So far the parser had its own harmony flag to disable the harmony scoping
feature when parsing native functions. With the introduction of the extended
language mode this becomes unnecessary because native functions will never enter
the extended mode. The parser can thus track FLAG_harmony_scoping and the
language mode of the current scope to see if harmony features are allowed. The
scanner and preparser have to keep their flag, because they can't use
FLAG_harmony_scoping as it is not available for the preparser-process
executable.
This depends on:
http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035/
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8562002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10063 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This CL introduces a third mode next to the non-strict
(henceforth called 'classic mode') and 'strict mode'
which is called 'extended mode' as in the current
ES.next specification drafts. The extended mode is based on
the 'strict mode' and adds new functionality to it. This
means that most of the semantics of these two modes
coincide.
The 'extended mode' is entered instead of the 'strict mode'
during parsing when using the 'strict mode' directive
"use strict" and when the the harmony-scoping flag is
active. This should be changed once it is fully specified how the 'extended mode' is entered.
This change introduces a new 3 valued enum LanguageMode
(see globals.h) corresponding to the modes which is mostly
used by the frontend code. This includes the following
components:
* (Pre)Parser
* Compiler
* SharedFunctionInfo, Scope and ScopeInfo
* runtime functions: StoreContextSlot,
ResolvePossiblyDirectEval, InitializeVarGlobal,
DeclareGlobals
The old enum StrictModeFlag is still used in the backend
when the distinction between the 'strict mode' and the 'extended mode' does not matter. This includes:
* SetProperty runtime function, Delete builtin
* StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC
* StubCache
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10062 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
So far free variables references in eval code are not statically
resolved. For example in
function foo() { var x = 1; eval("y = x"); }
the variable x will get mode DYNAMIC and y will get mode DYNAMIC_GLOBAL,
i.e. free variable references trigger dynamic lookups with a fast case
handling for global variables.
The CL introduces static resolution of free variables references in eval
code. If possible variable references are resolved to bindings belonging to
outer scopes of the eval call site.
This is achieved by deserializing the outer scope chain using
Scope::DeserializeScopeChain prior to parsing the eval code similar to lazy
parsing of functions. The existing code for variable resolution is used,
however resolution starts at the first outer unresolved scope instead of
always starting at the root of the scope tree.
This is a prerequisite for statically checking validity of assignments in
the extended code as specified by the current ES.next draft which will be
introduced by a subsequent CL. More specifically section 11.13 of revision 4
of the ES.next draft reads:
* It is a Syntax Error if the AssignmentExpression is contained in extended
code and the LeftHandSideExpression is an Identifier that does not
statically resolve to a declarative environment record binding or if the
resolved binding is an immutable binding.
TEST=existing tests in mjsunit
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8508052
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9999 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This also includes the two fixes from r9674 and r9675. Here's the diff
to the previous CL.
--- a/src/runtime.cc
+++ b/src/runtime.cc
@@ -11133,17 +11133,26 @@ class ScopeIterator {
context_(Context::cast(frame->context())),
nested_scope_chain_(4) {
+ // Catch the case when the debugger stops in an internal function.
+ Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared_info(function_->shared());
+ if (shared_info->script() == isolate->heap()->undefined_value()) {
+ if (shared_info->scope_info()->HasContext()) Next();
+ return;
+ }
+
// Check whether we are in global code or function code. If there is a stack
// slot for .result then this function has been created for evaluating
// global code and it is not a real function.
// Checking for the existence of .result seems fragile, but the scope info
// saved with the code object does not otherwise have that information.
- int index = function_->shared()->scope_info()->
+ int index = shared_info->scope_info()->
StackSlotIndex(isolate_->heap()->result_symbol());
// Reparse the code and analyze the scopes.
ZoneScope zone_scope(isolate, DELETE_ON_EXIT);
- Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared_info(function_->shared());
Handle<Script> script(Script::cast(shared_info->script()));
Scope* scope;
if (index >= 0) {
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8344046
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9734 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Previously the preparser always accepted natives syntax and let the
real parser throw the syntax error. In ES5, it should be an early error,
so the preparser must catch the error.
The perparser library does not expose parsing for natives syntax, it's
only used internally.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8306024
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9660 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
A multi-line comment containing a newline is considered a line-terminator for
other purposes, but a "-->" following such a comment is considered as being
on the same line as the text preceeding the multi-line comment.
This behavior matches JSC matching Firefox.
TEST=cctest/test-parsing/ScanHTMLEndComments
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7218009
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8351 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
We now only recognize "native function" when it occurs in extension scripts
(parsing with a non-NULL extension), and only if there is no line-terminator
between "native" and "function" (so that it would otherwise be a Syntax Error).
Preparsing never recognizes native functions, which is acceptable since we
never preparse extension scripts (because we don't allow lazy functions
anyway).
BUG=v8:1097
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7206020
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8326 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The ScannerConstants class was originally static fields on the scanner class.
During creation of the stand-alone preparser and later isolates, it has been
moved into a separate class with a per-isolate instance.
It is used to hold caching unicode Predicate values.
This change renames the class to UnicodeCache, and passes a reference
to the instance down to methods that doesn't have an easy access to
an isolate (to avoid, e.g., having to do an Isolate::Current() for every
number parsed).
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6824071
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@7584 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
It should now be possible to build the preparser using 'scons preparser' in both release and debug modes.
Remove v8.h include from scanner-base.h and other files.
Remove NativeAllocationChecker and all of its kind.
Moved Isolate::PreallocatedStorage* to isolate.cc
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/6749029
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@7413 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Make checks.h not depend on flags.h or global.h (or anything else except
include/v8stdint.h). Only checks.cc has the dependencies (so another
implementation of checks.cc can be provided by the preparser).
Now files depending on checks.h (using ASSERT macros) can include it
directly without depending on all of v8.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/4576001
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@5775 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
