Always unmark arrowhead parameters as assigned directly after their
initialization as the parser doesn't know when it first sees the
"assignment" that it may be in an arrowhead.
Bug: chromium:1003403, v8:8510
Change-Id: Iad5a4136d5ec06331fc43b81a809fd72cee2dd65
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1815131
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63947}
This introduces a limit for the interpreter's BacktrackStack to match
the limit used by generated code (RegExpStack::kMaximumStackSize).
Bug: chromium:1006670
Change-Id: I0b7613698e61257aecca89535ad9109c7e454692
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1821458
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63945}
This reduces the number of label indices accepted by {br_table} from the
full function body size to specifically 65520 labels. Note that TurboFan
already had a similar limitation on switches, but caused a crash during
compilation up until now. This change just makes the limit explicit and
avoids the crash during compilation.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-9759
BUG=v8:9759
Change-Id: I3a9a4406b19a7f98fc36707b3b946be846170a15
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1821457
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes [né Hammacher] <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63944}
This fixes how arguments of a call to {fround} are being parsed. It now
accepts a single "AssignmentExpression" only instead of an "Expression"
which could potentially be a whole comma-separated list of expressions.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-1006592
BUG=chromium:1006592
Change-Id: Ifaf0c2b048e4ec18429cc6039c0e7dcdecc1d0bb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1815255
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63926}
This loads the call builtin from the Isolate root instead of embedding
it into the instruction stream. This can be more efficient, but more
importantly it fixes an issue with tracing and eventually allows for
background compilation of these wrappers.
R=clemensh@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-crbug-1006631
BUG=chromium:1006631
Change-Id: Ife1bc513340d233a3c01789c7b56126fe3b87f6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1815245
Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63924}
Change Parser::AllowsLazyParsingWithoutUnresolvedVariables to return
false if it may be parsing an arrow function.
Bug: v8:9758, v8:8510
Change-Id: Ic5d213d4358ff954a169c03e449197c3f050880c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1816510
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63920}
Changes the Array(Includes|IndexOf)(Holey|Packed)Doubles builtins to
first check the input array is not empty before attempting to cast it to
a FixedDoubleArray as an empty array of doubles can be backed by a
FixedArray.
Bug: chromium:1004061
Change-Id: I12f302afa9596fb8a5581849662cd67fcc06f92b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1806676
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63794}
The current JSObject type is too specific as it can also be passed proxy
objects.
BUG=chromium:1003919,v8:6949
Change-Id: I2766868543827fc5ee6f99f3b120c7ffe9cfed39
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1803651
Auto-Submit: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63787}
This reimplements the "--time" option of run-tests.py to print the
20 slowest tests, on top of json_test_results infrastructure just
like the bots do it.
Additionally this CL speeds up a bunch of slow tests.
Bug: v8:9396
Change-Id: I40797d2c8c3bfdd310b72f15cd1a035844b7c6f3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1803635
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63786}
This fixes the case where a table entry contains a function constructed
via {WebAssembly.Function} and is then read out via a runtime function
from the table.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
TEST=mjsunit/regress/wasm/regress-crbug-1002388
BUG=chromium:1002388
Change-Id: Ic0a9a544baaf37e68cd22eb91f2ef0bdf5fa5842
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1795352
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63709}
Do not assume that the MaybeHandle that is returned when fetching for a property
is valid and instead check for its contents. Treat an empty handle as not
finding the right property.
Bug: chromium:1002827
Change-Id: Iac158086ec5f66cd9602f4a73ae78de367dd3e77
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1796556
Commit-Queue: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63672}
We don't handle all cases for stores to typed arrays in the builtins
related to storing a property. Bailout to runtime when storing into
a typed array if the property is not found on the object.
Bug: chromium:996161
Change-Id: I684c7c4f526b15cdfb5bfe3fd23218910486a59e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1789396
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63639}
When analyzing functions scopes with the script_scope as parent, don't
skip migrating unresolved variables upwards if we could still be inside
an arrow head, which means accesses to those variables will be
correctly context allocated.
Bug: v8:8510, chromium:1000094
Change-Id: I684f2f8bc692de420203990f93e5c943b5b769c9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1789705
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63635}
{JavaScriptFrame::GetParameters} allocates a new {FixedArray}, hence
all object references need to be handified to survive that allocation.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1000635
Change-Id: I76df5ac109bdb6999fe897bdafaf2175344ecca4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1787429
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63583}
This is a reland of 981aafaf97
It adds double checks to LoadFieldByIndex in the optimizing compiler, which
are likely the source of the crashes.
