This parameter was just for convenience but did not end up in the
generated bytes.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9183
Change-Id: Id4faf5b9ad20a357c069c3189db6ed14945dea8c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1621929
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61681}
The bulk memory proposal changed behavior of segment initialization
during instantiation. Previously, all segments would be bounds-checked,
after which the segments would be initialized.
The bulk memory proposal removes the up-front check, and always
initializes active segments in order, starting with element segments and
then continuing with data segments. Each active segment is initialized
as-if they were being initialized with the `memory.init` and
`table.init` instructions, so an out-of-bounds initialization may still
modify the memory or table partially.
Bug: v8:8892
Change-Id: I472fca2401e07d60b288f0cc745629a451b31088
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1565033
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60885}
This is a reland of 63608968b6
The previous CL failed on Windows, but it was a general bug. The
dropped_elem_segments was not being set on the instance properly in
cctests, so`table.init` instructions would fail by reading uninitialized
data.
I took this opportunity to also add an implementation of
`elem.drop` in the interpreter, and ported the JS tests for those too.
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Implement table.init for interpreter
>
> This also fixes CheckCallViaJS when a trap occurs. In that case, the
> trap callback is called instead of an exception being thrown, so if it
> isn't handled, a bogus result will be returned instead.
>
> Bug: v8:8965
> Change-Id: I560e89f353756df23c062fb8c9484d9971c19253
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1539078
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60473}
Bug: v8:8965
Change-Id: Ia547d9530b7ca67fde5bd94539f49153b796e82d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1547142
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60664}
This CL only provides the implementation of memory.{init,copy,fill} and
data.drop.
Bug: v8:8965
Change-Id: I439f2520bfee8f147e4b0d1d31f954aaad2e14ad
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1510575
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60253}
This CL just adds a parameter to addElementSegment and adjusts all
existing tests.
Note that addElementSegment contains some convenience code to construct
one initial table if it does not exist yet. I did not extend that code
to multiple tables. If you want to use multiple tables, you have to
create them first before calling addElementSegment.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
Bug: v8:7581
Change-Id: Ie131fd5dc19856703ab5cfb2fa8f7d576f70a18b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1520709
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60211}
The bulk memory operations should not bounds check ahead of time, but
instead should write as many bytes as possible until the first
out-of-bounds access.
Bug: v8:8890
Change-Id: Ia8179fe268fc65816c34a8f3461ed0a0d35600aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1497520
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60040}
We noticed that almost every call site were loading both files,
the split isn't necessary anymore.
In some message tests, removed the absolute line number to allow future
changes.
Bug: v8:8726
Change-Id: I8527f0a1ecfa685aa01a5e2f5f47ddf1cb13a545
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1446452
Commit-Queue: Sven Sauleau <ssauleau@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59220}
The table.init bytecode copies a range of elements from an element
segment into a table, trapping if the segment is not passive, is
dropped, or would cause out-of-bounds accesses.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.orgCC=binji@chromium.org
BUG=v8:7747
Change-Id: Ib27af9cca45a464fd1f876ddd092e99941481896
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1430063
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59037}
The table.copy bytecode copies a range of table entries in a similar
way to memcopy. This CL implements the behavior in a runtime call
that calls into the wasm engine.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
BUG=v8:7747
Change-Id: I420451202b1b78ea92cbd10387a644ed57e111c8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1414919
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58858}
The table.drop bytecode "drops" the backing storage for an element
initializer. In the V8 implementation, this is a nop, other than
updating a per-instance boolean array so that two drops of the same
segment or a drop of an active segment will trap.
This is implemented with inline code in TurboFan in order to be symmetric
to memory.drop, but could as easily be a runtime call to be supported in
Liftoff.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
CC=binji@chromium.org
BUG=v8:7747
Change-Id: Ic017398eaa764dd3a9ff19523453ff7142c9abf6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1408996
Reviewed-by: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58817}
This CL adds two new runtime calls for table operations:
- Runtime_WasmTableInit
- Runtime_WasmTableCopy
These runtime calls (will) implement the semantics for the corresponding
bytecodes from the bulk memory proposal. The actual implementation
of these runtime calls will be done in further CLs.
The third table operation, table.drop, will be implemented with inline
code, similar to memory.drop. This is also be done in a further CL.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
CC=binji@chromium.org
BUG=v8:7747
Change-Id: I498aa054329baf9f72ae55d245b12c3ccd4157b7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1408994
Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58786}
`memory.init` copies bytes from a passive data segment to linear memory.
`memory.drop` is an instruction that informs the wasm VM that the instance no
longer needs access to the passive data segment.
Information about the passive data segments, including their contents, length,
and whether they are dropped, is stored in the `WasmInstanceObject` as primitive
arrays.
Bug: v8:7747
Change-Id: I1515c8868c9be227743456a539126c15280b5365
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1370691
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58196}
This implementation currently only supports the optimized tier.
Bug: v8:7747
Change-Id: Ia1af29b11a5d3e8a48b122f6cf3240c9f5948bfb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1364710
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58137}
The {setTableLength} method is redundant and has a single user. Remove
it, use {setTableBounds} instead.
Drive-by: Add default to the table max, to document that this can
actually be {undefined}, in which case the table has no maximum.
R=binji@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8238
Change-Id: I0d7a2f4d49d083f7adadbb4b6cd4933bcb1dc174
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1350126
Reviewed-by: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57860}
See the WebAssembly bulk memory proposal here:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations
This initial CL adds a wasm experimental flag:
`--experimental-wasm-bulk-memory`, and also parsing of passive segments.
A passive segment is one that is not copied into the table/memory on
instantiation, but instead later via the `{table,memory}.init`
instructions.
The binary format of passive data segments is unlikely to change, but
the format for passive element segments may change (see
https://github.com/WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations/pull/39).
Bug: v8:7747
Change-Id: I2a7fb9bc7648a722a8c4aab4185c68d3d0843858
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1330015
Commit-Queue: Ben Smith <binji@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57451}
