--no-stress-flush-bytecode doesn't exist and should be
--no-stress-flush-code. Not supressing it means a tester could pass
--stress-flush-code and --no-flush-bytecode, which are contradictory and
will assert.
Bug: v8:12331
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_numfuzz_dbg_ng,v8_numfuzz_ng
Change-Id: I6490271bcb11f5ea925eb8b65fbe0455c2dafeaf
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3233952
Reviewed-by: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77483}
And use it to remove the set of TurboProp test skips.
BUG=v8:9684,v8:12013
Change-Id: I878e2b9c595449c954735290959d3b38eead5a5b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3043963
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#75865}
Fuzzing found a problem with --turbo-optimize-apply when the
Array.prototype iterator is replaced with a generator function.
We can the issue by installing a protector on the array iterator.
This CL also defines the --turbo-optimize-apply as 'future' to get
more test coverage.
Bug: v8:9974
Change-Id: Id5bc68fde98ea5d1f6a951c4381ca6283b892632
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2966058
Commit-Queue: Paolo Severini <paolosev@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#75197}
