-codegen to skip emitting a hole check.
This patch takes care of both of those things. A follow-up will try
to reduce the number of "initializer positions" we track in the
variable declaration code.
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4568
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1468143004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32237}
For web compat reasons, we support an initializer in the declaration
part of a for-in loop. But we should disallow this for destructured
declarations (just as we do for lexical declarations). In fact, without
disallowing it, we crash.
Also fix up the PreParser to have the same restrictions here as the parser
(the lexical check was missing there), verified by running the message tests
with --min-preparse-length=0.
In fixing the logic I've also cleaned up the code a bit, removing the
only-called-once DeclarationParsingResult::SingleName method.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1471973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32236}
This is in preparation for the addition of --harmony-destructuring-assignment.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1450193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32098}
Reason for revert:
MSAN errors on arm64: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20MSAN/builds/5123/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Implement destructuring binding in try/catch
>
> The approach is to desugar
>
> try { ... }
> catch ({x, y}) { ... }
>
> into
>
> try { ... }
> catch (.catch) {
> let x = .catch.x;
> let y = .catch.y;
> ...
> }
>
> using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
> of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
> made inside the catch block.
>
> No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
> us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
> in the spec.
>
> There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
> support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
> good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
> block this moving forward.
>
> BUG=v8:811
> LOG=y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a316db995e6e4253664920652ed4e5a38b2caeba
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:811
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1408063013
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31798}
The approach is to desugar
try { ... }
catch ({x, y}) { ... }
into
try { ... }
catch (.catch) {
let x = .catch.x;
let y = .catch.y;
...
}
using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
made inside the catch block.
No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
in the spec.
There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
block this moving forward.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1417483014
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
When the checker was added prohibiting lexical binding called let,
certain error propagation was not implemented properly. This patch
fixes that issue, which fixes error checking for cases such as
let [let]
BUG=v8:4403
R=adamk
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1409613003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31289}
An identifier may be parsed in an object literal like {let}, but
this was previously left out of lexical name checking. This patch
adds that check to prohibit code like
let {let} = {let: 1}
BUG=v8:4403
LOG=N
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1401253003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31278}
This patch prohibits lexical bindings from being called 'let', even in
sloppy mode, following the ES2015 specification. The change affects
multiple cases of lexical bindings, including simple let/const declarations
and both kinds of for loops. var and legacy const bindings still permit
the name to be let, including in destructuring cases. Tests are added to
verify, though some cases are commented out since they led to (pre-existing)
crashes.
BUG=v8:4403
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371263003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31115}
Reason for revert:
Prime suspect in breakage of V8 Linux -- no snap
Original issue's description:
> [swarming] Isolate v8 testing.
>
> Add gyp support and isolates for default test suites.
> Add two default isolates, one (default) for using the
> test suite collection we call "default" on the bots. One
> (developer_default) for also supporting the way developers
> call the driver (i.e. without argument, which includes
> the unittests).
>
> BUG=chromium:535160
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/9bd83f58f29ab0c7c5b71b00bcb1df3a9e641f05
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31081}
TBR=tandrii@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,maruel@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:535160
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1370993008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31084}
Add gyp support and isolates for default test suites.
Add two default isolates, one (default) for using the
test suite collection we call "default" on the bots. One
(developer_default) for also supporting the way developers
call the driver (i.e. without argument, which includes
the unittests).
BUG=chromium:535160
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1380593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31081}
Arrow functions have been enabled by default since the 4.5 branch.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1373633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31031}
Now run-tests.py understands "suite/foo/bar" with forward slashes for
command-line test selection on all test suites on all platforms.
Previously, file-based suites like mjsunit also accepted "mjsunit/foo\bar";
that behavior is sacrificed here in favor of unification. For the cctest
suite, OTOH, it wasn't possible on Windows to select specific tests at all.
Original review: https://codereview.chromium.org/1348653003/
This reverts commit 5f44a91059.
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1356613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30798}
Reason for revert:
mozilla tests are failing on Windows
Original issue's description:
> [test] Fix cctest path separators on Windows
>
> Now run-tests.py understands "suite/foo/bar" with forward slashes for
> command-line test selection on all test suites on all platforms.
>
> Previously, file-based suites like mjsunit also accepted "mjsunit/foo\bar";
> that behavior is sacrificed here in favor of unification. For the cctest
> suite, OTOH, it wasn't possible on Windows to select specific tests at all.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/b36cfdb39ae648b49a1396c4f669df9b1f57996c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30794}
TBR=machenbach@google.com,machenbach@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1349163002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30795}
Now run-tests.py understands "suite/foo/bar" with forward slashes for
command-line test selection on all test suites on all platforms.
Previously, file-based suites like mjsunit also accepted "mjsunit/foo\bar";
that behavior is sacrificed here in favor of unification. For the cctest
suite, OTOH, it wasn't possible on Windows to select specific tests at all.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1348653003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30794}
This switches Isolate::ComputeLocation to use baseline code when
computing message locations. This unifies locations between optimized
and non-optimized code by always going through the FrameSummary for
location computation.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
TEST=message/regress/regress-4266
BUG=v8:4266
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1331603002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30635}
Second item in section 13.7.5.1 states that the error should be a
SyntaxError, when previously CheckAndRewriteReferenceExpression
would always emit a ReferenceError.
BUG=v8:4373
R=adamk, rossberg
LOG=N
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292393002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30184}
In doing so, fix calls CheckAndRewriteReferenceExpression to take proper
start and end positions (instead of just pointing at the first token in
the LHS expression).
BUG=v8:4370
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1290013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30166}
Duplicate parameters are banned both overall in strict mode and also
in arrow functions. Our error message for both cases blamed strict
mode, which is confusing. This patch fixes the message to point to
arrow functions as a possible source as well.
R=wingo, adamk
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1236863008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29662}
This patch includes the following changes.
1, Enable the turbofan backend support for X87 platform. It depends on previous CL: 3fdfebd26.
2, Enable the test cases which are disabled because turbofan for X87 was not enabled.
BUG=v8:4135
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1179763004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29049}
The strong-object-set-proto test cases will throw one expected exception
and the exception message should include the source position in the JS
file. But crankshaft compiler does not generate the source position for
it when creating the flow graph by default. The source position information
is always zero. So it failed when comparing with the reference file.
If we use crankshaft compiler on IA32 platform to run this test case, it
has the same failure.
we will open these test case for x87 once turbofan for X87 is enabled.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1179763003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29003}
