This is a reland of e55e0aa5bd
Original change's description:
> [runtime] Fix protector invalidation
>
> Protectors trigger when special properties are modified or masked. Previously
> we would check whether the property stored on the holder would invalidate the
> protector. Stores to to the receiver rather than the holder, however, so this
> CL changes holder for receiver, and adds additional checks that were missing.
>
> Bug: v8:9466
> Change-Id: I81bc3d73f91381da0d254e9eb79365ae2d25d998
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1708468
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62805}
Tbr: leszeks@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9466
Change-Id: I693c73577ca9a35a271f509770cc1c87e5cc4b73
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1709420
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62829}
This reverts commit e55e0aa5bd.
Reason for revert: speculative revert for tsan breakage
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/v8/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/8907588363297935904/+/steps/Check__flakes_/0/logs/regress-437713/0
Original change's description:
> [runtime] Fix protector invalidation
>
> Protectors trigger when special properties are modified or masked. Previously
> we would check whether the property stored on the holder would invalidate the
> protector. Stores to to the receiver rather than the holder, however, so this
> CL changes holder for receiver, and adds additional checks that were missing.
>
> Bug: v8:9466
> Change-Id: I81bc3d73f91381da0d254e9eb79365ae2d25d998
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1708468
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62805}
TBR=leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
Change-Id: Id8fc36525b7c5631589a67073ad1fd5815ea2775
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:9466
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1708482
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62807}
Protectors trigger when special properties are modified or masked. Previously
we would check whether the property stored on the holder would invalidate the
protector. Stores to to the receiver rather than the holder, however, so this
CL changes holder for receiver, and adds additional checks that were missing.
Bug: v8:9466
Change-Id: I81bc3d73f91381da0d254e9eb79365ae2d25d998
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1708468
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62805}
The MapIterator protector protects the original iteration behaviors of
Map.prototype.keys(), Map.prototype.values(), and Set.prototype.entries().
It does not protect the original iteration behavior of
Map.prototype[Symbol.iterator](). The protector is invalidated when:
* The 'next' property is set on an object where the property holder is the
%MapIteratorPrototype% (e.g. because the object is that very prototype).
* The 'Symbol.iterator' property is set on an object where the property
holder is the %IteratorPrototype%. Note that this also invalidates the
SetIterator protector (see below).
The SetIterator protector protects the original iteration behavior of
Set.prototype.keys(), Set.prototype.values(), Set.prototype.entries(),
and Set.prototype[Symbol.iterator](). The protector is invalidated when:
* The 'next' property is set on an object where the property holder is the
%SetIteratorPrototype% (e.g. because the object is that very prototype).
* The 'Symbol.iterator' property is set on an object where the property
holder is the %SetPrototype% OR %IteratorPrototype%. This means that
setting Symbol.iterator on a MapIterator object can also invalidate the
SetIterator protector, and vice versa, setting Symbol.iterator on a
SetIterator object can also invalidate the MapIterator. This is an over-
approximation for the sake of simplicity.
Bug: v8:7980
Change-Id: I54ad6e4c7f19ccc27d7001f6c4b6c8d6ea4ee871
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1273102
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56530}
