Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tobias Tebbi
205860b147 [csa] re-schedule CSA graph
This CL is an experiment to get more performance data from the perf-bots
and will likely lead to regressions. The try-bots (see patcheset 9)
indicate some regressions, but it doesn't seem too bad.

Change-Id: Ia173ab20ee2a4904663db0f4ca2ffb196b203c77
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1319763
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57483}
2018-11-13 17:12:01 +00:00
Clemens Hammacher
3cb376dc83 Make CallInterfaceDescriptor isolate-independent
Currently each isolate stores its own array of
{CallInterfaceDescriptorData}. This array has size 173, and each entry
has 40 bytes. That's already 7kB per isolate.
Additionally, each {CallInterfaceDescriptorData} allocates two
heap-allocated arrays, which probably add up to more than the static
size of the {CallInterfaceDescriptorData}. Note that all the
{CallInterfaceDescriptorData} instances are initialized eagerly on
isolate creation.

Since {CallInterfaceDescriptor} is totally isolate independent itself,
this CL refactors the current design to avoid a copy of them per
isolate, and instead shares them process-wide. Still, we need to free
the allocated heap arrays when the last isolate dies to avoid leaks.
This can probably be refactored later by statically initializing more
and avoiding the heap allocations all together.

This refactoring will also allow us to use {CallInterfaceDescriptor}s
from wasm background compilation threads, which are not bound to any
isolate.

R=mstarzinger@chromium.org, titzer@chromium.org

Bug: v8:6600
Change-Id: If8625b89951eec8fa8986b49a5c166e874a72494
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1100879
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53803}
2018-06-18 15:55:53 +00:00
Jaroslav Sevcik
f53dfd934d Replace array index masking with the poisoning approach.
The idea is to mark all the branches and loads participating in array
bounds checks, and let them contribute-to/use the poisoning register.
In the code, the marks for array indexing operations now contain
"Critical" in their name. By default (--untrusted-code-mitigations),
we only instrument the "critical" operations with poisoning.

With that in place, we also remove the array masking approach based
on arithmetic.

Since we do not propagate the poison through function calls,
we introduce a node for poisoning an index that is passed through
function call - the typical example is the bounds-checked index
that is passed to the CharCodeAt builtin.

Most of the code in this CL is threads through the three levels of
protection (safe, critical, unsafe) for loads, branches and flags.

Bug: chromium:798964

Change-Id: Ief68e2329528277b3ba9156115b2a6dcc540d52b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/995413
Commit-Queue: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52883}
2018-04-30 13:22:44 +00:00
Tobias Tebbi
1ef6c4374e [turbofan] unify interpreter and JIT speculation poisoning
This CL changes the poisoning in the interpreter to use the
infrastructure used in the JIT.

This does not change the original flag semantics:

--branch-load-poisoning enables JIT mitigations as before.

--untrusted-code-mitigation enables the interpreter mitigations
  (now realized using the compiler back-end), but does not enable
  the back-end based mitigations for the Javascript JIT. So in effect
  --untrusted-code-mitigation makes the CSA pipeline for bytecode handlers
  use the same mechanics (including changed register allocation) that
  --branch-load-poisoning enables for the JIT.

Bug: chromium:798964
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: If7f6852ae44e32e6e0ad508e9237f24dec7e5b27
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/928881
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52243}
2018-03-27 12:55:28 +00:00
Toon Verwaest
1067026ff1 Remove ComputeFlags, simply pass in Code::Kind instead of Code::Flags
TBR: ofrobots@google.com, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: 
Change-Id: I6cb0704acabf9a7f2334de539a6600db8607baef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/691720
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48237}
2017-09-29 15:37:27 +00:00
pan.deng@intel.com
d8864701fd [csa] Add constant folding more universally to CodeAssembler operators
Contributed by kanghua.yu@intel.com.

Bug: None
Change-Id: I5651ef38eb0c08deb97770a5eaa985dba2dab9a9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/604648
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Pan Deng <pan.deng@intel.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47968}
2017-09-12 10:03:10 +00:00