Fix error message printed by Runtime_ThrowCalledNonCallable.
As noted on the bug, this has a slight problem in that it will always
print that "asyncIterator" was not callable for GetIterator with an
async IteratorType, though it may be referring to a different call.
This issue is present regardless of the change I introduced to perform
this desugaring in the BytecodeGenerator.
BUG=v8:6187
R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
Change-Id: I2077b7cd5976d9d9ba044f0dff44ee8c312d1263
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/470806
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44543}
Return a structured objet with the type profile
information.
Move the test from message to mjsunit.
BUG=v8:5933
Change-Id: I3e1c592697924d87f82d46b0ddbdb6d82d9c8467
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/464847
Reviewed-by: Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Franziska Hinkelmann <franzih@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44364}
Add the source position to variables if they are parameters.
Collect type information for parameters and return values.
Index the types by their corresponding source position. For the
types of return values, use the function end as source position.
Sample output for a function with 2 parameters (at source
position 252 and 258, and function end at 443)
*************
Function: testFunction
252:
Object
number
string
number
258:
undefined
boolean
undefined
undefined
443:
Object
number
string
number
*************
BUG=v8:5933
Change-Id: I3b8749afcac706c1834146abf1b5b4a3fd130fb6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/461919
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Franziska Hinkelmann <franzih@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44299}
This removes the debug information (i.e. direct references to the parser
source file) from the message, hence making messages consistent between
release and debug mode. The debug information can now be printed via the
new --trace-asm-parser flag.
Also adds two message test cases, showcasing that expected output can
now be tested. More tests might be added to the message test suite later
whenever it makes sense.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6127
Change-Id: I348044356896442ff9be2d638a564c82fec7a51c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/461942
Commit-Queue: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44248}
If used, the TypeProfileSlot is always added as the first slot and its
index is constant. If other slots are added before the TypeProfileSlot,
this number changes.
BUG=v8:5933
Change-Id: I57bc6bea3c48804af28c2d1dafe6a52bdd7d12e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/459511
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Franziska Hinkelmann <franzih@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44149}
This adds a --stress-validate-asm flag intended to stress test the
validator by running against every single function, independent of
whether a "use asm" directive is present. It mainly tests negative
cases because barely any function in our test corpus will be a valid
module according to the asm.js spec.
R=bradnelson@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6127
Change-Id: Id04b0440628134d4e81c9bb4d71039f940fc9a83
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/457039
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44055}
Handle fall-off returns and returns inside try blocks.
Store the type-profile feedback slot on the FunctionLiteral
rather than on every return statement.
Next steps:
* Store entries in nexus that can be identified as 'return' (rather than parameter or assignment)
* Collect types for parameters and assignments
* Distinguish multiple parameters and assignments correctly
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2764113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44014}
Add a test case as reminder for future work.
The return statement is in a try
finally and is never used when returning. The type should
not be collected.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2765863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44006}
Collect type information of return values.
Use *one* feedback slot per function for all its return
statements. For assignments, we currently use
several slots per function, because not all
assignments refer to the same variable.
Instead of the variable names, pass the
source location and print the function name.
Add an integration test for --type-profile that checks
for crashes.
Remove type feedback for assignments for now as it convolutes the output.
************ Function with 2 return statements ********
function testFunction(param, flag) {
// We want to test 2 different return positions in one function.
if (flag) {
var first_var = param;
return first_var;
}
var second_var = param;
return second_var;
}
testFunction({});
testFunction(123, true);
testFunction('hello');
testFunction(undefined);
*******************************************************
************* Sample Output ***************************
Function: testFunction
424: Object
374: number
424: string
424: undefined
*******************************************************
Missing work:
* Handle fall-off returns
* Collect types for parameters
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2755973002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43956}
Separate the function that prints type profile with
--type-profile from the one that collects type profile.
The name needs to be stored in the feedback vector as well. I'll make a
follow up CL that stores the relevant information, so it can
be printed later.
BUG=v8:5935
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2757993002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43929}
Collect type information for JavaScript variables and display it
in Chrome DevTools.
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1O1uepXZXBI6IwiawTrYC3ohhiNgzkyTdjn3R8ysbYgk/edit?usp=sharing
When debugging JavaScript, it’s helpful to know the type of
a variable, parameter, and return values. JavaScript is
dynamically typed, and for complex
source code it’s often hard to infer types. With type profiling, we
can provide type information to JavaScript developers.
