This pretty much rewrites the preparsed scope data collection. We used to store
the allocation result, but it's faster to just store the raw data which is
needed for deciding it later. (This way we don't need to run the allocation
algorithm for just getting this data.)
For each variable: is_used, maybe_assigned,
has_forced_context_allocation, and for each scope:
inner_scope_calls_eval_.
In addition, this CL moves data handling out of Scope and into
PreParsedScopeData where it belongs and simplifies the API for
PreParsedScopeData.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ia5a4fa52f585cd4f483ce9a92f2dd7d9754f34ed
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/451273
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43641}
A previous patch lifting the restriction on invalid escape sequences in
tagged templates had a bug when two template tokens appeared immediately
adject to each other. This moves invalid escape information from the
tokenizer state proper into the TokenDesc, preventing the overwriting
which caused this issue.
Previous CL is at
https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
BUG=v8:6029,v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2724003006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43596}
Materialized literal removal is a follow up to https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/443246
In addtion, remove ParserBase::Checkpoint; it was for restoring materialized
literal counts and expected property counts, but actually the expected property
count tracking was incorrect ("this" in arrow function param list binds to the
outside, so it's correct without the checkpoint):
(a, b = this.c = 0) => { }
BUG=
Change-Id: Ic097f6d2e7cb235166fb3a76af3bf5584bc167f0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/449733
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43579}
The pattern of creating a hidden catch scope occurs several times, so
define a helper for it.
BUG=
Change-Id: I5831378341d86d41bfb015bd3e687183cc79ac20
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/448559
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43574}
This is always the single variable declared in the catch scope.
BUG=
Change-Id: I05ccc48f57394268432c9b5b8c76f9db1b3b6312
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/448041
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43571}
BUG=
Change-Id: Id77205450d286be228b493deb69e1489a1e12895
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/445906
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43501}
BUG=v8:6022
Change-Id: I54205cb3ecc2dd31ed62e55726f0ec5fcd202c30
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/446349
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43500}
Previously, we over-approximated Scope::scope_calls_eval_ in
arrow functions: if either the outer scope or the arrow function
parameters had a direct eval call, we marked both scopes as calling
eval. This over-approximation kept getting us into trouble, though,
especially when eager or lazy parsing would disagree about the
"calls eval" bit.
This patch instead tracks eval calls accurately, using a boolean on
Scope::Snapshot that is reset as appropriately depending on whether
a particular AssignmentExpression turned out to be an arrow parameter
list or not.
BUG=chromium:691687
Change-Id: I527dc59b4d32a2797805ff26dc9f70b1311377b2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/446094
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43499}
This is more useful than always returning undefined.
BUG=v8:1569,v8:5978
Change-Id: Id10cf87f7865db1a85de412460eaead4e4bf3b62
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/446846
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43498}
With the params (a, b, ...c) the param / variable declaration order used to be
"temp, temp, c, a, b". Now it is "temp, temp, a, b, c" as you'd expect. This
makes it easier for PreParser to match the parameter order of Parser.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: I79da04ef3f812bf52c032bed6263c009fecb7988
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447677
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43490}
This is also needed so that PreParser doesn't need to gather more data for arrow
function params in order to create the uninteresting varblock scopes matching
the scopes created in Parser::BuildParameterInitializationBlock.
This cancels the changes in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/444747
which make PreParser create uninteresting scopes for the normal (non-arrow)
function "eval in default param" case.
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5516
Change-Id: I8957ac0796d8738c63492f7928bca6f00e4b4241
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/446339
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43411}
This implements the proposal at
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-template-literal-revision
staged behind a flag --harmony-template-escapes. The proposal allows
invalid octal, unicode, and hexadecimal escape sequences to appear in
tagged template literals, instead of being a syntax error. These have
a 'cooked' value of 'undefined', but are still accessible through the
'raw' property.
BUG=v8:5546
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2665513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43384}
By now lazy allocation of block scopes probably doesn't make that much sense anymore, since the memory overhead significantly reduced. Not indirecting scope() over ScopeState is faster, which is more important at this point.
BUG=v8:5209
Change-Id: I2968f01252769e7b1198a0a0876765a06ab0d3bd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/445025
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43313}
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced
"SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context"
for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen.
As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the
case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a
single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is
indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current
error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as
an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other
identifier after "let".
This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports
accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring,
and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration.
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
For functions declared in source code, the .toString() representation
will be an excerpt of the source code.
* For functions declared with the "function" keyword, the excerpt
starts at the "function" or "async" keyword and ends at the final "}".
The previous behavior would start the excerpt at the "(" of the
parameter list, and prepend a canonical `"function " + name` or
similar, which would discard comments and formatting surrounding the
function's name. Anonymous functions declared as function expressions
no longer get the name "anonymous" in their toString representation.
* For methods, the excerpt starts at the "get", "set", "*" (for
generator methods), or property name, whichever comes first.
