This adds a new ToString runtime function and a fast-path ToStringStub
(which is just a simple dispatcher for existing functionality), and also
implements %_ToName using the ToStringStub.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4307
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1319973007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30442}
This adds a %ToName runtime entry that uses the previously introduced
Object::ToName, which is based on the new Object::ToPrimitive method.
Also removes the need to expose ToName in various way via the builtins
and/or context.
Drive-by-fix: Let %HasProperty do the ToName conversion implicitly as
required.
BUG=v8:4307
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1319133002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30435}
This is the first step towards a spec compliant ToPrimitive
implementation (and therefore spec compliant ToNumber, ToString,
ToName, and friends). It adds support for the @@toPrimitive
symbol that was introduced with ES2015, and also adds the new
Symbol.prototype[@@toPrimitive] and Date.prototype[@@toPrimitive]
initial properties.
There are now runtime functions for %ToPrimitive, %ToNumber and
%ToString, which do the right thing and should be used as fallbacks
instead of the hairy runtime.js implementations. I will do the
same for the other conversion operations mentioned by the spec in
follow up CLs. Once everything is in place we can look into
optimizing things further, so that we don't always call into the
runtime.
Also fixed Date.prototype.toJSON to be spec compliant.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4307
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306303003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30434}
Adds Uint32x4, Uint16x8, and Uint8x16 types.
Adds all functions in the current spec, except for loads and stores.
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1294513004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30322}
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here,
let x = 1;
function f(g = () => x) {
var y
eval("var x = 2")
return g() + x // f() = 3
}
we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body:
- Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object.
- When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo).
- While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum.
- Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object.
- Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts.
- In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings.
- In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope.
- ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain.
- Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface.
- While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger.
Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled.
@mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts.
@yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff.
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811,v8:2160
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
We currently have several ways to share symbols that are used in
both native scripts and the runtime. This change unifies this.
We do not use the symbols registry since we don't need the
registry any longer after bootstrapping, but the registry stays
alive afterwards.
R=mlippautz@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293493004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30280}
Reason for revert:
This performance hack is no longer necessary.
Original issue's description:
> Group lexical context variables for faster look up.
>
> Currently, looking up a lexical context variable requires looking up
> the variable name and then checking its mode. This can be a bottleneck
> in Runtime_DeclareGlobals, even when no lexical context variables are
> declared.
>
> R=rossberg@chromium.org
> BUG=crbug:517778
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a45ed17bb6aca02e940f13bbf456d660cccc86ae
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30075}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=crbug:517778
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1290053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30145}
No need to provide TO_INT32/TO_UINT32 functions for every native
context, as they can be implemented in terms of TO_NUMBER more easily
and efficiently.
Also remove the obsolete TO_BOOLEAN_FUN_INDEX from the native contexts.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1275013004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30080}
Currently, looking up a lexical context variable requires looking up
the variable name and then checking its mode. This can be a bottleneck
in Runtime_DeclareGlobals, even when no lexical context variables are
declared.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=crbug:517778
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1281883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30075}
There is only one use case for it: String.prototype.search converts a
string argument into a RegExp. The cache is used to avoid repeating that
conversion. However, this does not make the added complexity worthwhile.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1267493006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29985}
This is the initial (big) step towards a more uniform implementation of
the ToObject abstract operation (ES6 7.1.13), where we have a fallback
implementation in JSReceiver::ToObject() and a fast (hydrogen) CodeStub
to deal with the fast case (we should be able to do more cleanup on this
in a followup CL). For natives we expose the abstract operation via a
%_ToObject intrinsic, also exposed via a macro TO_OBJECT, that unifies
the previous confusion with TO_OBJECT_INLINE, ToObject, TO_OBJECT,
$toObject and %$toObject. Now the whole implementation of the abstract
operation is context independent, meaning we don't need any magic in the
builtins object nor the native context.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1266013006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29953}
This CL exposes the constructor function, defines type related
information, and implements value type semantics.
It also refactors test/mjsunit/samevalue.js to test SameValue and SameValueZero.
TEST=test/mjsunit/harmony/simd.js, test/cctest/test-simd.cc
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Committed: https://crrev.com/e5ed3bee99807c502fa7d7a367ec401e16d3f773
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29689}
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29712}
This CL exposes the constructor function, defines type related
information, and implements value type semantics.
It also refactors test/mjsunit/samevalue.js to test SameValue and SameValueZero.
TEST=test/mjsunit/harmony/simd.js, test/cctest/test-simd.cc
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29689}
Until now, TF-generated code stubs piggy-backed off of the builtin
context. Since generation of code stubs is lazy, stubs generated at
different times in different native contexts would contain embedded
pointers different builtin contexts, leading to cross-context references
and memory leaks.
After this CL, all TF-generated code stubs are generated inside a
internal thinned-out, native context that lives solely for the
purpose of hosting generated code stubs.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1213203007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29593}
Map: get, set, has, delete, clear
Set: add, has, delete, clear
All except clear are implemented as calls into collection.js.
Note that some of these shadow methods of v8::Object. It's unclear
how confusing that's going to be: on the one hand, it seems likely
that most operations you would want to do on a Map or Set are these.
On the other, generic code could get confused if it somehow gets
ahold of a variable that happens to be C++-typed as a v8::Map or v8::Set.
BUG=v8:3340
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1204623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29237}
The Map and Set maps get overwritten when collection.js executes, so in
a nosnap build we have to wait until it runs before we grab the maps.
To facilitate that, store the functions in the native context as well.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1161363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28743}
These are similar to the Map/Set constructors when called with an array,
except that they are guaranteed to be side-effect free if called with
a packed array.
This will be useful in implementing structured clone which, as
specified in HTML, speaks in terms of the internal [[MapData]]
and [[SetData]] slots without going through the exposed iteration
ES semantics.
BUG=v8:3340
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1155893003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28642}
Only supports constructing new objects and returning size.
Followup patch will need to add ability to retrieve and
set contents in order to support structured clone.
Also removes a bunch of outdated "experimental" markers from v8.h.
BUG=v8:3340
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1157453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28637}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
