As several pages can run in a single V8 instance, it is possible to
have functions from different security contexts intermixed in a single
CPU profile. To avoid exposing function names from one page to
another, filtering is introduced.
The basic idea is that instead of capturing return addresses from
stack, we're now capturing JSFunction addresses (as we anyway work
only with JS stack frames.) Each JSFunction can reach out for
context's security token. When providing a profile to a page, the
profile is filtered using the security token of caller page. Any
functions with different security tokens are filtered out (yes, we
only do fast path check for now) and their ticks are attributed to
their parents.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/2083005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4673 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The simple formula "ms = ticks * sampler_interval" doesn't work,
because e.g. on Linux, the actual sampling rate can be 5 times
lower than the one set up in the code. To calculate actual sampling
rate, current time is periodically queried and processed along with
actual sampling ticks count.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/1539038
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4427 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This is to make possible enabling usage of the new profiling subsystem
in Chromium without much hassle. The idea is pretty simple: unless the
new profiling API is used, all works as usual, as soon as Chromium
starts to use the new API, it will work too.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/1635005
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@4382 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
