Use macros for factory functions, and in hydrogen code stubs.
LOG=N
BUG=v8:4124
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293533003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30206}
First step to simplify the TypeofStub. This is similar to the
optimization that we use for ToNumber and ToString on Oddballs already.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1272763005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30108}
This introduces a CopyFixedArrayAndGrow method on Factory that takes
the "grow amount" instead of the "new size" as an argument. The new
interface is safer because it allows for mutations by the GC that
potentially trim the source array.
This also fixes a bug in SharedFunctionInfo::AddToOptimizedCodeMap
where the aformentioned scenario led to unused entries within the
optimized code map.
Note that FixedArray::CopySize is hereby deprecated because it is
considered unsafe and should no longer be used.
R=hpayer@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-513507
BUG=chromium:513507
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1255173006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30012}
- Ensure frame_size is always set during allocation.
- Add DCHECKs that frame_size is a valid value
- Remove locals_count, which we don't need yet (possibly every)
- Add a newline at the end of BytecodeArray::Dissassemble
for each bytecode.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1254873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29852}
Note that there are currently no objects that require a pre-allocated
properties backing store, all such slots are in-object properties from
the begining. Hence {unused + pre_allocated - inobject == 0} holds.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1226203011
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29590}
Boolean "is_strong" parameters have begun to proliferate across areas where
strong mode semantics are different. This CL repurposes the existing
ObjectStrength enum as a replacement for them.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1144183004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28839}
Embed constant pools within their corresponding Code
objects.
This removes support for out-of-line constant pools in favor
of the new approach -- the main advantage being that it
eliminates the need to allocate and manage separate constant
pool array objects.
Currently supported on PPC and ARM. Enabled by default on
PPC only.
This yields a 6% improvment in Octane on PPC64.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com
BUG=chromium:478811
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1162993006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28801}
Only supports constructing new objects and returning size.
Followup patch will need to add ability to retrieve and
set contents in order to support structured clone.
Also removes a bunch of outdated "experimental" markers from v8.h.
BUG=v8:3340
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1157453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28637}
* Hash code is now just done with a private own symbol instead of the hidden string, which predates symbols.
* In the long run we should do all hidden properties this way and get rid of the
hidden magic 0-length string with the zero hash code. The advantages include
less complexity and being able to do things from JS in a natural way.
* Initially, the performance of weak set regressed, because it's a little harder
to do the lookup in C++. Instead of heroics in C++ to make things faster I
moved some functionality into JS and got the performance back. JS is supposed to be good at looking up named properties on objects.
* This also changes hash codes of Smis so that they are always Smis.
Performance figures are in the comments to the code review. Summary: Most of js-perf-test/Collections is neutral. Set and Map with object keys are 40-50% better. WeakMap is -5% and WeakSet is +9%. After the measurements, I fixed global proxies, which cost 1% on most tests and 5% on the weak ones :-(.
In the code review comments is a patch with an example of the heroics we could do in C++ to make lookup faster (I hope we don't have to do this. Instead of checking for the property, then doing a new lookup to insert it, we could do one lookup and handle the addition immediately). With the current benchmarks above this buys us nothing, but if we go back to doing more lookups in C++ instead of in stubs and JS then it's a win.
In a similar vein we could give the magic zero hash code to the hash code
symbol. Then when we look up the hash code we would sometimes see the table
with all the hidden properties. This dual use of the field for either the hash
code or the table with all hidden properties and the hash code is rather ugly,
and this CL gets rid of it. I'd be loath to bring it back. On the benchmarks quoted above it's slightly slower than moving the hash code lookup to JS like in this CL.
One worry is that the benchmark results above are more monomorphic than real
world code, so may be overstating the performance benefits of moving to JS. I
think this is part of a general issue we have with handling polymorphic code in
JS and any solutions there will benefit this solution, which boils down to
regular property access. Any improvement there will lift all boats.
R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149863005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28622}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer
under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added
is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer
and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is
only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical
to ArrayBuffer accesses.
LOG=N
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28594}
Reason for revert:
breaks build
Original issue's description:
> Implement SharedArrayBuffer.
>
> This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
>
> Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
>
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/57170bff7baf341c666252a7f6a49e9c08d51263
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28589}
This adds a new external type (v8::SharedArrayBuffer) that uses a JSArrayBuffer under the hood. It can be distinguished from an ArrayBuffer by the newly-added is_shared() bit.
Currently there is no difference in functionality between a SharedArrayBuffer and an ArrayBuffer. However, a future CL will add the Atomics API, which is only available on an SharedArrayBuffer. All non-atomic accesses are identical to ArrayBuffer accesses.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1136553006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28588}
Reason for revert:
I'm reverting this while working on the regression fix
Original issue's description:
> Remove the weak list of views from array buffers
>
> Instead, views have to check their array buffer for whether
> it's neutered or not.
>
> BUG=v8:3996
> R=hpayer@chromium.org,dslomov@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/5ae083a05a6743d6cb91585f449539f7846a5d8c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27995}
TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3996
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1061753008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28014}
Instead, views have to check their array buffer for whether
it's neutered or not.
BUG=v8:3996
R=hpayer@chromium.org,dslomov@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1094863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27995}
Reason for revert:
Breaks gbemu
Original issue's description:
> Reland "LayoutDescriptor should inherit from JSTypedArray"
>
> Original issue's description:
> > LayoutDescriptor should inherit from JSTypedArray
> >
> > It can't just inherit from a FixedTypedArray-like type, as we soon
> > assume that a FixedTypedArray-like type is always held by an
> > ArrayBufferView-like type
> >
> > BUG=v8:3996
> > R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> > LOG=n
>
> BUG=v8:3996
> R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> LOG=n
TBR=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3996
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1080403004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27975}
Original issue's description:
> LayoutDescriptor should inherit from JSTypedArray
>
> It can't just inherit from a FixedTypedArray-like type, as we soon
> assume that a FixedTypedArray-like type is always held by an
> ArrayBufferView-like type
>
> BUG=v8:3996
> R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> LOG=n
BUG=v8:3996
R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1094333002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27973}
Reason for revert:
breaks mjsunit on debug bots
Original issue's description:
> LayoutDescriptor should inherit from JSTypedArray
>
> It can't just inherit from a FixedTypedArray-like type, as we soon
> assume that a FixedTypedArray-like type is always held by an
> ArrayBufferView-like type
>
> BUG=v8:3996
> R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> LOG=n
TBR=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3996
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1073053006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27968}
It can't just inherit from a FixedTypedArray-like type, as we soon
assume that a FixedTypedArray-like type is always held by an
ArrayBufferView-like type
BUG=v8:3996
R=ishell@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1084793004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27964}
