Previously we threw a generic error meesage on failing hole check for
accessing 'this'. But 'this' can be a hole only if the super() has not
been called so we change the error message.
BUG=v8:5957
Change-Id: I2f0e3d813f16919645d8a5efa7d26e73bd2d83fe
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/459085
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44162}
Specifically, add bytecodes for Call0, Call1, Call2, CallProperty0, CallProperty1,
and CallProperty2. Also share the bytecode handler code between between
equivalent CallX and CallPropertyX handlers.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684993002
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43290}
Committed: 00d6f1f80a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684993002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43700}
Reason for revert:
Due to arm64 failures
Original issue's description:
> [interpreter] Create custom call opcodes for specific argument counts
>
> Specifically, add bytecodes for Call0, Call1, Call2, CallProperty0, CallProperty1,
> and CallProperty2. Also share the bytecode handler code between between
> equivalent CallX and CallPropertyX handlers.
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684993002
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43290}
> Committed: 00d6f1f80aTBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2709533002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43308}
Specifically, add bytecodes for Call0, Call1, Call2, CallProperty0, CallProperty1,
and CallProperty2. Also share the bytecode handler code between between
equivalent CallX and CallPropertyX handlers.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2684993002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43290}
Rename to Construct and ConstructWithSpread, to match the names of
the JSOperators used.
Unfortunately, I can't find a way for auto-formatting to stay happy unless we
change the indentation for the whole BYTECODE_LIST macro.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2663963003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42840}
Previously the message was "this is not defined" which is nonsensical.
BUG=v8:4407
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2614053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42114}
This is so that a NotSuperConstructor error is thrown before evaluating the
arguments to the super constructor. Besides updating the runtime function, a
new bytecode GetSuperConstructor is introduced.
BUG=v8:5336
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2504553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41788}
The Ldr[Named/Keyed]Property bytecodes are problematic for the deoptimizer when
inlining accessors in TurboFan. Remove them and replace with a Star lookahead
in the bytecode handlers for Lda[Named/Keyed]Property.
BUG=v8:4280
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2485383002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40860}
Consistently collect CallIC feedback in fullcodegen and Ignition, even
for possibly direct eval calls, that were treated specially so far, for
no apparent reason. With the upcoming SharedFunctionInfo based CallIC
feedback, we might be able to even inline certain direct eval calls, if
they manage to hit the eval cache. More importantly, this patch
simplifies the collection and dealing with CallIC feedback (and as a
side effect fixes an inconsistency with feedback for super constructor
calls).
R=mvstanton@chromium.org, mythria@chromium.org
BUG=v8:2206,v8:4280,v8:5267
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2426693002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40397}
In order to optimize super constructor calls with ES6 classes, we need
some feedback for both the JSCallConstruct and the resulting JSCreate
nodes in TurboFan. Both already optimize perfectly when the see nodes
with JSFunction constants, so utilizing the existing CallIC machinery
here, enables us to optimize the super constructor calls right now w/o
a lot of effort.
Note that there are probably better ways to track this information,
for example we could do some tracking on the constructor functions;
this will however require serious changes in TurboFan and the runtime,
and would block progress on more important tasks.
R=mythria@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5517
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2419423002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40337}
There are only a few occasions where we allocate a register in an outer
expression allocation scope, which makes the costly free-list approach
of the BytecodeRegisterAllocator unecessary. This CL replaces all
occurrences with moves to the accumulator and stores to a register
allocated in the correct scope. By doing this, we can simplify the
BytecodeRegisterAllocator to be a simple bump-pointer allocator
with registers released in the same order as allocated.
The following changes are also made:
- Make BytecodeRegisterOptimizer able to use registers which have been
unallocated, but not yet reused
- Remove RegisterExpressionResultScope and rename
AccumulatorExpressionResultScope to ValueExpressionResultScope
- Introduce RegisterList to represent consecutive register
allocations, and use this for operands to call bytecodes.
By avoiding the free-list handling, this gives another couple of
percent on CodeLoad.
BUG=v8:4280
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2369873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39905}
Add a notion of "invocation count" to the baseline compilers, which
increment a special slot in the TypeFeedbackVector for each invocation
of a given function (the optimized code doesn't currently collect this
information).
Use this invocation count to relativize the call counts on the call
sites within the function, so that the inlining heuristic has a view
of relative importance of a call site rather than some absolute numbers
with unclear meaning for the current function. Also apply the call site
frequency as a factor to all frequencies in the inlinee by passing this
to the graph builders so that the importance of a call site in an
inlinee is relative to the topmost optimized function.
Note that all functions that neither have literals nor need type
feedback slots will share a single invocation count cell in the
canonical empty type feedback vector, so their invocation count is
meaningless, but that doesn't matter since we only use the invocation
count to relativize call counts within the function, which we only have
if we have at least one type feedback vector (the CallIC slot).
