Commit Graph

75 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
adamk
163419e8fa Remove --harmony-arrow-functions flag
Arrow functions have been enabled by default since the 4.5 branch.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1373633002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31031}
2015-09-30 19:50:40 +00:00
neis
d3ef8f4b95 [es6] Ship rest parameters.
R=rossberg
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371963002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30970}
2015-09-28 11:19:35 +00:00
conradw
24ec2a0baa [strong] Implement revised strong class semantics
Weak classes can inherit from strong ones again, a strong base class makes
instances strong.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1347243004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30867}
2015-09-22 16:34:52 +00:00
bmeurer
db2ba190db [runtime] Replace many buggy uses of %_CallFunction with %_Call.
The semantics of the %_CallFunction intrinsic seem to be very unclear,
which resulted in a lot of bugs. Especially the combination with
%IsSloppyModeFunction is always a bug, because the receiver would be
wrapped in the wrong context. So the %IsSloppyModeFunction helper is
gone now, and many of the buggy uses of %_CallFunction are also
eliminated.

If you ever need to call something with a different receiver, then
%_Call is your friend now. It does what you want and implements the
call sequence fully (and correct).

BUG=v8:4413
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1325573004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30634}
2015-09-08 13:35:32 +00:00
conradw
db440dfe8d [strong] weak classes can't inherit from strong ones
Prerequisite for sealing strong class instances.

Depends on https://codereview.chromium.org/1314203002/

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1316333002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30541}
2015-09-02 11:36:20 +00:00
conradw
05f01b3f8e [strong] Class constructor bodies cannot contain "use strong" directive
Since the constructor is also the class object itself, allowing it to
retroactively become a strong object would have unintuitive consequences
wrt the strength of the other functions of the class, and whether instances
would be considered instances of a strong class.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1314203002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30519}
2015-09-01 18:29:35 +00:00
conradw
77394fa05a [parser] disallow language mode directive in body of function with non-simple parameters
TC39 agreed to disallow "use strict" directives in function body when
non-simple parameter lists are used.

This is a continuation of caitp's CL https://codereview.chromium.org/1281163002/
with some refactorings removed for now.

Still TODO: there is a lot of duplication between the is_simple field of
FormalParametersBase and the NonSimpleParameter property ExpressionClassifier
keeps track of. It should be possible to remove the former with a minor
refactoring of arrow function parsing. This will be attempted in a follow-up CL.

BUG=
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1300103005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30388}
2015-08-26 14:59:19 +00:00
adamk
b7726c447a Delete --harmony-computed-property-names flag
It was shipped in V8 4.4.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1273543002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30038}
2015-08-05 21:32:38 +00:00
conradw
24e1bcbfea [strong] dot prototypes of strong class literals should be strong objects
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1270423003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30032}
2015-08-05 15:38:06 +00:00
caitpotter88
dfe2dd835a [parser] use-strict directives in function body affect init block
BUG=
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1234213004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29710}
2015-07-16 16:45:06 +00:00
conradw
f996793ec0 [strong] class objects created in strong mode have their prototype frozen
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1235983002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29646}
2015-07-14 11:31:47 +00:00
conradw
4927c82ffe [strong] class objects created in strong mode are frozen
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1225303005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29615}
2015-07-13 15:01:02 +00:00
conradw
2f981db039 [strong] Strong classes can't extend null
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1235883002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29606}
2015-07-13 12:40:38 +00:00
conradw
dbda22fdd1 [strong] Add test for strong load involving proxies
Keeping this CL separate in case there are more GC-stress problems.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1217543006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29449}
2015-07-02 15:24:58 +00:00
conradw
37bf0481de [strong] Add tests for loading from super, loading with access checks
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219663009

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29448}
2015-07-02 15:23:48 +00:00
adamk
62572e011e [es6] Ensure that for-in/of loops have a proper TDZ for their lexically-bound variables
The enumerable expression in a for-in/of loop is supposed to have a TDZ for any
lexically bound names in that loop (there can be more than one with destructuring).

