Tick event processor should not stay in a tight loop
when there's nothing to do. It can go sleep until next sample event.
LOG=N
BUG=v8:3967
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1118533003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28211}
Add a finalize incremental marking mode for CollectAllGarbage to finalize incremental marking when incremental marking is in progress, but we want a full gc at a given CollectAllGarbage call site.
Default mode for CollectAllGarbage is finalize incremental marking and perform a full GC.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1082973003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27831}
it is the last patch of https://codereview.chromium.org/1012633002
All that we need here is to push the collected info to the profiler
and convert it into actionable information about deopt.
On the Next: get the info accessible by embedder.
BUG=chromium:452067
LOG=n
TEST=DeoptAtFirstLevelInlinedSource, DeoptAtSecondLevelInlinedSource, DeoptUntrackedFunction
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1013143003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27403}
We use slightly different schema for JumpTable on arm64 than for x64.
We do a branch (B) to the JumpTable from the code,
then a branch (B) to the end of jump table code
and then branch to the deoptimizer code with putting
the return address into lr register (Call which is actually Blr).
As a result the 'from' address in Deoptimizer always points to
the end of JumpTable code and we can get nothing from this information.
0) I moved save_doubles and needs_frame code out of for_loop.
1) I replaced B commands with Bl so we put different return addresses
to lr register for the different jump table entries and replaced
the final Call with Br which do not touch lr register.
Also I removed the last_entry check so we will always do the Bl
even for the last entry because we need the right address in lr.
I don't think that this will affect the performance because it
just one more branch for entire deopt mechanics.
BUG=chromium:452067
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/984893003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27094}
The original code always returned the first entry from RelocInfo that matched with
bailout_id. But we may have a few different deopt reasons for one bailout_id.
So we need to get the one which matches with a particular call from JumpTable.
We can do this by checking not 'target_address' (it maps to bailout_id)
but 'from' address which maps to a particular JumpTable entry.
The test was reworked so it tests identical functions against different reasons.
BUG=chromium:452067
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/984773003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27076}
Reason for revert:
Some tests still flaky
Original issue's description:
> CpuProfiler: enable tests except four failing tests.
>
> Four tests are failing due to a problem with no frame ranges.
>
> BUG=
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2be160e726f2be6272b77e53fbd556aded6024f1
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27035}
TBR=yurys@chromium.org,svenpanne@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/987553005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27037}
Four tests are failing due to a problem with no frame ranges.
BUG=
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/976203003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27035}
The root of problem is the fact that we don't track the position of 'this' statement but use them when visit compare statement.
As a result we have -1 as the position of left expression and the resulting relative position is negative and doesn't fit into BitField.
BUG=452067
TEST=test-cpu-profiler/SourceLocation
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/940593002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26741}
1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
for the each deopt case.
2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.
Sample profile dump.
[Top down]:
0 (root) 0 #1
1 29 #2
1 test 29 #3
2 opt_function 29 #4
2 opt_function 29 #5
deopted at 118 with reason 'not a heap number'
deopted at 137 with reason 'division by zero'
BUG=452067
LOG=n
Committed: https://crrev.com/ce8701b247d3c6604f24f17a90c02d17b4417f54
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/919953002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26630}
Reason for revert:
static initializers broke the build
Original issue's description:
> CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode.
>
> 1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
> was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
> for the each deopt case.
>
> 2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
> When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
> On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.
>
> Sample profile dump.
> [Top down]:
> 0 (root) 0 #1
> 1 29 #2
> 5 test 29 #3
> 3 opt_function 29 #4
> deopted at 52 with reason 'not a heap number'
> deopted at 71 with reason 'division by zero'
>
> BUG=452067
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/ce8701b247d3c6604f24f17a90c02d17b4417f54
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}
TBR=jarin@chromium.org,svenpanne@chromium.org,yurys@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=452067
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/915173005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26616}
1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
for the each deopt case.
2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.
Sample profile dump.
[Top down]:
0 (root) 0 #1
1 29 #2
5 test 29 #3
3 opt_function 29 #4
deopted at 52 with reason 'not a heap number'
deopted at 71 with reason 'division by zero'
BUG=452067
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/919953002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}
1) Deoptimizer::Reason was replaced with Deoptimizer::DeoptInfo
because it also has raw position. Also the old name clashes with DeoptReason enum.
2) c_entry_fp assignment call was added to EntryGenerator::Generate
So we can calculate sp and have a chance to record the stack for the deopting function.
btw it makes the test stable.
3) new kind of CodeEvents was added to cpu-profiler
4) GetDeoptInfo method was extracted from PrintDeoptLocation.
So it could be reused in cpu profiler.
BUG=452067
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/910773002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26545}
During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.
This patch:
1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
(2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).
2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.
3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.
4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.
Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>;
R=svenpanne@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/682143003
Patch from Weiliang <weiliang.lin@intel.com>.
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25182}
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@25182 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Reason for revert:
It broke layout test fast/events/window-onerror-02.html, error column reported by window.onerror is now wrong (I believe it is because of the change in full-codegen):
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064%20%28dbg%29/builds/652
Original issue's description:
> Extend CPU profiler with mapping ticks to source lines
>
> The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info" instead of consumption the CodeLinePosition events emitted by the V8 compilers.
> During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
> When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
> Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
> correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.
>
> This patch:
> 1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
> The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
> (2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
> I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).
>
> 2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
> If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.
>
> 3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
> Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.
>
> 4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
> It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.
>
> Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>
> BUG=None
> LOG=Y
> R=svenpanne@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=24389TBR=svenpanne@chromium.org,danno@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org,denis.pravdin@intel.com,weiliang.lin@intel.com
BUG=None
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/624443005
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24394 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info" instead of consumption the CodeLinePosition events emitted by the V8 compilers.
During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.
This patch:
1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
(2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).
2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.
3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.
4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.
Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>
BUG=None
LOG=Y
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/616963005
Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24389 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The reuse of CodeCreateEvent for deopt events caused a CodeCreateEvent
fired twice for a code object. When the event was processed for the first
time it seized the no-fp-ranges from code object, so the second event
had no ranges info leaving code entry without them.
As a result when a cpu profile sample falls into the region it missed the
2nd stack frame.
LOG=N
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/290093005
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21418 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
- Distinguish between context bound scripts (Script) and context unbound scripts
(UnboundScript).
- Add ScriptCompiler (which will later contain functions for async compilation).
This is a breaking change, in particular, Script::New no longer exists (it is
replaced by ScriptCompiler::CompileUnbound). Script::Compile remains as a
backwards-compatible shorthand for ScriptCompiler::Compile.
Passing CompilerOptions with produce_data_to_cache = true doesn't do anything
yet; the only way to generate the data to cache is the old preparsing API. (To
be fixed in the next version.)
This is a fixed version of https://codereview.chromium.org/186723005/
BUG=
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/199063003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19925 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
- Distinguish between context bound scripts (Script) and context unbound scripts
(UnboundScript).
- Add ScriptCompiler (which will later contain functions for async compilation).
This is a breaking change, in particular, Script::New no longer exists (it is
replaced by ScriptCompiler::CompileUnbound). Script::Compile remains as a
backwards-compatible shorthand for ScriptCompiler::Compile.
Passing CompilerOptions with produce_data_to_cache = true doesn't do anything
yet; the only way to generate the data to cache is the old preparsing API. (To
be fixed in the next version.)
BUG=
R=dcarney@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/186723005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@19881 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
