The issue is caused when deoptimizing to an internal AST ID in a
postfix increment or decrement operation on variable. This could
happen for a global variable. In that case, the optimized code was
not properly simulating an extra stack slot in the unoptimized code to
hold the original value.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/5871002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@6025 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This fixes V8 issue 989.
Before, assignments used the AST ID of the assignment expression to
mark the side effect of the store, which became a target for
deoptimization bailout for code after the assignment. In effect
contexts this environment included the value of the assignment, which
was unexpected by the unoptimized code.
Now we introduce a new assignment ID for AST node types that include
an assignment (Assignment, CountOperation, and ForInStatement) and use
it for the side effect of the store.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/5682010
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@5990 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
When falling off the end of a function inlined in a test context, we cannot
constant fold the test of undefined away. The graph builder assumes that
control flow always reaches both branches of a test.
Instead, explicitly test and branch on "undefined". Introduce a pair of
empty blocks to hold the necessary LeaveInlined instructions.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/5566005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@5927 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