This patch accomplishes this with an almost-correct desugaring. The only thing missing
is proper debugger support (the let declarations added by the desugaring, while invisible
to code due to shadowing, are visible to the debugger).

BUG=v8:4210
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29396}
2015-07-01 00:27:30 +00:00
machenbach
365ff33234 Revert of [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks (patchset #4 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Breaks gc stress:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20GC%20Stress%20-%202/builds/3968

Original issue's description:
> [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks
>
> Followup for https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/
>
> These seem to already function correctly without the need for further runtime
> changes.
>
> There will be a final follow-up for interceptors.
>
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/ea4e568363f48955e7de6b538e559132e9899c86
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29389}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1218123003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29390}
2015-06-30 18:43:01 +00:00
conradw
ea4e568363 [strong] Add tests for loading from proxy, super, with access checks
Followup for https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/

These seem to already function correctly without the need for further runtime
changes.

There will be a final follow-up for interceptors.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1193633003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29389}
2015-06-30 17:13:21 +00:00
conradw
7281f80151 [strong] Implement strong property access semantics
Revert "Revert relanded strong property access CL"

Regression issues should be solved. Initial patchset is the original, subsequent patchsets are the fixing modifications.

This reverts commit 4ac7be5656.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1199983002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29384}
2015-06-30 15:24:43 +00:00
conradw
f5cc091f8f [strong] Implement strong mode semantics for the count operation.
Also fixes a crankshaft bug with strong implicit conversions.

It turns out that the implicit conversion of oddball values
is smushed into so many places in crankshaft that it would
have been pretty invasive surgery to make everything fall
out naturally.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1216463003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29381}
2015-06-30 14:22:08 +00:00
arv
353b40e980 [es6] Remove harmony-classes flag
Move class tests to es6 directory

BUG=v8:3330
LOG=N
R=adamk

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1213813003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29336}
2015-06-26 21:16:58 +00:00
conradw
4ac7be5656 Revert relanded strong property access CL
Reason:
Regressions in various benchmarks.

Revert "Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002/)"

This reverts commit 41405c0470.

Revert "X87: Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access."

This reverts commit 48de5f4d6b.

Revert "Fix overlapping KeyedLoadIC bitfield."

This reverts commit 4e6c956abf.

Revert "MIPS64: Fix 'Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access'."

This reverts commit 74f97b0d2a.

BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1199493002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29166}
2015-06-19 19:00:53 +00:00
conradw
41405c0470 Revert of Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002/)
Reason for revert:
Issue was ultimately caused/fixed by https://codereview.chromium.org/1194673002/

Original issue's description:
> Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #23 id:460001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> Speculative revert, maybe breaks GC-stress
>
> http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20GC%20Stress%20-%20custom%20snapshot/builds/808
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access
> >
> > Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.
> >
> > To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super
> >
> > BUG=v8:3956
> > LOG=N
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/85dbfb9a389e7b21bd2a63862202ee97fc5d7982
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}
>
> TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:3956
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/407657b706711fd5f8d417841e24b284886f3776
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29115}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1185343005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29122}
2015-06-18 17:17:07 +00:00
conradw
407657b706 Revert of [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access (patchset #23 id:460001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002/)
Reason for revert:
Speculative revert, maybe breaks GC-stress

http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20GC%20Stress%20-%20custom%20snapshot/builds/808

Original issue's description:
> [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access
>
> Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.
>
> To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super
>
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/85dbfb9a389e7b21bd2a63862202ee97fc5d7982
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}

TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mvstanton@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1189153002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29115}
2015-06-18 13:40:20 +00:00
conradw
85dbfb9a38 [strong] Implement strong mode restrictions on property access
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on property access.

