Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dgozman
7bbea08f66 [inspector] Refactor protocol-test.js
This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and
gives full control over what's happening to the test code.
It also forces description for every test.

BUG=none

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
2017-05-19 00:35:45 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
f61facfdaf [inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains
Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved.
For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same.

BUG=v8:6189
R=dgozman@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198}
Committed: e118462f18
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45266}
2017-05-11 19:21:24 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
fe0d5c7ca8 Revert of [inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002/ )
Reason for revert:
CHECK is too strict.

Original issue's description:
> [inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains
>
> Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved.
> For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same.
>
> BUG=v8:6189
> R=dgozman@chromium.org
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198}
> Committed: e118462f18

TBR=dgozman@chromium.org,alexclarke@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=v8:6189

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868423004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45242}
2017-05-10 21:24:37 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
e118462f18 [inspector] use creation stack trace as parent for async call chains
Creation stack trace points to the place where callback was actually chained, scheduled points where parent promise was resolved.
For async tasks without creation stack (e.g. setTimeout) we continue to use scheduled as creation since usually they are the same.

BUG=v8:6189
R=dgozman@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2868493002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45198}
2017-05-09 14:43:15 +00:00
kozyatinskiy
f2bd913cd4 [inspector] better stacks for promises
- we should always set creation async stack if it's available regardless existing of current parent async stack,
- we should cleanup parent link iff there is no creation and schedule async stack for parent.

Let's consider example: Promise.resolve().then(x => x).then(x => x), there is three promises which will call following instrumentation:
1) created #1 (Promise.resolve()) - collected stack #1
2) scheduled #1 - collected stack #2
3) created #2 with #1 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #3
4) created #3 with #2 as parent (first .then) - collected stack #4
5) started #2 - use stack #2 as scheduled
6) scheduled #2 - collected stack #6
7) finished #2
8) started #3 - use stack #6 as scheduled
9) scheduled #3 - collected stack #7
10) finished #3

If we collect stacks between step 4 and 5, it's possible to collect scheduled stack #2 but still have creation stack for #2 - stack #3 - so we always need to add creation event if scheduled is collected.

If we collect stacks between created and scheduled we should not remove parent link even if parent was not scheduled yet.

BUG=v8:6189
R=dgozman@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2844753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44990}
2017-04-28 21:07:01 +00:00