This CL is a proof of concept. It collects type profile for
assignments and simply prints the types to stdout.
The output looks something like this:
#my_var1
#Object
#number
#string
#number
#undefined
#string
#Object
#Object
We use an extra slot in the feedback vector of assignments to
carry the list of types for that assignment. The extra slot is
only added when the flag --type-profile is given.
Missing work:
* Collect data for parameters and return values (currently only assignments).
* Remove duplicates from the list of collected types and use a common base class.
* Add line numbers or source position instead of the variable name.
For now, has a test that compares the stdout of --type-profile in test/message. We
will remove this test when --type-profile is fully integrated in
the debugger protocol. Adding
the test in test/inspector does not work, because the inspector
test itself consists of JavaScript code that would convolute the
output and be non-deterministic under stress.
BUG=v8:5935
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2707873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43866}
The order in which things were done wasn't quite correct and lead
to wrong behaviour for certain circular module graphs.
BUG=v8:1569,chromium:694566
Change-Id: I291186e261268c853a30ad891ff362904e0b28ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447399
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43497}
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced
"SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context"
for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen.
As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the
case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a
single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is
indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current
error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as
an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other
identifier after "let".
This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports
accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring,
and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration.
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1].
This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a
customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is
not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the
sequence of "let [".
[1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement
BUG=v8:5686
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
Also updated some tests due to the change. The general pattern is when a
trailing comma is expected to cause a SyntaxError, an additional comma was
added.
BUG=v8:5051
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2638513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42826}
The current logic in Isolate::GetLocationFromStackTrace just ignores
wasm frames, making the computed location point to the first javascript
frame, like this:
test.js:17: RuntimeError: divide by zero
module.exports.main();
^
RuntimeError: divide by zero
at main (<WASM>[1]+5)
at test.js:17:16
This CL not only fixes the location to point to the top-most wasm
frame, but also exposes to the embedder that the script of that location
is a wasm script, allowing for custom printing of wasm locations.
The Shell::ReportException method now checks for this flag, and prints
wasm locations like this:
<WASM>[0]+5: RuntimeError: divide by zero
RuntimeError: divide by zero
at main (<WASM>[0]+5)
at test/message/wasm-trap.js:15:16
R=titzer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:613110
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2563673002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41640}
When an octal escape sequence is in a string in strict mode:
- Octal literals are not allowed in strict mode.
+ Octal escape sequences are not allowed in strict mode.
When an octal escape sequence is in a template string:
- Octal literals are not allowed in template strings.
+ Octal escape sequences are not allowed in template strings.
BUG=v8:4973
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2551633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41560}
This makes sure call-site rendering for certain {TypeError} messages is
based on the correct underlying {JSFunction}, even when inlined frames
are present. Only the {FrameSummary} knows the exact function.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
TEST=message/regress/regress-crbug-661579
BUG=chromium:661579
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2521103005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41264}
This fixes the message reported via the {TypeError} thrown when trying
to call a non-constructable function as a constructor. Also adds some
more related message tests for similar exceptions.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
TEST=message/call-non-constructable
BUG=chromium:661579
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2523803003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41220}
It originates from the era where we used to run a separate preparse step
before parsing and store the function data. Now the usage of preparser
is something completely different, so this flag doesn't make sense any
more.
In addition, this way we get more test coverage for preparser (for small
scripts).
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2513563002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41110}
We used to point elsewhere, for instance the right-hand-side of an assignment.
Small limitation: Since variable proxies only have a start position, not an end
position, the best we can do is point at the first character. (We cannot rely
on the scanner's last token position because Declare may be called long after
the variable has been scanned.)
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5572
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2447143005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40613}
For instance, when an import cannot be resolved, actually
point at the corresponding import statement.
BUG=v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2451153002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40594}
In case of duplicate exports, always report the error for the very last
one.
(Fixed a bug.)
BUG=v8:5358,v8:1569
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2340953002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39434}
This removes two bits of duplication:
- Parsing of each AssignmentExpression, which previously was called
first outside the loop and then inside the loop.
- Parsing of arrow rest parameters, which previously was handled
separately for the one-arg and N-arg cases.
The only change in behavior is in a few error messages.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2279363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39030}
Tail calls don't make sense from async functions and generators, as
each activation of these functions needs to make a new, distnict,
non-reused generator object. These tail calls are not required per
spec. This patch disables both syntactic and implicit tail calls
in async functions and generators.