To be fully explored in a followup: proxies, interceptors, access checks, load from super

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1168093002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29109}
2015-06-18 11:55:45 +00:00
conradw
3f5cd321f1 [strong] create strong array literals
Copied, with permission, from https://codereview.chromium.org/1151853003/

Initial patch set is an unmodified copy, rebased on top of related fixes from
https://codereview.chromium.org/1158933002/

Subsequent patch sets contain fixes for remaining bugs in the CL.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1152093003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28760}
2015-06-02 11:46:15 +00:00
conradw
b14305c161 [strong] Implement per-object restrictions behaviour of delete operator
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the behaviour of the
delete operator for strong objects.

Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.

Attempt 2, last version did not work with API.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1156573002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28724}
2015-06-01 11:39:16 +00:00
conradw
6edc3e3179 [strong] Implement per-object restrictions behaviour of property freezing
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on changing a strong object's
writable, non-configurable property to non-writable.

Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1142393003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28698}
2015-05-29 11:33:29 +00:00
conradw
629d275073 [strong] Implement per-object restrictions behaviour for prototype setting
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the ability of user code
to modify the prototype of strong objects.

Setting the strong bit is still wip, so this change will only affect those
objects that have the bit correctly set. The tests reflect this, and will be
expanded as more objects can be marked as strong.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1143623002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28664}
2015-05-27 17:06:43 +00:00
conradw
092acb2b96 [strong] fix strong array, object prototypes
Strong Object/Array literals are currently being created with incorrect
internal prototypes. This CL fixes this and extends the test suite to check.

BUG=
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1158933002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28655}
2015-05-27 13:55:14 +00:00
rossberg
65bea197ee [strong] cache strong object literal maps
Also, add more literal tests.

R=dslomov@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1145213005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28579}
2015-05-22 10:51:29 +00:00
rossberg
2fa664fbe2 Reland "[strong] Object literals create strong objects"
(patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1134333005/)"

This reverts commit 81c080ef8e.
Patchset #1 is the original CL.
Patchset #2 fixes a handlification bug that caused the crash.

R=dslomov@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1143813002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28497}
2015-05-20 07:07:42 +00:00
arv
78f0452d31 [strong] Function arity check should be based on required parameters
Also check whether the arguments count is smaller than the number of
required parameters which is the same as the SharedFunctionInfo length.

BUG=v8:4102
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1133933003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28491}
2015-05-19 18:44:05 +00:00
machenbach
81c080ef8e Revert of [strong] Object literals create strong objects (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1134333005/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Segmentation fault on arm64 with nosnap:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug%20-%201/builds/1990

Original issue's description:
> [strong] Object literals create strong objects
>
> R=dslomov@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fe6598cffb82ec4180dcc2e2310e77d07a803f96
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28444}

TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1135493006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28464}
2015-05-19 07:35:54 +00:00
arv
55a7500343 [strong] Fix super in strong classes
The functions of strong classes are born non extensible. But, when
the class is created we need to add an own private symbol representing
the [[HomeObject]] slot in the spec.

Like for the hidden_string property, we allow adding private own
symbols to non extensible objects.

BUG=v8:4077
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1138603003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28447}
2015-05-18 14:18:38 +00:00
rossberg
fe6598cffb [strong] Object literals create strong objects
R=dslomov@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1134333005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28444}
2015-05-18 13:23:17 +00:00
rossberg
9be59492f9 [strong] Introduce strong bit
Only set on strong functions so far to test basic operation.

R=dslomov@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1138243002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28396}
2015-05-13 13:31:12 +00:00
arv
547a641e2c [strong] Add more function arity tests
This is a follow up to https://codereview.chromium.org/1115263004/

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1141603002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28379}
2015-05-12 17:37:25 +00:00
conradw
03ef40b46c [strong] Disallow implicit conversions for comparison
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on implicit conversions
for the binary >, >=, <, and <= operators.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1130283002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28370}
2015-05-12 15:23:50 +00:00
arv
3226e98020 [strong] Check arity of functions
In strong mode it is an error to call a function with too few
arguments.

This is enforced inside the ArgumentsAdaptorTrampoline.

