Commit Graph

136 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
caitpotter88
0d43421a22 [esnext] implement frontend changes for async/await proposal
BUG=v8:4483
LOG=Y
R=littledan@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1841543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36261}
2016-05-16 23:19:02 +00:00
machenbach
a05ecb05b6 Revert of add UseCounters for NonOctalDecimalIntegerLiteral in strict mode (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1948403002/ )
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Breaks
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.ports/builders/V8%20Arm%20-%20debug%20builder/builds/602

Original issue's description:
> In parallel to the strict octal check that would reject `012` in strict mode, this patch collects UseCounters for `089` in strict mode. The spec says this should be an error, but this patch does not report it as such.
>
> BUG=v8:4973
> LOG=y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/d0b6686c14339bd5d0aeaf610705c7ed85393e1f
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36221}

TBR=littledan@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,jwolfe@igalia.com
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4973

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1970333004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36224}
2016-05-13 06:53:52 +00:00
jwolfe
d0b6686c14 In parallel to the strict octal check that would reject 012 in strict mode, this patch collects UseCounters for 089 in strict mode. The spec says this should be an error, but this patch does not report it as such.
BUG=v8:4973
LOG=y

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1948403002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36221}
2016-05-12 20:54:14 +00:00
ishell
aa006f644b [es8] Prepare explicit tail calls (STC) for staging with implicit tail calls (PTC).
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1962853002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36129}
2016-05-10 10:19:28 +00:00
adamk
40b3626e45 Disallow yield in computed property names of class expressions in params
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4974
LOG=n

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1949223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36047}
2016-05-04 23:25:25 +00:00
ishell
1350eb3dc9 [es8] More spec compliant syntactic tail calls implementation.
Unlike previous implementation where the 'continue' keyword was a feature of a return statement the keyword is now recognized as a part of expression. Error reporting was significantly improved.

--harmony-explicit-tailcalls option is now orthogonal to --harmony-tailcalls so we can test both modes at the same time.

This CL also adds %GetExceptionDetails(exception) that fetches hidden |start_pos| and |end_pos| values from the exception object.

BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1928203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36024}
2016-05-04 13:44:42 +00:00
adamk
9e9abcfff4 Properly disallow 'yield' in class expressions and arrow parameters
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.

They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.

This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.

For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.

Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).

BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
2016-05-03 01:57:48 +00:00
bjaideep
d6229137bd PPC/s390: modify if/else block to fix debug build
changed the if/else block to fix the debug build
failure on PPC/s390.

R=adamk@chromium.org, mbrandy@us.ibm.com

BUG=
LOG=N

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35954}
2016-05-02 22:57:51 +00:00
mike
efe5b72d02 [parser] Enforce module-specific identifier restriction
Restrict the use of the `await` token as an identifier when parsing
source text as module code.

From
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-future-reserved-words:

> 11.6.2.2 Future Reserved Words
>
> The following tokens are reserved for used as keywords in future
> language extensions.
>
> Syntax
>
>     FutureReservedWord ::
>         enum
>         await
>
> await is only treated as a FutureReservedWord when Module is the goal
> symbol of the syntactic grammar.

BUG=v8:4767
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1723313002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35914}
2016-04-29 18:14:48 +00:00
littledan
63b935428c Disallow generator declarations in certain locations
The legacy function declaration locations from Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 do not
apply for generator declarations. This patch cracks down on those usages,
which is tested for by new incoming test262 tests.

BUG=v8:4824
LOG=Y
R=adamk

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1900033003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35835}
2016-04-27 19:18:38 +00:00
ishell
f95e130b7e [es8] Report proper syntax error for tail call expressions in for-in and for-of bodies.
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1914423002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35822}
2016-04-27 13:03:12 +00:00
ishell
ea2fbb7620 [es8] Initial set of changes to support syntactic tail calls.
The syntax is "return continue expr;".

BUG=v8:4915
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1917993004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35799}
2016-04-26 17:31:23 +00:00
adamk
739947880c Widen --harmony-for-in flag to throw errors in PreParser
The first version of --harmony-for-in avoided throwing PreParser
errors in order to retain use counting. This patch threads
use_counts_ through to the PreParser to allow use counting in
the PreParser while also throwing errors for this case.

Also slightly refactored the Parser code to do a little less
code duplication.

BUG=v8:4942
LOG=y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1913203002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35780}
2016-04-26 00:29:50 +00:00
nikolaos
fa43f4c99b Synchronize scopes between parser/preparser
This patch introduces new scopes in the preparser, just like they
are introduced by the parser, in the following places:

-   blocks
-   try statement
-   switch statement
-   scoped statements, in several places
-   for statement
-   eager function bodies

R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1906793002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35708}
2016-04-21 13:43:09 +00:00
vogelheim
ed9b7d92e7 Prevent un-parsed LiteralFunction reaching the compiler.
BUG=chromium:604044
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1895123002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35650}
2016-04-20 09:35:05 +00:00
adamk
a0a8ecd078 Remove runtime flags for sloppy mode block scoping features
These were all on by default in M49 without complaint.