R=neis
BUG=v8:5301,chromium:639270
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2278413003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38986}
Stack trace generation requires access to the receiver; and while the
receiver is already on the stack, we cannot determine its position
during stack trace generation (it's stored in argv[0], and argc is only
stored in a callee-saved register).
This patch grants access to the receiver by pushing argc onto builtin
exit frames as an extra argument. Compared to simply pushing the
receiver, this requires an additional dereference during stack trace
generation, but one fewer during builtin calls.
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106883003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37500}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel;tryserver.v8:v8_linux_nosnap_dbg
Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37416}
Reason for revert:
Looks like this breaks on nosnap: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug/builds/7626
Original issue's description:
> [builtins] New frame type for exits to C++ builtins
>
> Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
> frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
> show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
>
> Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
> not skipped during stack trace construction.
>
> BUG=v8:4815
> R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/3c60c6b105f39344f93a8407f41534e5e60cf19a
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4815
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2106113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37394}
Prior to this commit, calls to C++ builtins created standard exit
frames, which are skipped when constructing JS stack traces. In order to
show these calls on traces, we introduce a new builtin exit frame type.
Builtin exit frames contain target and new.target on the stack and are
not skipped during stack trace construction.
BUG=v8:4815
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2090723005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37384}
Unlike previous implementation where the 'continue' keyword was a feature of a return statement the keyword is now recognized as a part of expression. Error reporting was significantly improved.
--harmony-explicit-tailcalls option is now orthogonal to --harmony-tailcalls so we can test both modes at the same time.
This CL also adds %GetExceptionDetails(exception) that fetches hidden |start_pos| and |end_pos| values from the exception object.
BUG=v8:4915
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1928203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36024}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
This prepares for pulling chromium's build as dependency for
gn. After this, the files in build and gypfiles need to stay
in sync until chromium is updated.
BUG=chromium:474921
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1848553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35898}
The parser uses a try-catch in order to record when the client of an iterator
throws. The exception then used to get rethrown via 'throw', which
unfortunately resulted in the original exception message object getting
overwritten.
This CL solves this as follows:
- add a clear_pending_message flag to TryCatchStatement (set to true in normal
cases),
- set clear_pending_message to false for the TryCatchStatement used in iterator
finalization
- change full-codegen, turbofan, and the interpreter to emit the ClearPendingMessage call
only when the flag is set,
- replace 'throw' with '%ReThrow' in the iterator finalization code, thus
reusing the (not-cleared) pending message
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4875
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1842953003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35226}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
This rebaselines all our internal tests for error messages thrown by the
implementation of 'instanceof' to the new ES6 semantics. It also applies
a minor rephrasing to the messages in question.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4447
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1822663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34940}
It was never being set to false in production (though it was in test-parsing.cc,
due to that test having its own flag-setting logic).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1815033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34878}
test262 "negative" test expectations list which exception is thrown. The ES2017
draft specification is very specific about which exception class is thrown
from which path, and V8 works hard to be correct with respect to that spec.
Previously, the test262 test runner would accept any nonzero status code,
such as from a crash, or a FAIL printed out, for a negative test. This
patch makes negative tests check for the right answer using a quick-and-dirty
parsing of the exception printing from d8 to find the exception class.
It invokes d8 in a way to get a status code of 0 from thrown exceptions
so that 'negative' tests aren't actually implemented by negating the output.
Amazingly, this didn't catch any test262 failures, but I verified the extra
checking interactively by changing a negative test to expect a different type
and saw it fail.
BUG=v8:4803
R=machenbach
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1766503002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34763}
This moves the last remaining JS file based tests out of the "preparser"
suite. The tests in question all are expected to parse normally and not
throw any exception. This also deprecates the ability of the test suite
to run anything else outside Python templated tests.
R=adamk@chromium.org
TEST=preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1782173005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34753}
This converts another test case that is expected to throw a TypeError
but no SyntaxError to have better test coverage (exact message is being
checked now).
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1786623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34715}
This converts existing "preparser" tests that expect a certain exception
message to be produced into "message" tests. Thereby we get much better
coverage because the former test suite degraded by now to just check
whether each test case threw or not, the exception message was not being
checked at all.
This also deprecates the ability of "preparser" to specify that single
test cases based on JS files are expected to throw, "messages" is far
superior, use that test suite instead.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
TEST=message,preparser
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784013003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34713}
This also runs the message test suite against Ignition. By now most of
the source positions (and exception messages) are accurate, the failing
ones have been blacklisted.
