Does not entirely disallow the use of 'eval' as an identifier in strong mode,
as originally proposed.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1059273004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27796}
Implements the strong mode proposal's static restrictions on the use of the
identifier 'undefined', for arrow functions. Assumes these restrictions are
intended to be identical to the restrictions on the use of 'eval and 'arguments'
in strict mode. In addition, Location variables inconsistantly named (e.g.
dupe_error_loc vs dupe_loc) are now consistently named the shorter way.
Baseline: https://codereview.chromium.org/1070633002
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1060883004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27756}
identifier. Delete unused (and now incorrect) function IsValidStrictVariable.
Implements the strong mode proposal's static restrictions on the use of the
identifier 'undefined'. Assumes these restrictions are intended to be identical
to the restrictions on the use of 'eval' and 'arguments' in strict mode. The
AllowEvalOrArgumentsAsIdentifier enum has been renamed to
AllowRestrictedIdentifiers as logic involving it is now also used for this case.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1070633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27744}
Gather references to unbound variables where the reference (VariableProxy) is
inside strong mode. Check them against the global object when a script is bound
to a context (during compilation).
This CL only checks unbound variables which are not inside lazy functions - TBD
how do we solve that; alternatives: add developer mode which disables laziness /
do the check whenever lazy functions are really compiled.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1005063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27422}
Cleanup: Better helpers, unified line splitting. Also asserting that without
strong mode, the snippets don't produce errors.
Fix: The eval related tests were wrong (we didn't make sure that the error
thrown comes from strong scoping and is not a normal runtime error).
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/993393002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27153}
We cannot yet detect use-before-declaration in general, because for that we'd
need to analyze the context when compiling. But we can detect an error case
where we first see a use, then a declaration.
For this, I also added end position tracking (needed for error messages) to
VariableProxy.
Note: the position naming is completely inconsistent: start_position &
end_position, position & end_position, pos & end_pos, beg_pos & end_pos, to name
a few. This doesn't fix all of it, but tries to unify towards start_position &
end_position whenever possible w/ minimal changes.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/943543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26880}
It would force us to make mjsunit.js strong-compatible, and that's too much for
now (for the upcoming features) and would have a ripple effect on other
tests. Especially debug-script.js which unships harmony features would break.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/930293002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26694}
1) Mutually recursive functions
2) Strong code using non-strong var before declaration.
These test cases ensure that we don't accidentally kill these wanted behaviors
when adding restrictions to strong mode.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/927143002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26671}