R=littledan@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1858943002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35342}
2016-04-08 00:30:20 +00:00
littledan
7f108b655b Implement ES2015 labelled function declaration restrictions
ES#sec-islabelledfunction specifies that labelled function declarations
may not occur as the body of a control flow construct such as an if
statement. This patch implements those restrictions, which also
eliminates a previous case resulting in a DCHECK failure which is now
a SyntaxError.

BUG=chromium:595309
R=adamk
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1808373003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35049}
2016-03-24 01:59:47 +00:00
adamk
ed18aa65ea Remove support for legacy const, part 1
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.

In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.

Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.

Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
2016-03-22 17:52:13 +00:00
adamk
dea9559457 Remove destructuring and default arguments runtime flags
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.

Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
2016-03-10 23:22:30 +00:00
rossberg
4614c7caaf [strong] Remove all remainders of strong mode
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1773653002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34669}
2016-03-10 12:45:42 +00:00
littledan
0e7f095c6d Restrict FunctionDeclarations in Statement position
ES2015 generally bans FunctionDeclarations in positions which expect a Statement,
as opposed to a StatementListItem, such as a FunctionDeclaration which constitutes
the body of a for loop. However, Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 make exceptions for labeled
function declarations and function declarations as the body of an if statement in
sloppy mode, in the latter case specifying that the semantics are as if the
function declaration occurred in a block. Chrome has historically permitted
further extensions, for the body of any flow control construct.

This patch addresses both the syntactic and semantic mismatches between V8 and
the spec. For the semantic mismatch, function declarations as the body of if
statements change from unconditionally hoisting in certain cases to acquiring
the sloppy mode function in block semantics (based on Annex B 3.3). For the
extra syntax permitted, this patch adds a flag,
--harmony-restrictive-declarations, which excludes disallowed function declaration
cases. A new UseCounter, LegacyFunctionDeclaration, is added to count how often
function declarations occur as the body of other constructs in sloppy mode. With
this patch, the code generally follows the form of the specification with respect
to parsing FunctionDeclarations, rather than allowing them in arbitrary Statement
positions, and makes it more clear where our extensions occur.

BUG=v8:4647
R=adamk
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1757543003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34470}
2016-03-03 21:34:26 +00:00
nikolaos
ed66588041 This patch implements an alternative approach to the rewriting
of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
design document.  Details to be provided here.

1.  RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
    It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
    (that may or may not happen).  Also, Is... and As... macros now see
    through RewritableExpressions.

2.  The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
    rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.

3.  Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
    traits.  They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
    non-pattern rewritable expressions.  It is important that expression
    classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.

4.  The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.

BUG=chromium:579913
LOG=N

Committed: https://crrev.com/7f5c864a6faf2b957b7273891e143b9bde35487c
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1702063002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34162}
2016-02-19 15:59:33 +00:00
machenbach
5bb6b47bd5 Revert of Non-pattern rewriting revisited (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1702063002/ )
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] This makes jsfunfuzz unhappy:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Fuzzer/builds/7681

Original issue's description:
> This patch implements an alternative approach to the rewriting
> of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
> design document.  Details to be provided here.
>
> 1.  RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
>     It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
>     (that may or may not happen).  Also, Is... and As... macros now see
>     through RewritableExpressions.
>
> 2.  The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
>     rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.
>
> 3.  Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
>     traits.  They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
>     non-pattern rewritable expressions.  It is important that expression
>     classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.
>
> 4.  The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.
>
> BUG=chromium:579913
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/7f5c864a6faf2b957b7273891e143b9bde35487c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,nikolaos@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:579913

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1712203002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34158}
2016-02-19 15:06:31 +00:00
nikolaos
7f5c864a6f This patch implements an alternative approach to the rewriting
of non-pattern expressions, according to the (internally circulated)
design document.  Details to be provided here.

1.  RewritableAssignmentExpression has been renamed to RewritableExpression.
    It is a wrapper for AST nodes that wait for some potential rewriting
    (that may or may not happen).  Also, Is... and As... macros now see
    through RewritableExpressions.

2.  The function state keeps a list of rewritable expressions that must be
    rewritten only if they are used as non-pattern expressions.

3.  Expression classifiers are now templates, parameterized by parser
    traits.  They keep some additional state: a pointer to the list of
    non-pattern rewritable expressions.  It is important that expression
    classifiers be used strictly in a stack fashion, from now on.