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1783773003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34708}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
This avoids spending lots of time in Scope::RemoveUnresolved for very long
variable declaration lists.
BUG=v8:4699
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1655313003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34047}
Reason for revert:
Crash fixed by https://codereview.chromium.org/1564923007
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
> >
> > This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> > changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> > function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> > themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> > riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> > pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
> >
> > R=adamk@chromium.org
> > BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> > LOG=Y
> > CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
>
> TBR=adamk@chromium.org
> # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
> LOG=Y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/adac5956c6216056a211cfaa460a00ac1500d8f8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33189}
Reason for revert:
Causes frequent crashes in Canary: chromium:537816
Original issue's description:
> Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode function hoisting, let, class
>
> This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
> changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
> function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
> themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
> riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
> pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
>
> R=adamk@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
> LOG=Y
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/fcff8588a5a01587643d6c2507c7b882c78a2957
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
TBR=adamk@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305,chromium:537816
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1565263002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33162}
This patch doesn't ship all features of ES2015 variable/scoping
changes, notably omitting the removal of legacy const. I think
function hoisting, let and class in sloppy mode can stand to
themselves as a package, and the legacy const change is much
riskier and more likely to be reverted, so my intention is to
pursue those as a separate, follow-on patch.
R=adamk@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4285,v8:3305
LOG=Y
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1551443002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33133}
These constructors always go through C++ at least twice anyway, so
there's not really a point in trying to implement them in JavaScript.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:535408
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1548623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33012}
This will make sure that message tests cover both the parser and preparser
paths, just as we do for parsing-related cctests.
BUG=v8:4372
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1469383004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32307}
The first bug was that there are two different "initialization positions"
passed into PatternRewriter::DeclareAndInitializeVariables, and we weren't
setting them all properly for this case.
After further code review, it became clear that we weren't even recording
the correct position (the end of the initializer expression).
The combination of those two bugs caused the hole check elimination code
in full-codegen to skip emitting a hole check.
This patch takes care of both of those things. A follow-up will try
to reduce the number of "initializer positions" we track in the
variable declaration code.
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4568
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1468143004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32237}
For web compat reasons, we support an initializer in the declaration
part of a for-in loop. But we should disallow this for destructured
declarations (just as we do for lexical declarations). In fact, without
disallowing it, we crash.
Also fix up the PreParser to have the same restrictions here as the parser
(the lexical check was missing there), verified by running the message tests
with --min-preparse-length=0.
In fixing the logic I've also cleaned up the code a bit, removing the
only-called-once DeclarationParsingResult::SingleName method.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1471973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32236}
This is in preparation for the addition of --harmony-destructuring-assignment.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1450193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32098}
Reason for revert:
MSAN errors on arm64: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20MSAN/builds/5123/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Implement destructuring binding in try/catch
>
> The approach is to desugar
>
> try { ... }
> catch ({x, y}) { ... }
>
> into
>
> try { ... }
> catch (.catch) {
> let x = .catch.x;
> let y = .catch.y;
> ...
> }
>
> using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
> of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
> made inside the catch block.
>
> No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
> us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
> in the spec.
>
> There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
> support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
> good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
> block this moving forward.
>
> BUG=v8:811
> LOG=y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a316db995e6e4253664920652ed4e5a38b2caeba
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:811
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1408063013
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31798}
The approach is to desugar
try { ... }
catch ({x, y}) { ... }
into
try { ... }
catch (.catch) {
let x = .catch.x;
let y = .catch.y;
...
}
using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
made inside the catch block.
No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
in the spec.
There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
block this moving forward.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1417483014
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
When the checker was added prohibiting lexical binding called let,
certain error propagation was not implemented properly. This patch
fixes that issue, which fixes error checking for cases such as
let [let]
BUG=v8:4403
R=adamk
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1409613003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31289}
An identifier may be parsed in an object literal like {let}, but
this was previously left out of lexical name checking. This patch
adds that check to prohibit code like
let {let} = {let: 1}
BUG=v8:4403
LOG=N
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1401253003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31278}
This patch prohibits lexical bindings from being called 'let', even in
sloppy mode, following the ES2015 specification. The change affects
multiple cases of lexical bindings, including simple let/const declarations
and both kinds of for loops. var and legacy const bindings still permit
the name to be let, including in destructuring cases. Tests are added to
verify, though some cases are commented out since they led to (pre-existing)
crashes.
BUG=v8:4403
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371263003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31115}