Original change's description:
> Reland "[ic] In-place Double -> Tagged transitions"
>
> This is a reland of 0736599a69.
> This is a reland of 7e1fbe8f34.
>
> Original change description:
> > [ic] In-place Double -> Tagged transitions
> >
> > With no more MutableHeapNumber, we can make Double -> Tagged transitions
> > in-place, at the cost of an extra map check when accessing double fields
> > to make sure they are still doubles.
> >
> > Bug: v8:9606
> > Change-Id: I74ff39ed6fba62ee223cd37dfe761f7d73020e1c
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1743973
> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63374}
>
> TBR=verwaest@chromium.org, tebbi@chromium.org
>
> Bug: v8:9606
> Change-Id: I2d1b7416064d743582f4983fb868316b7e8a4cf2
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1777661
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63499}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9606
Bug: chromium:997989
Change-Id: Iccfff8e5c6306c9ee4f6c62767dce883b1c6f743
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1784288
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63582}
Use the position of commas in async arrow expressions to mark the
initializer position of any parameters that might have been set in the
preceding parameter.
This extends https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1710671
to async arrow heads.
Bug: v8:8510, chromium:997320
Change-Id: I98e0ac817c7f53fbf1dced98fb6891a386ee7803
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781057
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63542}
This is a reland of 0736599a69.
This is a reland of 7e1fbe8f34.
Original change description:
> [ic] In-place Double -> Tagged transitions
>
> With no more MutableHeapNumber, we can make Double -> Tagged transitions
> in-place, at the cost of an extra map check when accessing double fields
> to make sure they are still doubles.
>
> Bug: v8:9606
> Change-Id: I74ff39ed6fba62ee223cd37dfe761f7d73020e1c
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1743973
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63374}
TBR=verwaest@chromium.org, tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: v8:9606
Change-Id: I2d1b7416064d743582f4983fb868316b7e8a4cf2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1777661
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63499}
When changing the code coverage or type profiler modes, first ensure
there are source positions for all BytecodeArrays as regenerating the
source positions after toggling the mode will result in a bytecode
mismatch.
Bug: v8:9656, v8:8510
Change-Id: Ic6cf3afec1588f11e5ce5fcbea2fd13e4452e15f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1774721
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63484}
Sloppy eval extends the outer declaration scope's context. This is also
true for sloppy eval inside of other sloppy evals -- the outer declaration
scope's context is extended rather than the outer sloppy eval's
declaration scope. However, we consider eval scopes to also be declaration
scopes, for the purposes of strict eval and caching lookup variables. So,
we need to make sure that we skip through sloppy eval scopes when marking
a scope as calls_sloppy_eval.
In fact, we implement this rather as never marking sloppy eval scopes as
calls_sloppy_eval, under the assumption that the parent scope will already
have been marked calls_sloppy_eval by the outer eval.
As a drive-by, fix a TODO to move this logic from calls_sloppy_eval() to
RecordEvalCall(), rename the variable to something more meaningful, and
make Snapshotting to use a new calls_eval bit on Scope.
Bug: chromium:996751
Change-Id: I27ccc7ef429a7ce60b3bb02bf64a3820ae4a2c36
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773247
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63455}
Currently the backing store and elements kind might not aligned aka
backing store can be dictionary where elements kind is frozen/sealed
element kinds or the other way around. The reason is that
Object.preventExtensions change elements kind to DICTIONARY while
Object.seal/freeze change elements kind to SEALED/FROZEN element kind.
Apply both these operations can lead to that problem as in
chromium:992914
To solve this issue, we avoid Object.preventExtensions to change backing
store to dictionary by introducing new nonextensible elements kind.
These new nonextensible elements kind are handled similar to frozen,
sealed element kinds. This change not only fixes the problem but also
optimize the performance of nonextensible objects.
Change-Id: Iffc7f14eb48223c11abf3c577f305d2d072eb65b
Bug: chromium:992914, v8:6831
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1760976
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63432}
This change allows the KeyAccumulator to throw a range error if there
are too many properties to be enumerated.
This CL introduces extensive checks during key enumeration in the run-time,
and might introduce regressions. If so, feel free to revert.
Bug: chromium:918301
Change-Id: I6166c0b15f1a05eac7116a979f12ba4833d1d1b1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1545902
Auto-Submit: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63430}
This fixes an invalid assumption when emitting code for matching '^'
(start of line) in multiline regexps and '\b', '\B' in general.
What we used to do: if the current trace's cp_offset (the offset from
the current position) was non-zero, we assumed that we were looking at
subject string index 1 or greater (i.e.: not at the start of the string
or before).
