To be consistent with the all the other tiers and avoid confusion, we
rename --opt to ---turbofan, and --always-opt to --always-turbofan.
Change-Id: Ie23dc8282b3fb4cf2fbf73b6c3d5264de5d09718
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3610431
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80336}
stress_flush_bytecode controls stress flushing of both bytecode and
baseline code. So rename the flag to better reflect its functionality
Bug: v8:11947
Change-Id: Ie6c124a476c3a7c6eabd1d75de030ee15fe78e32
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3062567
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#76043}
This CL improves whitespace precision of coverage around try blocks;
previously a small portion of whitespace could be reported as uncovered
between try blocks and catch and/or finally blocks.
Change-Id: I763ae3d15106c88f2278cf8893c12b0869a62528
Fixed: v8:10030
Bug: v8:10030
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1962265
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65593}
In the presence of default arguments, the body of the function gets
wrapped into another block. This caused our trailing-range-after-return
optimization to not apply, because the wrapper block had no source
range assigned. This CL correctly assignes a source range to that block,
which allows already present code to handle it correctly.
Note that this is not a real coverage bug; we've just been reporting
whitespace as uncovered. We're fixing it for consistency.
Originally reported on github.com/bcoe/c8/issues/66
Bug: v8:9952
Change-Id: Iab3905f558eb99126e0dad8072d03d0a312fdcd3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1903430
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64836}
This fixes a bug where coverage for the inline script
<script>function foo() {}<script>
started to get deterministically reported as covered
after crrev.com/c/1771776, while before it, we most of
the time reported it as uncovered (depending on heap
order of SFIs). The correct result is to report `foo`
as uncovered as it is never called.
The problem arose from the fact that v8:9212 needed to
handle extra-wrappers around scripts correctly. Those
wrappers have the same source range as the wrapped
script and a call count of zero even if the wrapped
script is executed. To filter them out, we previously
determined nesting for identical source ranges by
ascending call count. However, in the script case above,
the script has call count one, while `foo` (which has
the same source range) has call count zero. In this
case, nesting is decreasing order of call counts.
This CL is a minimal change that sorts SFIs which are
top-level to the front, only then considers call counts
in descending order. This preserves the behavior that
node's extra wrappers are sorted to the front (and
then filtered out by existing logic), but also ensures
that for the example above, we report the script's
coverage before the coverage for `foo`.
Bug: v8:9857, v9:9212
Change-Id: Id224b0d8f12028b1f586ee5039e126bb5b8d8d36
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863197
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64307}
Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).
Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.
Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
Bug: v8:9705
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}
Async functions were not correctly fixed up for code coverage, which
caused an additional uncovered range to be reported between a return
statement and the closing bracket.
This CL adds code that detects such ranges, and removes them, similarly
to how the ranges are removed for normal functions. The removal process
is different, because the parser rewrites async functions to contain a
try-catch handling promise rejection.
Change-Id: I73b08d64be74d26c32f2f9652d027430d4671251
Bug: chromium:981313, v8:8381
Change-Id: I82a7f0c54d3a48609ef5255a7659d9557e163566
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1782837
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63561}
Prior to this CL, call counts at function scope were taken from the
FeedbackVector::invocation_count field. This had two major drawbacks:
1. for generator functions, these count the number of resumptions
instead of the number of calls; and 2. the invocation count is not
maintained in optimized code.
The solution implemented here is to add a dedicated call counter at
function scope which is incremented exactly once each time the
function is called.
A minor complication is that our coverage output format expects
function-scope counts in the dedicated CoverageFunction object, and
not as a CoverageBlock. Thus function-scope block counts are initially
marked with magic positions, and later recognized and rewritten during
processing.
This CL thus fixes reported generator function call counts and enables
optimizations in block coverage modes (more to come in a follow-up).
Drive-by: Don't report functions with empty source ranges.
Bug: v8:6000,v8:9148,v8:9212
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_layout_tests_layout_ng
Change-Id: Idbe5edb35a595cf12b6649314738ac00efd173b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1613996
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61574}
The SourceRangeAstVisitor has custom logic for blocks ending with a
statement that has a continuation range. In these cases, the trailing
continuation is removed which makes the reported coverage ranges a bit
nicer.
throw Error('foo') consists of an ExpressionStatement, with a
Throw expression stored within the statement. The source range itself
is stored with the Throw, not the statement.
