This patch refactors the parser and preparser interface to be more
readable and type-safe. It has no behavior changes.
Previously, parsers and preparsers were configured via bitfield called
parser_flags in the Parser constructor, and flags in
PreParser::PreParseProgram, ParserApi::Parse, and ParserApi::PreParse.
This was error-prone in practice: six call sites passed incorrectly
typed values to this interface (a boolean FLAG value, a boolean false
and a boolean true value). None of these errors were caught by the
compiler because it's just an "int".
The parser flags interface was also awkward because it encoded a
language mode, but the language mode was only used to turn on harmony
scoping or not -- it wasn't used to actually set the parser's language
mode.
Fundamentally these errors came in because of the desire for a
procedural parser interface, in ParserApi. Because we need to be able
to configure the parser in various ways, the flags argument got added;
but no one understood how to use the flags properly. Also they were
only used by constructors: callers packed bits, and the constructors
unpacked them into booleans on the parser or preparser.
The solution is to allow parser construction, configuration, and
invocation to be separated. This patch does that.
It passes the existing tests.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13450007
Patch from Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14151 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
* src/api.cc (ScriptData::PreCompile): Fix bogus use of bogus value for
preparsing flags by removing those arguments, which were always zero.
* src/parser.h
* src/parser.cc (ParserApi::PreParse): Remove extension and flags
arguments, both of which were either always 0 or incorrectly used.
* test/cctest/test-parsing.cc (RegressChromium62639, Regress928): Fix
more bogus uses of preparser api.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/13496008
Patch from Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@14140 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
I tried to limit the use of v8::Isolate::GetCurrent() and v8::internal::Isolate::Current() as much as possible, but sometimes this would have involved restructuring tests quite a bit, which is better left for a separate CL.
BUG=v8:2487
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/12716010
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@13953 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
in preparation of the introduction of ES6 'symbols' (aka private/unique names).
The SymbolTable became the StringTable. I also made sure to adapt all comments. The only remaining use of the term "symbol" (other than unrelated uses in the parser and such) is now 'NewSymbol' in the API and the 'V8.KeyedLoadGenericSymbol' counter, changing which might break embedders.
The one functional change in this CL is that I removed the former 'empty_string' constant, since it is redundant given the 'empty_symbol' constant that we also had (and both were used inconsistently).
R=yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/12210083
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@13781 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The CompilationInfo record now saves a Zone, and the compiler pipeline
allocates memory from the Zone in the CompilationInfo. Before
compiling a function, we create a Zone on the stack and save a pointer
to that Zone to the CompilationInfo; which then gets picked up and
allocated from.
BUG=
TEST=
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10534139
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@11877 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This CL fixes the preparser to have the same liberal automatic semicolon
insertion behaviour as the parser. In the case of a return statement in
global code we throw a syntax error at runtime rather than an early error
due to compatibility with KJS. However that hack allowed the following
syntactically incorrect program in global code in the parser but not in
the preparser:
if (false) return else {}
while the slightly saner version with the obligatory semicolon
if (false) return; else {}
was disallowed in the parser, but the preparser allowed it. This CL also
fixes that issue.
BUG=v8:1856
TEST=cctest/test-parsing.cc
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8844002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10201 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
source code positions it gets from the program counter to recreate the scope
chain by reparsing the function or program.
This CL includes the following changes
* Adds source code positions for the assignment added by the rewriter.
* Run the preparser over global code first.
* Use the ScopeType from the ScopeInfo to determine if the code being debugged
is eval, function or global code instead of looking up the '.result' symbol.
TEST=mjsunit/debug-stepout-scope.js
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8590027
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10076 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
So far the parser had its own harmony flag to disable the harmony scoping
feature when parsing native functions. With the introduction of the extended
language mode this becomes unnecessary because native functions will never enter
the extended mode. The parser can thus track FLAG_harmony_scoping and the
language mode of the current scope to see if harmony features are allowed. The
scanner and preparser have to keep their flag, because they can't use
FLAG_harmony_scoping as it is not available for the preparser-process
executable.
This depends on:
http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035/
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8562002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10063 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This CL introduces a third mode next to the non-strict
(henceforth called 'classic mode') and 'strict mode'
which is called 'extended mode' as in the current
ES.next specification drafts. The extended mode is based on
the 'strict mode' and adds new functionality to it. This
means that most of the semantics of these two modes
coincide.
