With bytecode flushing and lazy feedback allocation, we need to call
%PrepareForOptimization before we call %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall,
ideally after declaring the function.
Bug: v8:8801, v8:8394, v8:9183
Change-Id: I3fb257282a30f6526a376a3afdedb44786320d34
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1648255
Commit-Queue: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62119}
This is a reland of 1a3a2bc335,
fixed an infinite loop in Map::TryUpdateSlow and added
a relevant test.
Original change's description:
> Fix accessor update of non-extensible maps.
>
> When installing getter/setter of non-extensible map with existing
> setter/getter of the same name, we introduce a new transition
> (so we have two transitions with the same name!). This triggers
> an assertion in map updater.
>
> This fix carefully checks that on the back-pointer path from
> non-extensible map to the extensible map there are only
> integrity level transitions. Otherwise, we just bail out.
>
> Bug: chromium:932953
> Change-Id: I02e91c3b652428a84a9f5c58b6691ea9b1fc44d6
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477067
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59667}
Bug: chromium:932953
Change-Id: I015ee3795f816c8eabb5b5c5cb0ee30f365cc972
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477675
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59715}
This reverts commit 1a3a2bc335.
Reason for revert: Only CL in a reverted roll (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1477147)
Original change's description:
> Fix accessor update of non-extensible maps.
>
> When installing getter/setter of non-extensible map with existing
> setter/getter of the same name, we introduce a new transition
> (so we have two transitions with the same name!). This triggers
> an assertion in map updater.
>
> This fix carefully checks that on the back-pointer path from
> non-extensible map to the extensible map there are only
> integrity level transitions. Otherwise, we just bail out.
>
> Bug: chromium:932953
> Change-Id: I02e91c3b652428a84a9f5c58b6691ea9b1fc44d6
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477067
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59667}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org
Change-Id: I9264423c605cebef87beb6c0f066e90b59faae48
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:932953
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477219
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59680}
When installing getter/setter of non-extensible map with existing
setter/getter of the same name, we introduce a new transition
(so we have two transitions with the same name!). This triggers
an assertion in map updater.
This fix carefully checks that on the back-pointer path from
non-extensible map to the extensible map there are only
integrity level transitions. Otherwise, we just bail out.
Bug: chromium:932953
Change-Id: I02e91c3b652428a84a9f5c58b6691ea9b1fc44d6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1477067
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59667}