We now properly extract the correct AST node for trailing throw
statements.
R=jgruber@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8691
Change-Id: Ibcbab79fbe54719a8993045040349c863b139011
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1480632
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59936}
Preserve coverage for unused functions by force marking them used when
code coverage is enabled.
Bug: chromium:927464
Change-Id: Ia973467d06f7268f4e98cc76d0bb98cc591e979c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1454717
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59373}
This changes a few bits about how continuation counters are handled.
It introduces a new mechanism that allows removal of a continuation
range after it has been created. If coverage is enabled, we run a first
post-processing pass on the AST immediately after parsing, which
removes problematic continuation ranges in two situations:
1. nested continuation counters - only the outermost stays alive.
2. trailing continuation counters within a block-like structure are
removed if the containing structure itself has a continuation.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8381, v8:8539
Change-Id: I6bcaea5060d8c481d7bae099f6db9f993cc30ee3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1339119
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58443}
Also disables --stress-flush-bytecode on some mjsunit tests which fail
when bytecode flushing is stressed due to test invariants.
Bug=v8:8395
Change-Id: If627910214b3c266e7776340ba182829148e8289
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1372071
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58230}
This replaces Runtime_RunMicrotasks with Runtime_PerformMicrotaskCheckpoint.
RunMicrotasks forcibly runs Microtasks even when the microtasks are suppressed,
and may causes nested Microtasks in a problematic way. E.g. that confuses
v8::MicrotasksScope::IsRunningMicrotasks() and GetEnteredOrMicrotaskContext().
OTOH, PerformMicrotaskCheckpoint() doesn't run cause the failure as it
respects the microtask suppressions.
As all existing tests don't call RunMicrotasks() in the suppressed situation
(like Promise.resolve().then(()=>{%RunMicrotasks();})), this change should
not affect to these tests.
Change-Id: Ib043a0cc8e482e022d375084d65ea98a6f54ef3d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1360095
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Taiju Tsuiki <tzik@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58068}
Block coverage is based on a system of ranges that can either have
both a start and end position, or only a start position (so-called
singleton ranges). When formatting coverage information, singletons
are expanded until the end of the immediate full parent range. E.g.
in:
{0, 10} // Full range.
{5, -1} // Singleton range.
the singleton range is expanded to {5, 10}.
Singletons are produced mostly for continuation counters that track
whether we execute past a specific language construct.
Unfortunately, continuation counters can turn up in spots that confuse
our post-processing. For example:
if (true) { ... block1 ... } else { ... block2 ... }
If block1 produces a continuation counter, it could end up with the
same start position as the else-branch counter. Since we merge
identical blocks, the else-branch could incorrectly end up with an
execution count of one.
We need to avoid merging such cases. A full range should always take
precedence over a singleton range; a singleton range should never
expand to completely fill a full range. An additional post-processing
pass ensures this.
Bug: v8:8237
Change-Id: Idb3ec7b2feddc0585313810b9c8be1e9f4ec64bf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1273095
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56531}
This reverts commit 471fef0469.
Reason for revert: A more general fix incoming at https://crrev.com/c/1273095.
Original change's description:
> [coverage] change block range to avoid ambiguity.
>
> By moving the block range end to left of closing bracket,
> we can avoid ambiguity where an open-ended singleton range
> could be both interpreted as inside the parent range, or
> next to it.
>
> R=verwaest@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:8237
> Change-Id: Ibc9412b31efe900b6d8bff0d8fa8c52ddfbf460a
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1254127
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56347}
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:8237
Change-Id: I39310cf3c2f06a0d98ff314740aaeefbfffc0834
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1273096
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56513}
By moving the block range end to left of closing bracket,
we can avoid ambiguity where an open-ended singleton range
could be both interpreted as inside the parent range, or
next to it.
R=verwaest@chromium.org
Bug: v8:8237
Change-Id: Ibc9412b31efe900b6d8bff0d8fa8c52ddfbf460a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1254127
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56347}
Before reporting coverage data, we attempt to reduce clutter by
merging nested and consecutive ranges. Nested ranges are merged, if
the child range has the same execution count as the parent range.
Sibling ranges are merged, if one sibling begins where the other ends
and execution counts are identical.