The 'extended mode' is entered instead of the 'strict mode'
during parsing when using the 'strict mode' directive
"use strict" and when the the harmony-scoping flag is
active. This should be changed once it is fully specified how the 'extended mode' is entered.
This change introduces a new 3 valued enum LanguageMode
(see globals.h) corresponding to the modes which is mostly
used by the frontend code. This includes the following
components:
* (Pre)Parser
* Compiler
* SharedFunctionInfo, Scope and ScopeInfo
* runtime functions: StoreContextSlot,
ResolvePossiblyDirectEval, InitializeVarGlobal,
DeclareGlobals
The old enum StrictModeFlag is still used in the backend
when the distinction between the 'strict mode' and the 'extended mode' does not matter. This includes:
* SetProperty runtime function, Delete builtin
* StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC
* StubCache
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10062 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
So far free variables references in eval code are not statically
resolved. For example in
function foo() { var x = 1; eval("y = x"); }
the variable x will get mode DYNAMIC and y will get mode DYNAMIC_GLOBAL,
i.e. free variable references trigger dynamic lookups with a fast case
handling for global variables.
The CL introduces static resolution of free variables references in eval
code. If possible variable references are resolved to bindings belonging to
outer scopes of the eval call site.
This is achieved by deserializing the outer scope chain using
Scope::DeserializeScopeChain prior to parsing the eval code similar to lazy
parsing of functions. The existing code for variable resolution is used,
however resolution starts at the first outer unresolved scope instead of
always starting at the root of the scope tree.
This is a prerequisite for statically checking validity of assignments in
the extended code as specified by the current ES.next draft which will be
introduced by a subsequent CL. More specifically section 11.13 of revision 4
of the ES.next draft reads:
* It is a Syntax Error if the AssignmentExpression is contained in extended
code and the LeftHandSideExpression is an Identifier that does not
statically resolve to a declarative environment record binding or if the
resolved binding is an immutable binding.
TEST=existing tests in mjsunit
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8508052
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9999 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This also includes the two fixes from r9674 and r9675. Here's the diff
to the previous CL.
--- a/src/runtime.cc
+++ b/src/runtime.cc
@@ -11133,17 +11133,26 @@ class ScopeIterator {
context_(Context::cast(frame->context())),
nested_scope_chain_(4) {
+ // Catch the case when the debugger stops in an internal function.
+ Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared_info(function_->shared());
+ if (shared_info->script() == isolate->heap()->undefined_value()) {
+ if (shared_info->scope_info()->HasContext()) Next();
+ return;
+ }
+
// Check whether we are in global code or function code. If there is a stack
// slot for .result then this function has been created for evaluating
// global code and it is not a real function.
// Checking for the existence of .result seems fragile, but the scope info
// saved with the code object does not otherwise have that information.
- int index = function_->shared()->scope_info()->
+ int index = shared_info->scope_info()->
StackSlotIndex(isolate_->heap()->result_symbol());
// Reparse the code and analyze the scopes.
ZoneScope zone_scope(isolate, DELETE_ON_EXIT);
- Handle<SharedFunctionInfo> shared_info(function_->shared());
Handle<Script> script(Script::cast(shared_info->script()));
Scope* scope;
if (index >= 0) {
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8344046
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9734 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Previously the preparser always accepted natives syntax and let the
real parser throw the syntax error. In ES5, it should be an early error,
so the preparser must catch the error.
The perparser library does not expose parsing for natives syntax, it's
only used internally.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8306024
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9660 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
A multi-line comment containing a newline is considered a line-terminator for
other purposes, but a "-->" following such a comment is considered as being
on the same line as the text preceeding the multi-line comment.
This behavior matches JSC matching Firefox.
TEST=cctest/test-parsing/ScanHTMLEndComments
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7218009
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8351 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
We now only recognize "native function" when it occurs in extension scripts
(parsing with a non-NULL extension), and only if there is no line-terminator
between "native" and "function" (so that it would otherwise be a Syntax Error).
Preparsing never recognizes native functions, which is acceptable since we
never preparse extension scripts (because we don't allow lazy functions
anyway).
BUG=v8:1097
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7206020
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@8326 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