This is no longer valid since cp_offsets can now be negative.
This CL changes the logic to omit start- and bounds-checks only for
strictly positive cp_offsets, where the above assumption still holds.
Bug: chromium:996391
Change-Id: I79be4fc295c6f0b63e41c13d1e91fdd00f2f2b42
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1771794
Commit-Queue: Erik Corry <erikcorry@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Corry <erikcorry@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63424}
By marking maps detached from the transition tree as prototypes, we'll
automatically stop tracking transitions from those detached fast maps. That
allows us to quickly check whether a map is detached (or the initial map
anyway); and saves memory. We can use this information to ignore sibling type
feedback when parsing a JSON array with many distinctly shaped json objects.
Bug: chromium:993980
Change-Id: I86d493ac2cabec2c31c6e322ad5c5a7ace059dfc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1771778
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63403}
For stores with Double feedback, StoreIC needs to check that the
representation is still Double before doing the store, in case it
accidentally tries to write to an object or worse, mutate a non-mutable
HeapNumber.
Bug: v8:9606
Bug: chromium:997485
Change-Id: I51e0953b40f752648c5e86b8644c23baf636367e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1768373
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63402}
Even when a field is marked const, we may emit multiple consecutive in-literal stores to that field. That is, in 'JSNativeContextSpecialization::BuildPropertyStore', when the access mode is 'kStoreInLiteral' and we are accessing a const field, we may produce a StoreField node, even though another StoreField (that stores something other than 'Uninitialized') to the same const field dominates it. This appears to be sound, since earlier stores to literals cannot be observed anyways.
Unfortunately this behavior conflicts with the double const store invariant in load elimination: Roughly speaking, we assume that load elimination may never observe two consecutive const stores to the same field on the same object.
The apparent solution would be to treat 'kStoreInLiteral' accesses like regular 'kStore' accesses: For consecutive stores to const properties we don't emit StoreField, but instead emit code that checks whether the value about to be written is equivalent to the previously written one, and otherwise deopt ('DeoptimizeReason::kWrongValue'). Unfortunately this turns out impractical, since for 'kStoreInLiteral' accesses we can't easily decide whether we're dealing with the first such store or one of the consecutive ones. Also see this abandoned CL: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1762020.
This CL instead adds an exception to the invariant in load elimination. We track whether a store arose from a 'kStoreInLiteral' access, and use this information when visiting StoreField nodes in load elimination.
R=neis@chromium.org, tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:987205
Change-Id: I8829752aa0637e9599677d20aad2d706d40d7fe6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1763535
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Schmid <gsps@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63385}
In order to reflect web reality, TC39 has made some slight changes to
name descriptors, see https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1490 for
details. V8 was mostly already in compliance with these changes, but
ThrowTypeError and anonymous classes needed some slight changes.
Bug: v8:9646
Change-Id: I163238954938f0c005e3adbc61b90498e01436da
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1764622
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joshua Litt <joshualitt@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63373}
Since the mutability of HeapNumbers is determined by their owning
object's descriptor array, we can remove the MutableHeapNumber type
entirely, at the cost of a few fewer DCHECKs and a couple of TODOs
to use the descriptor array information.
This is a necessary step towards a follow-up which allows in-place
Double -> Tagged transitions
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VeKIskAakxQFnUBNkhBmVswgR7Vk6T1kAyKRLhqerb4/
Bug: v8:9606
Change-Id: I13209f9c86f1f204088f6fd80089e17d956b4a50
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1743972
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63294}
Fixes bytecode mismatch between lazy and non-lazy where "this" was
marked as maybe assigned in constructors that called the super
constructor. Since this will return the hole in cases where it was not
yet initialized by super (and the hole is explicitly handled by
JSContextSpecialization::ReduceJSLoadContext), it's safe to treat it as
a constant in all cases. In the case of lazy compilation case, "this"
is never added to the ScopeInfo so is never seen as mutable.
Bug: chromium:994719
Change-Id: I43478fbc626b19eb1533aa9dec61b7f276ae140b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1762025
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63283}
This CL adds additional information in PropertyAccessInfos and FieldAccesses about the map that introduced the accessed field. We use this information to prevent load elimination from incorrectly optimizing certain accesses marked const.