This allowed an invalid transformation in which a range with an
execution count of 1 would be merged into the parent change, but the
sibling range with identical start and end points and a count of 0
would remain, effectively deleting the covered range.
For example:
{start: 0, end: 10, count: 1},
{start: 5, end: 8, count: 1}, // It's invalid to remove this.
{start: 5, end: 8, count: 0}
The fix is to separate the parent and sibling merge passes, and
removing duplicate ranges in-between.
Bug: chromium:827530
Change-Id: Ic35eae1d4a106746570ce9cb412ed6710ef6da53
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/992114
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52352}
It was shipped in Chrome 63.
Bug: v8:5855
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Icc00b8300622d1c7b5662be8ac5e425b9781f666
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/858381
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50558}
This is a reland of 4d3bc552b5
Original change's description:
> [coverage] add coverage for binary expressions
>
> Adds block-level coverage tracking for binary && and ||
> expressions. Introduces a BinaryOperation source-range
> for tracking the operations themselves and an Expression
> source-range, used for tracking NaryLogical expressions.
>
> This builds on work by jgruber@chromium.org in
> the issue.
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org
> R=jgruber@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:6660
> Change-Id: I83a81f13a3514a734c06948b2d3e91138fb00e18
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/754564
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49304}
Bug: v8:6660
Change-Id: I1c8571660d6c501d526886867bd841c49d5c44fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/778288
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49613}
When collecting source ranges for conditionals (`a ? b : c`), include
the '?' and ':' tokens in the then- and else ranges, respectively.
Bug: v8:7098
Change-Id: I22315e2040c96c977e0b49e1fafe4228a6558471
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/778321
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49484}
This reverts commit 4d3bc552b5.
Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/785778
Original change's description:
> [coverage] add coverage for binary expressions
>
> Adds block-level coverage tracking for binary && and ||
> expressions. Introduces a BinaryOperation source-range
> for tracking the operations themselves and an Expression
> source-range, used for tracking NaryLogical expressions.
>
> This builds on work by jgruber@chromium.org in
> the issue.
>
> TBR=marja@chromium.org
> R=jgruber@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:6660
> Change-Id: I83a81f13a3514a734c06948b2d3e91138fb00e18
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/754564
> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49304}
TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,ben@npmjs.com
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: v8:6660
Change-Id: Ie017c528604b2e01400f527511413eaea5786198
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/776768
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49454}
Adds block-level coverage tracking for binary && and ||
expressions. Introduces a BinaryOperation source-range
for tracking the operations themselves and an Expression
source-range, used for tracking NaryLogical expressions.
This builds on work by jgruber@chromium.org in
the issue.
TBR=marja@chromium.orgR=jgruber@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org
Bug: v8:6660
Change-Id: I83a81f13a3514a734c06948b2d3e91138fb00e18
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/754564
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49304}
This is in preparation to the removal of the FullCodeGenerator, we no
longer need the ability to stress the underlying implementation.
R=rmcilroy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:6409
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.v8:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Iad3177d6de4a68b57c12a770b6e85ed7a9710254
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/584747
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47276}
Consider:
function f() {
return;
}
This CL ensures that the closing brace is considered as covered by
introducing a special case for open-ended range rewrites when the
parent range is the function range itself.
Bug: v8:6000, v8:6661
Change-Id: I0be307759967e9f4df245a4f367326a37dda86fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/597651
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47079}
This includes the catch and finally keywords in the respective range.
For instance:
// Catch range previously: |<--------->|
try { /* ... */ } catch (e) { /* ... */ }
// Now: |<------------------->|
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I1bd9f7fce8bb7de945da83ab512833841b9d956a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/586598
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46959}
These counters handle cases in which the catch/finally block contains a jump
statement.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: Ic83f11ee431edabe61f129c9abc3adc12a79c338
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/586595
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46945}
The yield* statement when used in combination with async iterators is not
supported yet, as that is desugared into a more complex construct that doesn't
offer a good dedicated bytecode to attach the source range information yet.