See the design document for additional details on this change:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VoYBhpDhJC4VlqMXCKvae-8IGuheBGxy32EOgC2LnT8
BUG=v8:5267,v8:5372
R=mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2337123003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39410}
This fixes a corner-case where the bytecode was using the <new.target>
register directly without going through the local variable. The value
might be clobbered because the deoptimizer doesn't properly restore the
value. The label will causes bytecode pipeline to be flushed and hence
ensure {BytecodeRegisterOptimizer} doesn't reuse <new.target> anymore.
R=rmcilroy@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-645103
BUG=chromium:645103
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2325133002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39306}
For historical reasons, the interpreter's bytecode expectations tests
required a type for the constant pool. This had two disadvantages:
1. Strings and numbers were not visible in mixed pools, and
2. Mismatches of pool types (e.g. when rebaselining) would cause parser
errors
This removes the pool types, making everything 'mixed', but appending
the values to string and number valued constants. Specifying a pool type
in the *.golden header now prints a warning (for backwards compatibility).
BUG=v8:5350
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2310103002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39216}
Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
includes collection of allocation site feedback.
Reland of https://codereview.chromium.org/2190293003/ with a bug fix.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2225923003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39120}
Drive-by fix: the order of parameters in the BinaryOpWithFeedback TurboFan code stubs now reflects the convention of having the context at the end.
BUG=v8:5273
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2263253002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38832}
The old code was using VariableMode, but that signal is both
over-pessimistic (some CONST and LET variables need no hole-initialization)
and inconsistent with other uses of the InitializationFlag enum (such
as %LoadLookupSlot).
This changes no observable behavior, but removes unnecessary hole
initialization and hole checks in a few places, including
block-scoped function declarations, super property lookups,
and new.target.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, neis@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2201193004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38395}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Fails on nosnap debug:
https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20nosnap%20-%20debug/builds/8403
Original issue's description:
> [Interpreter] Collect type feedback for 'new' in the bytecode handler
>
> Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
> earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
> because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
> This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
> includes collection of allocation site feedback.
>
> BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/9d5e6129c4c7f9cbfe81a5fad2a470f219fe137c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38364}
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,balazs.kilvady@imgtec.com,mythria@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2212343002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38368}
Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
earlier cl (https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002/) was reverted
because that implementation did not collect allocation site feedback.
This regressed delta blue by an order of magnitude. This implementation
includes collection of allocation site feedback.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2190293003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38364}
Reason for revert:
This cl causes a large regression in octane (https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=629503). I have to investigate the reason before I can reland this.
Original issue's description:
> [Interpreter] Collect type feedback for 'new' in the bytecode handler
>
> Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
> current implementation does not collect allocation site feedback.
>
> BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
> LOG=N
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/1eadc76419b323fb2e55ae9953142f801704aa59
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37862}
TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2165633003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37872}
Collect type feedback in the bytecode handler for 'new' bytecode. The
current implementation does not collect allocation site feedback.
BUG=v8:4280, v8:4780
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2153433002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37862}
Introduces fused bytecodes for fusing LdaSmi followed by a binary op bytecode.
The chosen bytecodes are used frequently in Octane: AddSmi, SubSmi,
BitwiseOrSmi, BitwiseAndSmi, ShiftLeftSmi, ShiftRightSmi.
There are additional code stubs for these operations that are biased towards
both the left hand and right hand operands being Smis.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2111923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37531}
With this change the bytecode array builder only emits expression
positions for bytecodes that can throw. This allows more peephole
optimization opportunities and results in smaller code.
BUG=v8:4280,chromium:615979
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2038323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36863}
This change requires a single pass over the register set during
bytecode pipeline flushes.
A few bytecode tests are updated too because the order of register
flushes is different.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2033013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36726}
This change introduces five fused bytecodes for common bytecode
sequences on popular websites. These are LdrNamedProperty,
LdrKeyedProperty, LdrGlobal, LdrContextSlot, and LdrUndefined. These
load values into a destination register operand instead of the
accumulator. They are emitted by the peephole optimizer.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1985753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36507}
Prints source position information alongside bytecode.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1963663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36171}
This change introduces wide prefix bytecodes to support wide (16-bit)
and extra-wide (32-bit) operands. It retires the previous
wide-bytecodes and reduces the number of operand types.
Operands are now either scalable or fixed size. Scalable operands
increase in width when a bytecode is prefixed with wide or extra-wide.
The bytecode handler table is extended to 256*3 entries. The
first 256 entries are used for bytecodes with 8-bit operands,
the second 256 entries are used for bytecodes with operands that
scale to 16-bits, and the third group of 256 entries are used for
bytecodes with operands that scale to 32-bits.
LOG=N
BUG=v8:4747,v8:4280
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1783483002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34955}