Previously, the toString representation for methods would use a
canonical prefix before the "(" of the parameter list. Note that any
"static" keyword is omitted.
* For arrow functions and class declarations, the excerpt is unchanged.
For functions created with the Function, GeneratorFunction, or
AsyncFunction constructors:
* The string separating the parameter text and body text is now
"\n) {\n", where previously it was "\n/*``*/) {\n" or ") {\n".
* At one point, newline normalization was required by the spec here,
but that was removed from the spec, and so this CL does not do it.
Included in this CL is a fix for CreateDynamicFunction parsing. ')'
and '`' characters in the parameter string are no longer disallowed,
and Function("a=function(", "}){") is no longer allowed.
BUG=v8:4958, v8:4230
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2156303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43262}
This changes most callers of ParseScopedStatement to call a new, simpler form
of ParseStatement, which takes only |labels| and |ok|. This allows us to remove
the |legacy| attribute from ParseScopedStatement.
The only remaining caller of ParseScopedStatement is ParseIfStatement.
This patch is a strict refactoring, and should change no behavior.
R=littledan@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2699793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43259}
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1].
This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a
customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is
not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the
sequence of "let [".
[1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
Reason for revert:
Please remove the file in status file too. Breaks presubmit:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20presubmit/builds/14754
Or lets call it post-submit :(
Original issue's description:
> This is a workaround for the fact that %SetCode can "lose" the script for a js native. If the js native is re-initialized (for a Realm or something), then the source SharedFunctionInfo won't have a script anymore. Nonetheless, we may want to optimize the function. If we've compiled bytecode, then we can compile optimized code without a script.
>
> Here, we carve out a special exception for this case, so that we can turn on the --mark-shared-functions-for-tier-up.
>
> BUG=v8:5946
> R=leszeks@chromium.org
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684033007
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43240}
> Committed: 4123a3dd79TBR=leszeks@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5946
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2703553002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43242}
Produce the same scopes / variables for parameters (part 3).
This CL fixes the ordering + variable types in PreParser when there are
simple parameters + a rest parameter. In that case, Parser declares
unnamed temporaries for the non-rest params, then the rest param, then
the named variables (which are not parameters) for the non-rest params.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Change-Id: I9b006595039c8002b0508d1d2a200aa9a0f3eae0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/443527
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43241}
The parser was finalizing the inner block scope, but not clearing the
inner block's scope pointer. This doesn't (yet) have any behavioral
difference, but makes it easier to make assumptions about the structure
of the AST vs the scope chain.
R=neis@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2696233003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43233}
When --harmony-async-iteration is enabled, it is now possible to
use the for-await-of loop, which uses the Async Iteration protocol
rather than the ordinary ES6 Iteration protocol.
the Async-from-Sync Iterator object is not implemented in this CL,
and so for-await-of loops will abort execution if the iterated object
does not have a Symbol.asyncIterator() method. Async-from-Sync
Iterators are implemented seperately in https://codereview.chromium.org/2645313003/
BUG=v8:5855, v8:4483
R=neis@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2637403008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43224}
- Different places used is_simple to mean different things; renamed one.
- No need to do Scope::SetHasNoSimpleParameters multiple times.
- Normally we create VAR parameters with a name, or (for destructuring
parameters), TEMPORARY parmeters with an empty name. *Except* for
destructuring rest parameters; then we create VAR a parameter with an empty
name. This CL makes the empty-named parameter TEMPORARY instead of VAR.
- This makes it clear that Parser::DeclareFormalParameters declares exactly
those params which Parser::BuildParamerterInitializationBlock doesn't declare.
- This unification doesn't change any functionality, but it makes sense to do
since I'll need to make PreParser emulate what Parser does; this way I don't
need to emulate the weird behavior.
BUG=v8:5501
Change-Id: Ifa6c116bc5908f4e03a36e74f47558888d1582bd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/443106
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43220}
ParserBase::is_any_identifier currently does not recognise
Token::ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD as an identifier. This seems different
from what ParserBase::ParseIdentifierName does, and also prevents
"l\u0065t", unlike "let", from becoming a label.
This CL extends is_any_identifier to also accept ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD.
BUG=v8:5692
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2695973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43204}
The method ExpressionUnexpectedToken is not referenced anywhere apart from its
definition. This CL removes it.
The association with the bug below is only through discovering the dead code
when working on a fix for that bug.
BUG=v8:5692
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2688413009
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43203}
The heuristic checks for "(function", and now it also checks for
"(async function".
BUG=v8:4230
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2682173005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43120}
In order to compile eager inner functions on a background thread we need to
keep the handles created during parsing and scope analysis alive until the
background compilation is complete. In order to do that, we allocate the
handles in a deferred handle scope and keep the deferred handles alive with
a shared_ptr in the ParseInfo and CompileInfo respectively.
