There are at least 3 mechanisms for detecting duplicate parameters.
- ExpressionClassifier
- Scope::DeclareParameter checking IsDeclaredParameter
- PatternRewriter::VisitVariableProxy failing to declare a duplicate parameter
The conditions for when duplicate parameters are allowed and when not are pretty
involved too. They are allowed when
- the function is not an arrow function and not a concise method *and*
- when the parameter list is simple *and*
- we're in sloppy mode (incl. the function doesn't declare itself strict).
In addition, we don't recognize some of the early errors, and it's
non-trivial to see which ones are recognized and which not (see bug
v8:6108). E.g., (dup, dup) => {}; is recognized but (dup, [dup]) => {} is
not. And (dup, [dup]) => 1; is.
We do have tests for some aspects of duplicate parameters (e.g., arrow function
duplicate parameters are included in arrow function tests), but it's hard to see
whether all combinations of the relevant conditions are tested.
This CL adds more structured tests which hopefully enables reducing the
duplicate parameter detection mechanisms to 2 or maybe even to 1.
BUG=v8:6092
Change-Id: Idd3db43b380aae4b9a89be5f1ed0755d39bfb36d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/456336
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vogelheim <vogelheim@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43895}