Prior to this CL, load elimination simply stored information about eliminatable field accesses based on objects (identified by nodes in the graph) and offsets (i.e., statically known ones). In the presence of const stores and loads this is insufficient, since a single object (in the above sense) may contain distinct *const* properties at the same offset throughout its lifetime. As an example, consider the following piece of code:
let obj = {};
obj.a = 0;
obj[1024] = 1; // An offset of >=1024 forces an elements-kind transition
delete obj.a;
obj.b = 2;
assertEquals(obj.b, 2);
In this scenario, *both* the first ('obj.a = 0') and the second ('obj.b = 2') store to a field will be marked const by the runtime. The reason that storing to 'a' above ends up being marked const, is that 'a' before and after the elements-kind transition is encoded in separate transition trees. Removing 'a' ('delete obj.a') only invalidates const-ness in the dictionary-elements transition tree; not the holey-elements one used at the time of 'obj.a = 0'.
The above situation on its own violates an invariant in load elimination. Namely, we assume that for the same object and offset, we will never encounter two const stores. One can extend the above snippet to coax load-elimination into producing incorrect results. For instance, by "hiding" 'obj.b = 2' in an unoptimized function call, the consecutive load from 'b' will incorrectly produce 0, violating the assert.
R=neis@chromium.org, tebbi@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:980183, chromium:983764
Change-Id: I576a9c7efd416fa9db6daff1f42d483e4bd369b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1751346
Commit-Queue: Georg Schmid <gsps@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63226}
Fixes DCHECK failure in DropStackFrameCacheCommon by returning early if
the source_position_table is Exception.
Bug: chromium:990582, v8:8510
Change-Id: I671f3e0cdc9f880dedf8ecd2fffb1083229dc6dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1752856
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63209}
Otherwise there is a mismatch between eager parsing (where the reciever
is marked as MaybeAssigned) and lazy parsing (where the receiver is
deserialized and not marked MaybeAssigned) for arrow functions that
have an inner scope that calls eval.
BUG=chromium:989914
Change-Id: I8b8b78140858985a75a971b0e0a95bd61463457b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1752851
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63206}
When GC triggered while an exception is pending, a read to
memory that was no longer valid could happen while backtracking in the
regexp interpreter (introduced with commit fb0df2c).
This CL prevents this dirty read, that could have been a security issue.
Bug: chromium:992389, v8:9575
Change-Id: Ie1acd6faa16665e211666c6a8dcf2a9d74e0c886
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1751342
Commit-Queue: Patrick Thier <pthier@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63195}
When a RelocatingCharacterStream is Seeked, it's buffer_pos_ could be set a non-zero value.
However, UpdateBufferPointers was assuming the position was zero to relocate the buffer_start_
and buffer_end_, which would lead to the stream becoming misaligned. Fix this and add a
unittest and the clusterfuzz script which highlighted the issue.
BUG=chromium:991133
Change-Id: I20dd510b3dcc5df6df058b7e06d2c8a838aef855
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1751782
Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63190}
The spec says we have to insert some wrapper code with extra line breaks
in it, but this confuses users when they see stack traces as the line
numbers come from the code with the wrapper, instead of the original.
This CL sets line_offset on the script to indicate that line numbers
should be offset by the 2 extra line breaks when reading them out e.g.
for the purpose of stack traces.
Bug: chromium:109362
Change-Id: Ib608e1043c38b595b1466766f7592e993ee3b996
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1741660
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63127}
When a fast path was added for Math.hypot, the algorithm was also
simplified. This simplification turns out to be incorrect in some rare
edge cases. This cl reverts back to the original algorithm and converts it to torque.
Original cl: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1684178
Bug: v8:9546
Change-Id: If4e21504732f46081a8de823f50f499917f1a20c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1725200
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63070}
For variable proxies in a function inside an eval scope that point to
a dynamic variable in the eval scope, the current scope resolution will
find this variable only when the function is eagerly compiled, as the
eval scope only exists during top-level eval compilation. This causes
a mismatch between lazy- and eager- compiled functions.
With this patch, we skip these dynamic variables during lookup, so that
the lookup for the variable proxy always finds a kDynamicLocal or
kDynamicGlobal, both when compiled lazily and eagerly. This is a minor
pessimisation of performance (as we know that the lookup has to be
dynamic), but unblocks other improvements which require idempotent
bytecode generation (such as lazy source positions).
Note that the alternative, of simply not tracking dynamic variables on
the eval scope at all, is not viable due to needing this information
during conflict detection.
Bug: v8:8510
Bug: v8:9511
Change-Id: Ifa72ec05e9a97b7be418912340081b9656765fd4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1733077
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63051}
When the flag is on and some of the functions don't have bytecode,
we should gracefully print "no bytecode" instead of crashing.
Bug: chromium:983267
Change-Id: Id4e3385cd871a2dd5bead38c29a41b38319cc8d3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1731003
Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63031}