This does not yet handle rest parameters

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
R=rossberg@chromium.org, dslomov@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1115263004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28346}
2015-05-11 17:20:45 +00:00
conradw
97bee8e964 [strong] Fix inlining issue
The Hydrogen representation for binops was never changed to care about the
language mode. We thought this was ok, but it turns out we need to keep track
of it to make sure inlining doesn't mess with the "strongness" of binops.

Also added more rigorous inlining testing.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1123043002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28253}
2015-05-06 10:40:38 +00:00
conradw
dea0d9b59e [strong] Disallow implicit conversions for add
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on implicit conversions
for the binary + operator. Test suite is also cleaned up/refactored to allow
easier testing of the comparison operators in the future.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1109223004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28159}
2015-04-30 11:46:08 +00:00
conradw
6988aec61f [strong] Disallow implicit conversions for bitwise ops, shifts
See https://codereview.chromium.org/1092353002/

Due to parser rewrites, also implements restrictions for unary ~.

Still to come, implementing restrictions for binary + and comparison.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1102923002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28104}
2015-04-28 11:19:49 +00:00
conradw
ae7ce701ae [strong] Disallow implicit conversions for binary arithmetic operations
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on
implicit conversions for binary arithmetic operations, not
including the + special case. Adds some infrastructure
for future implementation of the restrictions for other
operators.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1092353002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28045}
2015-04-24 12:32:41 +00:00
marja
ddd3f318c7 [strong] Stricter check for referring to other classes inside methods.
Add the restriction that both classes must be declared inside the same
consectutive class declaration batch.

Dependency analysis not implemented yet.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1060913005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28032}
2015-04-23 14:04:47 +00:00
machenbach
1ea118d592 Revert of Revert of [strong] checking of this & super in constructors (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1105453002/)
Reason for revert:
Was an infrastructure problem.

Original issue's description:
> Revert of [strong] checking of this & super in constructors (patchset #7 id:110001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1024063002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> [Sheriff] Breaks mac gc stress:
> http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Mac%20GC%20Stress/builds/1024
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [strong] checking of this & super in constructors
> >
> > R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
> > BUG=v8:3956
> > LOG=N
> >
> > Enforces for constructors that
> > - the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
> > - the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
> > - both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
> > - 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
> > - 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'
> >
> > Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/580d66bcda66220d2f3062ac58daf925436df74c
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}
>
> TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:3956

TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1073103004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28001}
2015-04-22 11:04:13 +00:00
machenbach
b3875aacbb Revert of [strong] checking of this & super in constructors (patchset #7 id:110001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1024063002/)
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Breaks mac gc stress:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Mac%20GC%20Stress/builds/1024

Original issue's description:
> [strong] checking of this & super in constructors
>
> R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Enforces for constructors that
> - the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
> - the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
> - both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
> - 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
> - 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'
>
> Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/580d66bcda66220d2f3062ac58daf925436df74c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}

TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1105453002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27991}
2015-04-22 08:00:27 +00:00
rossberg
580d66bcda [strong] checking of this & super in constructors
R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Enforces for constructors that
- the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
- the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
- both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
- 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
- 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'

Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1024063002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}
2015-04-21 16:34:29 +00:00
marja
2dc0f2ec01 [strong] Allow mutually recursive classes.
The previous restrictions were overshooting (didn't allow a class to refer to a
later class under any circumstances); after this CL we're undershooting (allow
referring to any class from inside a method).

Implementing the correct checks (allow referring only if the class declarations
are in a consecutive block and if there's no dependency cycle) will be
implemented as a follow up.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1087543004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27888}
2015-04-16 14:12:52 +00:00
conradw
d8bccfe974 [strong] Implement static restrictions on switch statement
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the syntax of the
switch statement. Also fixes a minor bug with empty statements in strong
mode and improves StrongUndefinedArrow parser synch tests.

BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1084983002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27885}
2015-04-16 13:29:20 +00:00