... by disallowing checkpoint elimination across function boundaries.
See the comment in checkpoint-elimination.cc and the tests for details.
Bug: v8:9945
Change-Id: Ibf4ab6f0e4e709e26d3c4428a082ef45dcbeb8b0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1906208
Auto-Submit: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65027}
This is a reland of 289b25765a.
The fix for failures landed here:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1599388
Original change's description:
> [Test] Update tests to work with lazy feedback allocation.
>
> This adds either %EnsureFeedbackVectorForFunction or
> %PrepareFunctionForOptimization to allocate feedback vectors when testing
> optimization, allocation sites, IC transitions etc.,
>
> Bug: v8:8394
> Change-Id: I6ad1b6d460e4abda693b326cddb87754e080a0a1
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1593303
> Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> Auto-Submit: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61212}
Bug: v8:8394
Change-Id: Idb5bba221d138e6fd73155f959b9e16fc948c709
TBR: rmcilroy@chromium.org
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1599607
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61332}
This adds either %EnsureFeedbackVectorForFunction or
%PrepareFunctionForOptimization to allocate feedback vectors when testing
optimization, allocation sites, IC transitions etc.,
Bug: v8:8394
Change-Id: I6ad1b6d460e4abda693b326cddb87754e080a0a1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1593303
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61212}
This lets me run tests with --no-turbo-inlining without having to
worry about false positives.
Change-Id: Icf906e631ef5821136f397af141ba8b18334da7e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477730
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59707}
Following up on the earlier work regarding redundant Smi checks in
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1246181, it was
noticed that the handling of the 0 and -0 and how some operations
identify these is not really consistent, but was still rather ad-hoc.
This change tries to unify the handling a bit by making sure that all
number comparisons generally pass truncations that identify zeros, since
for the number comparisons in JavaScript there's no difference between
0 and -0. In the same spirit NumberAbs and NumberToBoolean should also
pass these truncations, since they also don't care about the differences
between 0 and -0.
Adjust NumberCeil, NumberFloor, NumberTrunc, NumberMin and NumberMax
to pass along any incoming kIdentifiesZeros truncation, since these
operations also don't really care whether the inputs can be -0 if the
use nodes don't care.
Also utilize the kIdentifiesZeros truncation for NumberModulus with
Signed32 inputs, because it's kind of common to do something like
`x % 2 === 0`, where it doesn't really matter whether `x % 2` would
eventually produce a negative zero (since that would still be considered
true for the sake of the comparison).
This also adds a whole lot of tests to ensure that not only are these
optimizations correct, but also that we do indeed perform them.
Drive-by-fix: The `NumberAbs(x)` would incorrectly lower to just `x` for
PositiveIntegerOrMinusZeroOrNaN inputs, which was obviously wrong in
case of -0. This was fixed as well, and an appropriate test was added.
The reason for the unification is that with the introduction of Word64
for CheckBounds (which is necessary to support large TypedArrays and
DataViews) we can no longer safely pass Word32 truncations for the
interesting cases, since the index might be outside the Signed32 or
Unsigned32 ranges, but we still identify 0 and -0 for the sake of the
bounds check, and so it's important that this is handled consistently
to not regress performance on TypedArrays and DataViews accesses.
Bug: v8:8015, v8:8178
Change-Id: Ia1d32f1b726754cea1e5793105d9423d84a6393a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1246172
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56325}
