This is a pre-work for allocating feedback vectors lazily. Feedback cells
are required to share the feedback vectors across the different closures
of the same function. Currently, they are held in the CreateClosureSlot
in the feedback vector. With lazy feedback vector allocation, we may not
have a feedback vector. However, we still need a place to store the
feedback cells, so if feedback vector is allocated in future it can still
be shared across closures.
Here is the detailed design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m2PTNChrlJqw9MiwK_xEJfqbFHAgEHmgGqmIN49PaBY/edit
BUG=v8:8394
Change-Id: Ib406d862b2809b1293bfecdcfcf8dea3127cb1c7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1503753
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#60147}
There are likely cleanups that can be done after this CL:
- context-related functions in the interpreter and compiler take ScopeInfo as
well as ScopeType and slot-count as input. The latter 2 should be directly
derived from the former. We should be able to drop FunctionContextParameters.
- ContextExtension is probably not needed anymore, since we now always have the
correct scope_info directly in the SCOPE_INFO_INDEX slot.
Bug: v8:7066
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_chromium_rel_ng;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: Ie1f6134c686a9f2183e54730d9cdd598a9e5ab67
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785151
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52952}
There are various situations where we explicitly compare a SMI against
another SMI (e.g., BuildIndexedJump). This is also a common pattern for
generated code (e.g., comparing a loop variable with an integer). Instead
of using the generic equality/strict-equality stub for this, which is
expensive, this CL offers a simple comparison stub, repurposing the
TestEqualStrictNoFeedback bytecode to TestReferenceEqual
Bug: v8:5310
Change-Id: Ib2b47cd24d5386cf0d20d3bd794776dc6e3a02a5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1007542
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Christian O. Andersson <cricke@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52655}
This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/65
and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-static-class-features/ by
splitting out instance and static field declarations into separate
flags for the separate proposals. Instance class fields is currently
at Stage 3 whereas static class fields is currently at Stage 2.
Bug: v8:5367
Change-Id: I133c945fd0b22dc5718c7bb61b10f22348087acd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/839778
Commit-Queue: Daniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50293}
