This CL implements i8x16.extract_lane_u, i16x8.extract_lane_u operations by
changing the default narrow extract operations to be unsigned. The
sign-extended extracts are implemented on top of the unsigned extracts
with an additional extend compiler node.
For IA32/X64, the codegen effectively remains the same -
0x389332bc32a3 63 660f3a14c900 pextrb rcx,xmm1,0
0x389332bc32a9 69 0fbec9 movsxbl rcx,rcx
0x389332bc32a3 63 660f3a14c900 pextrb rcx,xmm1,0
0x389332bc32a9 69 0fbec9 movsxbl rcx,rcx
On ARM, this adds an additional sxt instruction for the signed extracts.
Bug: v8:8460
Change-Id: I67f14b2b860ff8cc86ffbb2f65c7ef7de32da83f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846711
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64172}
This brings our constants back in line with the changed spec text. We
already use kExprTableGet and kExprTableSet, but for locals and globals
we still use the old wording.
This renaming is mostly mechanical.
PS1 was created using:
ag -l 'kExpr(Get|Set)Global' src test | \
xargs -L1 sed -E 's/kExpr(Get|Set)Global\b/kExprGlobal\1/g' -i
PS2 contains manual fixes.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9810
Change-Id: I064a6448cd95bc24d31a5931b5b4ef2464ea88b1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1847355
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64163}
FMA operations is always supported on arm64, so in the test, we expect
fused results on arm64 whenever we run on TurboFan.
Bug: v8:9415
Change-Id: Ia2016533b9b76ee14b8c8da1c0d4ff7753276714
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1819723
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63973}
Add a new test SimdLoadStoreLoadMemargOffset to test this, without this fix
this test would have failed.
Bug: v8:9753
Change-Id: I119adda8e3c6c7adb0ad4023298bbce9c0c64a01
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1811457
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63914}
Quasi Fused Multiply-Add and Quasi Fused Multiply-Subtract performs, on floats, a + b * c and a - b * c respectively.
When there is only a single rounding, it is a fused operation. Quasi in this case means that the result can either be fused or not fused (two roundings), depending on hardware support.
It is tricky to write the test because we need to calculate the expected value, and there is no easy way to express fused or unfused operation in C++, i.e.
we cannot confirm that float expected = a + b * c will perform a fused or unfused operation (unless we use intrinsics).
Thus in the test we have a list of simple checks, plus interesting values that we know will produce different results depending on whether it was fused or not.
The difference between 32x4 and 64x2 qfma/qfms is the type, and also the values of b and c that will cause an overflow, and thus the intermediate rounding will affect the final result.
The same array can be copy pasted for both types, but with a bit of templating we can avoid that duplication.
Change-Id: I0973a3d28468d25f310b593c72f21bff54d809a7
Bug: v8:9415
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1779325
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63878}
Drive by fix of type of expected value in a test
Bug: v8:9626
Change-Id: I1bb44082b873383ea75e7089828bc68c9d4e0df0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1757503
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63727}
Implementations for other architectures will follow in subsequent
changes.
Bug: v8:8460
Change-Id: I279388ab76b1d88d65cbe179088be5573c17fc58
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1796317
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63693}
Implement I64x2 multiply using 32-bit multiplies.
This approach uses two fewer cycles (0.88x) on Cortex-A53 and three fewer cycles (0.86x)
on Cortex-A72, compared to moving to general purpose registers and doing two 64-bit multiplies.
Based on a patch by Zhi An Ng.
Bug: v8:8460
Change-Id: I9c8d3bb77f0d751eec2d85823522558b7f173628
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781696
Commit-Queue: Martyn Capewell <martyn.capewell@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63558}
This is only for turbofan and interpreter, and simd lowering for 64x2 is
not implemented yet.
Bug: v8:8460
Change-Id: I0d046cb39ff64936da772e0db9a86b88b1509ac2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1769194
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63466}
This off-by-1 error surfaces when the load/store opcodes take up 2
bytes, which is the case for v128.load and v128.store SIMD operations.
Bug: v8:9015
Change-Id: Ife17375ed3450a95399b326bc6415dbc3ed3773b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1769480
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63405}
- Move undef closer to end of usage
- Move I64x2ExtractWithF64x2 closer to Extract tests, and into ifdef
scope so it runs on arm64 builds
Change-Id: I7138c44097975d02e97f4b2b9bfcddd8eb9735c8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1754544
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63227}
This is a reland of
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1749712 with a fix in
test-run-wasm-simd.cc to use base::Divide to work around C++ undefined
behavior when the denominator is 0.
Bug: v8:8460
Change-Id: Ia0a4ff621cccc6d9b7528717bf3fa7c79e42ba1a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1745819
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63198}
Also add a IsExtreme(double) overload.
This wasn't causing issues because there was no codepath
which exercised it (only approx operations did).
Change-Id: If7583fb567137c428d16c0d2cdfc37e086f7f3fd
Bug: v8:8460
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1726675
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63053}
The mask should cover the sign (1 bit), exponent (11 bits) and quiet bit (1 bit) of significand, total of 13 bits. The old mask only covered 9 bits.
Change-Id: I6ec402b4cec34978eac8fa3e5452ad22540a93ce
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1726984
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63015}
-0.0 and 0.0 compare equals, so a < b ? a : b for min would pick b
incorrectly. We need to use JS semantics here, which returns -0.0.
Bug: v8:8425
Change-Id: I8ab094b566ece9c586de86aad4594dfdf8da930b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724802
Reviewed-by: Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62969}
Change-Id: I99fe89a679e6a628bd6fa7600f756d9a35450243
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695203
Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62751}
