Unfortunately, different runtime libraries and/or compilers differ on
whether a class without any copy constructor, move constructor, copy
assignment and move assignment operator is considered trivially
copyable.
See discussion on https://crrev.com/c/941521.
This CL adds a comment about this, and deletes a test for this specific
case.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.orgCC=jyan@ca.ibm.com, ivica.bogosavljevic@mips.com
Change-Id: Ie07adda370e5e955b782e72356b50121477d4623
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/944081
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51704}
MSVC 2015 and 2017 implement std::is_trivially_copyable, but not
correctly. Hence, reimplement it using more low-level primitives.
For stdlibc++ versions below 5.0, we already have a workaround for the
missing support of std::is_trivially_copyable, but this is an unsound
approximation, because it is ignoring move constructor, move assignment
and copy assignment. Therefore, do not use this approximation for
asserting trivial copyability of a type.
Finally, add unittests for the new is_trivially_copyable
implementations.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.orgCC=loorongjie@gmail.com
Change-Id: I9ee56a65882e8c94b72c9a2d484edd27963a5d89
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/941521
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51651}
