This CL adds timestamps to coverage updates. This is useful for clients,
because between requesting a coverage update and collecting coverage data
significant time may pass. This change allows precise attribution at what
time a coverage update was taken.
Change-Id: I65a9cccb0171e892b7dbe35d105d3ca246ba08d0
Bug: chromium:1022031
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1992435
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65696}
Now that function counts are based on dedicated call counters instead
of FeedbackVector::invocation_count, we can enable optimizations for
block coverage modes.
This significantly speeds up V8 with enabled coverage:
Before this CL, the web-tooling-benchmark regressed by 70% (block
count coverage vs. no coverage). With this CL, the regression is
reduced to 40%.
Bug: v8:6000,v8:9148
Change-Id: I6bb538bd66f32f016c66c1d1996bce3b25958232
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1615241
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61582}
Prior to this CL, call counts at function scope were taken from the
FeedbackVector::invocation_count field. This had two major drawbacks:
1. for generator functions, these count the number of resumptions
instead of the number of calls; and 2. the invocation count is not
maintained in optimized code.
The solution implemented here is to add a dedicated call counter at
function scope which is incremented exactly once each time the
function is called.
A minor complication is that our coverage output format expects
function-scope counts in the dedicated CoverageFunction object, and
not as a CoverageBlock. Thus function-scope block counts are initially
marked with magic positions, and later recognized and rewritten during
processing.
This CL thus fixes reported generator function call counts and enables
optimizations in block coverage modes (more to come in a follow-up).
Drive-by: Don't report functions with empty source ranges.
Bug: v8:6000,v8:9148,v8:9212
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng
Change-Id: Idbe5edb35a595cf12b6649314738ac00efd173b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1613996
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61574}
Preserve coverage for unused functions by force marking them used when
code coverage is enabled.
Bug: chromium:927464
Change-Id: Ia973467d06f7268f4e98cc76d0bb98cc591e979c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454717
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59373}
Declare Variables with a name and position, rather than by passing
through a VariableProxy. This allows us to not create dummy proxies
for things like function declarations, and allows us to consider those
declarations unused.
As a side-effect, we also have to check if a variable is unused in the
bytecode generator (as it will no longer be allocated), and we end up
skip generating code/SFIs for dead variables/functions.
Change-Id: I4c2c872473f23e124f9456b4b92f87159658f8e0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1414916
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59088}
This changes a few bits about how continuation counters are handled.
It introduces a new mechanism that allows removal of a continuation
range after it has been created. If coverage is enabled, we run a first
post-processing pass on the AST immediately after parsing, which
removes problematic continuation ranges in two situations:
1. nested continuation counters - only the outermost stays alive.
2. trailing continuation counters within a block-like structure are
removed if the containing structure itself has a continuation.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8381, v8:8539
Change-Id: I6bcaea5060d8c481d7bae099f6db9f993cc30ee3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1339119
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58443}
This reverts commit 003159e777.
Reason for revert: breaks roll into Chromium: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_headless_rel/3140
Original change's description:
> [inspector] RemoteObject.description should be empty for primitive type
>
> We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
> can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
> (remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
> simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
>
> R=dgozman@chromium.org
> TBR=jgruber@chromium.org
>
> Bug: chromium:595206
> Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
> Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
> Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
TBR=dgozman@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org,kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ifc184e1ac158d9ea7034922a7250444448fac49f
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1081207
Reviewed-by: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53461}
We currently report description field for numbers. On client side user
can calculate description as remoteObject.unserializableValue ||
(remoteObject.value + ''). Let's report description only for objects to
simplify value -> remoteObject logic a bit.
R=dgozman@chromium.orgTBR=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:595206
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: I91356a44aa3024e20c8f966869abf4a41b88e4bc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737485
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Feldman <pfeldman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53453}
When collecting source ranges for conditionals (`a ? b : c`), include
the '?' and ':' tokens in the then- and else ranges, respectively.
Bug: v8:7098
Change-Id: I22315e2040c96c977e0b49e1fafe4228a6558471
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/778321
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49484}
This is so that precise coverage starts with a clean slate.
The old behavior can be emulated by calling getBestEffortCoverage
before starting precise coverage.
R=jgruber@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:757998
Change-Id: Ib3ee2316966f676456198159bdcf8ba8b9d3896f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635084
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47629}
Consider:
function f() {
return;
}
This CL ensures that the closing brace is considered as covered by
introducing a special case for open-ended range rewrites when the
parent range is the function range itself.
Bug: v8:6000, v8:6661
Change-Id: I0be307759967e9f4df245a4f367326a37dda86fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/597651
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47079}
Function-granularity coverage skips functions that are both uncovered
and have an uncovered parent. This optimization needs to be tweaked once
block coverage and incremental collection is in play, as it is possible
to have a function with invocation_count == 0 (i.e. uncovered at
function granularity) that still has relevant block-granularity
coverage.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I4cc81b8a6935aa58e29d383ed4fa749cbfe69352
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/589508
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46991}
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I8c068383300ba869a87f836504c84ea08fcff87e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/568307
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46675}
This adds a new binary block coverage mode (in addition to the existing count
block coverage), as well as a few transformation passes to reduce the number of
uselessly reported ranges.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I4fb234ca015990d00aa2f1dccb87f76ba4748994
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/552642
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46463}
This CL adds a few transformations that clean up the set of reported
source ranges. Duplicates, empty, and uncovered ranges are removed, and
nested/consecutive ranges are merged if possible.
BUG=v8:6000
Change-Id: I421ee35ce8292cfe84c1eea4f653762cea5d909d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558411
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46450}
This piggy-backs on top of existing precise and best-effort coverage to expose
block coverage through the inspector protocol.
Coverage collection now implicitly reports block-granularity coverage when
available. A new 'isBlockCoverage' property on Inspector's FunctionCoverage
type specifies the granularity of reported coverage.
For now, only count-based block coverage is supported, but binary block
coverage should follow soon.
Support is still gated behind the --block-coverage flag.
Bug: v8:6000
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I9c4d64e1d2a098e66178b3a68dcee800de0081af
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532975
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46157}