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2650883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43107}
Alternative approach to https://codereview.chromium.org/2667983004/, which
does not depend on implicit control flow changes from
https://codereview.chromium.org/2664083002
- Remove handling for `async function` from Parser::RewriteReturn(). This functionality
is moved to BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn(). This ensures that promise resolution
is deferred until all finally blocks are evaluated fully.
- Add a new deferred command (CMD_ASYNC_RETURN), which instructs ControlScope to
generate return code using BuildAsyncReturn rather than BuildReturn.
- Parser has a new `NewReturnStatement()` helper which determines what type of return
statement to generate based on the type of function.
BUG=v8:5896, v8:4483
R=littledan@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org, gsathya@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685683002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43104}
Move the logic into Scope::DeclareVariable to be more robust.
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2685293003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43098}
Reason for revert:
Issue on arm64:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.ports/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim/builds/5752
Original issue's description:
> [Compiler] Enable handles created during parsing and scope analysis to be deferred.
>
> In order to compile eager inner functions on a background thread we need to
> keep the handles created during parsing and scope analysis alive until the
> background compilation is complete. In order to do that, we allocate the
> handles in a deferred handle scope and keep the deferred handles alive with
> a shared_ptr in the ParseInfo and CompileInfo respectively.
>
> BUG=v8:5203
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2650883002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43091}
> Committed: 9346cd9b4cTBR=marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2687973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43093}
In order to compile eager inner functions on a background thread we need to
keep the handles created during parsing and scope analysis alive until the
background compilation is complete. In order to do that, we allocate the
handles in a deferred handle scope and keep the deferred handles alive with
a shared_ptr in the ParseInfo and CompileInfo respectively.
BUG=v8:5203
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2650883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43091}
This CL covers only the very simple cases.
BUG=v8:5516
R=vogelheim@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib6ddc90cbcf1c923a7b72493cfd029cfa835462b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/440246
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43086}
Cleans up the internalization. Also, clean up no-longer-used ast
symbols, iterator and hasInstance, which were left behind after other
refactors. Having an enum here should keep this clean in the future.
Change-Id: Id526784b0361c7a2242b21ecf2af72b0403c6ad8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/440204
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43069}
E.g.,
{ function lazy_inner(b = somevar) { let somevar; } }
If we don't produce the same scopes, PreParser thinks that the unresolved
variable inside the default parameter resolves into the variable declared inside
the function. Thus, it's not correctly recorded as a free variable.
One part is already done by https://codereview.chromium.org/2638333002 . But at
the laziness boundary, we still produced different scopes.
Unlike previously thought, this is also needed for lazy inner function
correctness, not only for "preparser scope analysis" (ie., skipping inner
functions).
BUG=v8:5938
Change-Id: I047cd43ef16478bb0f18d1f114845e7d1ab8c5f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/439345
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43044}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone. (patchset #7 id:140001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
> >
> > Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> > in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> > share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> > and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
> >
> > BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> > Committed: 14fb337200
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> > Committed: 9e7d5a6065
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
> Committed: 9fe08ec067TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679303003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43015}
Reason for revert:
False alarm, bot hiccup
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
> >
> > Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> > if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> > occurs inside a loop. For example:
> >
> > let i = 10;
> > do { var x = i } while (i--):
> >
> > As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> > as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> > syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> > occurs in a block scope.)
> >
> > BUG=v8:5636
> >
> > Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> > Committed: a33fcd663b
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
> Committed: f3ae5ccf57TBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2686663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43013}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of https://codereview.chromium.org/2679163002/.
Original issue's description:
> [parsing] Fix maybe-assigned for loop variables.
>
> Due to hoisting, the value of a 'var'-declared variable may actually change even
> if the code contains only the "initial" assignment, namely when that assignment
> occurs inside a loop. For example:
>
> let i = 10;
> do { var x = i } while (i--):
>
> As a simple and very conservative approximation of this, we explicitly mark
> as maybe-assigned any non-lexical variable whose "declaration" does not
> syntactically occur in the function scope. (In the example above, it
> occurs in a block scope.)
>
> BUG=v8:5636
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2673403003
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42989}
> Committed: a33fcd663bTBR=marja@chromium.org,adamk@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5636
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2679263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43010}
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert because of revert needed for https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Original issue's description:
> Reland: [Parse] ParseInfo owns the parsing Zone.
>
> Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
> in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
> share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
> and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
>
> BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
> Committed: 14fb337200
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
> Committed: 9e7d5a6065TBR=marja@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43008}
Moves ownership of the parsing Zone to ParseInfo with a shared_ptr. This is
in preperation for enabling background compilation jobs for inner functions
share the AST in the outer-function's parse zone memory (read-only), with the
and zone being released when all compilation jobs have completed.
BUG=v8:5203,v8:5215
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42993}
Committed: 14fb337200
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2632123006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42996}
