Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexey Kozyatinskiy
0896586083 [inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function
Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).

BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
position. It's general treatment for most cases.
Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
- debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
  implementation,
- BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
  generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
  on first generated bytecode,
- it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
  like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
  bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
..->BuildReturnPrologue();
..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
..->Return();

In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
position when we emit return bytecode right here.

So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
functions, I'll address async functions later.

[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/

Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
2017-07-14 19:10:13 +00:00
dgozman
7bbea08f66 [inspector] Refactor protocol-test.js
This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and
gives full control over what's happening to the test code.
It also forces description for every test.

BUG=none

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
2017-05-19 00:35:45 +00:00
yangguo
aaaaa80f02 [inspector] always include user scripts in the snapshot.
V8 can bundle user scripts in the start up snapshot. These are
shared across contexts, and do not work well context groups.

R=kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6274

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2836623002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44847}
Committed: 9685cfd310
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2836623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44897}
2017-04-26 15:13:14 +00:00
yangguo
f385b747eb Revert of [inspector] always include user scripts in the snapshot. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2836623002/ )
Reason for revert:
So that https://codereview.chromium.org/2841993002/ can be reverted.

Original issue's description:
> [inspector] always include user scripts in the snapshot.
>
> V8 can bundle user scripts in the start up snapshot. These are
> shared across contexts, and do not work well context groups.
>
> R=kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:6274
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2836623002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44847}
> Committed: 9685cfd310

TBR=kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:6274

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2840923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44868}
2017-04-25 19:37:33 +00:00
yangguo
9685cfd310 [inspector] always include user scripts in the snapshot.
V8 can bundle user scripts in the start up snapshot. These are
shared across contexts, and do not work well context groups.

R=kozyatinskiy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6274

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2836623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44847}
2017-04-25 12:08:19 +00:00