For historical reasons, the interpreter's bytecode expectations tests
required a type for the constant pool. This had two disadvantages:
1. Strings and numbers were not visible in mixed pools, and
2. Mismatches of pool types (e.g. when rebaselining) would cause parser
errors
This removes the pool types, making everything 'mixed', but appending
the values to string and number valued constants. Specifying a pool type
in the *.golden header now prints a warning (for backwards compatibility).
BUG=v8:5350
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2310103002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39216}
This way, many files which only need CompilationInfo but not compiler.h
and its dependencies can include just compilation-info.h.
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2284313003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39038}
This allows using icu data, bundled in the icudtl.dat file,
to be loaded automatically from a default location
side-by-side with the executable.
The v8 stand-alone default is still to use statically
linked ICU data, but this will be switched in a separate
follow-up CL.
BUG=chromium:616033
LOG=y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2042253002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36823}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
Runtime errors will be suppressed in --rebaseline mode, unless the
--verbose flag is passed.
The reasoning behind (rebaseline && !verbose) and not just (verbose)
is to suppress harmless noise while updating the expectation for
existing, known good snippets, without hiding actually relevant
errors when the tool is used to write new expectation files.
In fact, some tests are supposed to produce a runtime error, which
might nevertheless alarm a developer who is just --rebaseline'ing.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1742723003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34385}
When operating in --rebaseline mode, each of the files will be updated.
In --raw-js mode, all the expectations will be written to the same file.
In default mode no more than one input file is accepted.
On POSIX systems, --rebaseline will autodiscover golden files when run
from the project root and no input file is provided.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1737623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34324}
Bytecode expectations have been moved to external (.golden) files,
one per test. Each test in the suite builds a representation of the
the compiled bytecode using BytecodeExpectationsPrinter. The output is
then compared to the golden file. If the comparision fails, a textual
diff can be used to identify the discrepancies.
Only the test snippets are left in the cc file, which also allows to
make it more compact and meaningful. Leaving the snippets in the cc
file was a deliberate choice to allow keeping the "truth" about the
tests in the cc file, which will rarely change, as opposed to golden
files.
Golden files can be generated and kept up to date using
generate-bytecode-expectations, which also means that the test suite
can be batch updated whenever the bytecode or golden format changes.
The golden format has been slightly amended (no more comments about
`void*`, add size of the bytecode array) following the consideration
made while converting the tests.
There is also a fix: BytecodeExpectationsPrinter::top_level_ was left
uninitialized, leading to undefined behaviour.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1717293002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34285}
--pool-type=int and double have now been merged into number.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1717633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34164}
FLAG_legacy_const and FLAG_harmony_do_expressions can now be toggled
both through the command line and through the option header.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1716793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34160}
A few options and features have been added to the tool:
* an output file might be specified using --output=file.name
* a shortcut when the output file is also the input, which is handy
when fixing golden files, --rebaseline.
* the input snippet might be optionally not wrapped in a top function,
or not executed after compilation (--no-wrap and --no-execute).
* the name of the wrapper can be configured using --wrapper-name=foo
The same options can be configured via setters on the usual
BytecodeExpectationsPrinter.
The output file now includes all the relevant flags to reproduce it
when running again through the tool (usually with --rebaseline).
In particular, when running in --rebaseline mode, options from the
file header will override options specified in the command line.
A couple of other fixes and improvements:
* description of the handlers is now emitted (closing the TODO).
* the snippet is now correctly unquoted when double quotes are used.
* special registers (closure, context etc.) are now emitted as such,
instead of displaying their numeric value.
* the tool can now process top level code as well.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1698403002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34152}
Now the tool produces a far more readable output format, which bears a
lot of resemblance to YAML. In fact, the output should be machine
parseable as such, one document per testcase. However, the output format
may be subject to changes in future, so don't rely on this property.
In general, the output format has been optimized for producing a meaningful
textual diff, while keeping a decent readability as well. Therefore, not
everything is as compact as it could be, e.g. for an empty const pool we get:
constant pool: [
]
instead of:
constant pool: []
Also, trailing commas are always inserted in lists.
Additionally, now the tool accepts its output format as input. When
operating in this mode, all the snippets are extracted, processed and
the output is then emitted as usual. If nothing has changed, the output
should match the input. This is very useful for catching bugs in the
bytecode generation by running a textual diff against a known-good file.
The core (namely bytecode-expectations.cc) has been extracted from the
original cc file, which provides the utility as usual. The definitions
in the matching header of the library have been moved into the
v8::internal::interpreter namespace.
The library exposes a class ExpectationPrinter, with a method
PrintExpectation, which takes a test snippet as input, and writes the
formatted expectation to the supplied stream. One might then use a
std::stringstream to retrieve the results as a string and run it through
a diff utility.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1688383003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33997}
Apparently, this BytecodeArrayIterator method was missed during the
previous refactor. No other (collateral) change was done.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1691433002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33909}
This is a follow-up to https://crrev.com/1671863002, adding the
capability to print the contents of the constant pool. The expected
type of the pool is taken from command line, and it's either:
* string/int/double: assume all constants have the specified type.
This way, we can emit a meaningful representation, e.g. a quoted
string for type string and so on. All the constants in the pool must
have the same type, otherwise one or more CHECK() will fail and the
program will eventually crash.
* mixed: print the InstanceType tag instead of the actual value.
This is the choice for those tests where the type of the constants in
the pool is not uniform, however only a type tag is printed, not the
actual value of the entries. SMIs are an exception, since they do not
have an InstanceType tag, so kInstanceTypeDontCare is printed instead.
In addition to that, functions Print{ExpectedSnippet,BytecodeSequence}
have been extracted with no functional change. It's just for improving
readability, since the code is becoming quite long.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1686963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33888}
The previous implementation used GetRawOperand(), which allows a nicely
unified handling of all scalar types, but returns an unsigned type.
Because of this, generate-bytecode-expectations couldn't properly handle
negative numbers.
This commit differentiate between different types of scalar operands and
uses the appropriate getter from i::interpreter::BytecodeArrayIterator,
thus correctly handling signed types where needed.
Two new helpers have been added to i::interpreter::Bytecodes:
* IsImmediateOperandType()
* IsIndexOperandType()
with the intuitive semantic.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1684113002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33874}
generate-bytecode-expectations is a tool intended to work together
with test/cctest/test-bytecode-generator.cc in order to produce a
meaningful diff between testcases and the actual bytecode being emitted.
It does so by parsing and compiling Javascript to bytecode,
constructing the same data structure in the testcase and then running a
textual diff between the expected (i.e. the one encoded in the unit test)
and actual (i.e. the one built from the compiler output) representation.
This commit is a first step in this direction, achieving just the first
half of what we desire. At the moment, bytecodechecker can:
* take a code snippet from the command line and emit the expected structure.
* adhere to the same formatting rules of the test cases
(this one is important for text diff and for copy and pasting too)
Still to do:
* parse unit tests:
+ extract code snippets
+ indent the code to match the input test case
+ allow flexibility in the input format
+ try to recognize and work around some macro magic (i.e. REPEAT_127)
* emit the representation of the constant pool and handlers vector
* run a textual diff
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1671863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33863}