Note that invocation counts of generator functions are incorrect as they count
each resumption as an individual call. See https://crbug.com/v8/6594.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I7ac7073473c9b64bb207cdbc4dab083ec1145656
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/582690
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46890}
Refactor common test code into code-coverage-utils.js and add tests to
verify counter behavior in opt/no-opt situations.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I07e62345476e8c81521c491ae605ddaf71600667
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/584449
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46888}
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I8c068383300ba869a87f836504c84ea08fcff87e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/568307
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46675}
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: Ia50108ebbf838e210d95cb268858394e6a66c88d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/567990
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46658}
Removes the --ignition flag which is now on by default. Adds a
--stress-fullcodegen flag which enables running all functions supported
by fullcodegen to be compiled by fullcodegen.
This will enable moving parser internalization later when we are not
stressing fullcodegen or compiling asm.js functions.
BUG=v8:5203, v8:6409, v8:6589
Change-Id: I7fa68016d4e734755434ec0b4e749ef65ffa7f4e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/565569
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46635}
This CL moves collected source range information out of AST nodes
and into a side table stored on ParseInfo. The side table is only
created if block coverage is enabled, so there's almost no memory
overhead in the standard case.
Change-Id: I41871b8425ebbc6217d82d3ad26b5fc9e5d68ecb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/566808
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46590}
Switch statements generate a counter for each clause plus a continuation
counter.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: Ic55a7efda54de1152bd5283d753119aa2764afbd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558249
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46550}
This adds support for exception control flow by adding a counter behind throw
statements (never incremented), as well as a counter for catch and finally
blocks.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I3959772c889b543ab5e186ad7cd710e55a8aec23
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558993
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46476}
This CL adds a few transformations that clean up the set of reported
source ranges. Duplicates, empty, and uncovered ranges are removed, and
nested/consecutive ranges are merged if possible.
BUG=v8:6000
Change-Id: I421ee35ce8292cfe84c1eea4f653762cea5d909d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558411
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46450}
This CL improves reported source range precision in a couple of ways:
Source ranges are now standardized to consist of an inclusive start
index and an exclusive end index (similar to what's reported for
functions). For example:
0123456789 // Offset.
{ f(); } // Block represented as range {0,8}.
Duplicate singleton ranges (i.e. same start and end offsets) are now
merged (this only becomes relevant once jump statement coverage is
added). For example:
for (.) break; // Break- and loop continuation have same positions.
SourceRangeScope incorrectly collected starting position
(unconditionally) and end position (when no semi-colon was present).
01234567890123 // Offset.
for (.) break // Loop body range is {8,13}, was {6,9}.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I62e7c70cc894a20f318330a2fbbcedc47da2b5db
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/541358
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46095}
Track execution counts of the continuations of block structures (e.g.
IfStatements) to capture cases in which execution does not continue after a
block. For example:
for (;;) {
return;
}
// Never reached, tracked by continuation counter.
A continuation counter only has a start position; it's range is implicitly
until the next sibling range or the end of the parent range.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I8e8f1f5b140b64c86754b916e626eb50f0707d70
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/530846
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46006}
This adds block coverage support for simple iteration. For-of and
for-in loops are not yet covered, and we don't yet keep execution counts
for init, cond, and next statements.
BUG=v8:6000
Change-Id: I30b468a2c93f0bb60e857b6632be92920f6857e0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/527113
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45779}
This CL implements general infrastructure for block coverage together with
initial support for if-statements.
Coverage output can be generated in lcov format by d8 as follows:
$ d8 --block-coverage --lcov=$(echo ~/simple-if.lcov) ~/simple-if.js
$ genhtml ~/simple-if.lcov -o ~/simple-if
$ chrome ~/simple-if/index.html
A high level overview of the implementation follows:
The parser now collects source ranges unconditionally for relevant AST nodes.
Memory overhead is very low and this seemed like the cleanest and simplest
alternative.
Bytecode generation uses these ranges to allocate coverage slots and insert
IncBlockCounter instructions (e.g. at the beginning of then- and else blocks
for if-statements). The slot-range mapping is generated here and passed on
through CompilationInfo, and is later accessible through the
SharedFunctionInfo.
The IncBlockCounter bytecode fetches the slot-range mapping (called
CoverageInfo) from the shared function info and simply increments the counter.
We don't collect native-context-specific counts as they are irrelevant to our
use-cases.
Coverage information is finally generated on-demand through Coverage::Collect.
The only current consumer is a d8 front-end with lcov-style output, but the
short-term goal is to expose this through the inspector protocol.
BUG=v8:6000
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2882973002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45737}