4.  The RewriteNonPattern function has been simplified.

BUG=chromium:579913
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1702063002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34154}
2016-02-19 14:04:23 +00:00
adamk
cc2ea25747 Don't reflect ES2015 Function name inference in Function.prototype.toString
Various syntactic forms now cause functions to have names where they
didn't before. Per the upcoming changes to the toString spec, only
a name that was literally part of a function's expression or declaration
is meant to be reflected in toString. This also happens to be the same
set of names that V8 currently outputs (without the --harmony-function-name
flag).

This required distinguishing anonymous FunctionExpressions from other sorts
of function definitions (like methods and getters/setters) in the AST, parser,
and at runtime.

The patch also takes the opportunity to remove one more argument (and enum)
from FunctionLiteral, as well as adding a special factory method for the
case of a FunctionLiteral representing toplevel or eval'd code.

BUG=v8:4760
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1712833002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34132}
2016-02-19 02:51:10 +00:00
adamk
3d56b0d7c0 Remove unused 'needs_init' member of ParsingResult
Also various related cleanup in ParseVariableDeclarations(). The only
changes in logic are explained below:

  - We were redundantly checking for parenthesized binding patterns;
    these are already ruled out by BindingPatternUnexpectedToken()
    calls in the places where we hit an LPAREN.
  - There's no need to default-initialize a LET-mode variable in a
    for-each loop, just as there isn't for CONST or CONST_LEGACY
    (ParseForStatement will take care of properly initializing all
    of the above).

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1661193002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33749}
2016-02-04 18:44:33 +00:00
adamk
ea8f782799 Remove redundant/unnecessary variables and checks in ParseForStatement
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1663773003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33748}
2016-02-04 18:39:22 +00:00
mike
f7263b6a3f [parser] Disallow Expression in for..of statements
Although the `for..in` statement allows Expressions to define the
iterator, only an AssignmentExpression may occupy this position in the
`for..of` statement.

BUG=v8:4692
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1602823003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33420}
2016-01-20 22:05:48 +00:00
adamk
316dc17331 Clean up FunctionLiteral AST node cruft
Removed unused name_ field, made bitfield 16-bits long, and moved it to
the start of the struct, resulting in a reduction of 8 bytes on both
32 and 64-bit platforms.

Most other changes (which prompted this work) are cosmetic:r
  - Combined redundant enums
  - Named enum values kConsistently
  - Consistently use booleans in bitfield, using enum values
    only for passing information into NewFunctionLiteral
  - Removed unneeded arguments from NewFunctionLiteral, reducing
    clutter at callsites
  - Added const correctness consistently

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1566053002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33194}
2016-01-08 20:38:33 +00:00
caitpotter88
1f1af42d3a [parser] parenthesized Literals are not valid AssignmentPatterns
Encode "parenthesized" status of parenthesized Expressions to prevent
them from being treated as Patterns.

BUG=v8:4657, v8:811
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1570793002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33190}
2016-01-08 17:47:17 +00:00
adamk
2367abf025 [es6] Handle function names in object and class literals
This required refactoring ParsePropertyDefinition to pass the parsed
string name as an out param, since ObjectLiteralProperty stores Smis
for Smi-representable property keys.

Computed properties are not yet handled in this patch.

BUG=v8:3699
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1563923002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33141}
2016-01-06 23:39:15 +00:00
caitpotter88
18f41e4653 [es6] support AssignmentPattern as LHS in for-in/of loops
BUG=v8:811, v8:4599
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1517973002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32814}
2015-12-11 19:39:40 +00:00
adamk
8b968b70e9 Revert of [es6] support AssignmentPattern as LHS in for-in/of loops (patchset #9 id:280001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1508933004/ )
Reason for revert:
Hits unreachable code (found by fuzzer). Example crasher:

"for(();;);"

Original issue's description:
> [es6] support AssignmentPattern as LHS in for-in/of loops
>
> BUG=v8:811, v8:4599
> LOG=N
> R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/e47bdb775564b2cd8365047425898ab4274190a6
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32773}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:811, v8:4599

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1511773009

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32774}
2015-12-11 02:00:01 +00:00
caitpotter88
e47bdb7755 [es6] support AssignmentPattern as LHS in for-in/of loops
BUG=v8:811, v8:4599
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1508933004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32773}
2015-12-11 01:06:48 +00:00
rossberg
b6a2ff8ede Split ParserBase into separate file
Reviving/redoing littledan's previous CL.

R=nikolaos@chromium.org
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1504833002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32658}
2015-12-07 14:26:49 +00:00
rossberg
199bbdb40f Create ast/ and parsing/ subdirectories and move appropriate files
Moves all files related to AST and scopes into ast/,
and all files related to scanner & parser to parsing/.

Also eliminates a couple of spurious dependencies.

R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1481613002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32351}
2015-11-26 16:23:07 +00:00