Tbr: jarin@chromium.org
Change-Id: I17477e2c82398b228a366a3d1fd8eb521dd51eae
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/922270
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51317}
... or sometimes by FATAL(...) to give a better error message.
The benefit of UNREACHABLE() over CHECK(false) is that the compiler
knows that this macro will never return, hence we can omit the return
of a dummy value afterwards.
R=neis@chromium.org
Change-Id: I14e6a4f1d75f1338f481bd1520d841fd383d6202
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/832431
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50214}
Use the (D)CHECK_{EQ,NE,GT,...} macros instead of (D)CHECK with an
embedded comparison. This gives better error messages and also does the
right comparison for signed/unsigned mismatches.
This will allow us to reenable the readability/check cpplint check.
R=jarin@chromium.org
Bug: v8:6837
Change-Id: I712580c2a4326e06ee3d6d0eb4ff8c7d24f5fdb9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/671227
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48135}
There are subtle test expectations/nuances that are easy to break.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2585583006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41778}
