This is a reland of c71fd20cf9
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Data structures for JIT-ing wasm to native memory.
>
> This CL introduces the structures for JIT-ing wasm on the native heap.
> They are described in detail at go/wasm-on-native-heap-stage-1
>
> Briefly:
> - WasmCodeManager manages memory for modules and offers an interior
> pointer lookup (i.e. PC -> WasmCode)
> - WasmCode represents code, including reloc info. It holds wasm
> specific data, like function index, and runtime information, like trap
> handler info.
> - NativeModule manages memory for one module.
>
> Tests cover the allocation and lookup aspects, following that current
> regression tests cover the JITed code. A separate CL will enable
> JITing using the new data structures.
>
> Bug: v8:6876
> Change-Id: I1731238409001fe97c97eafb7a12fd3922da6a42
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/767581
> Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49501}
Bug: v8:6876
Change-Id: Ifd1a4c23de8150dbdc75f059cd657e9670b15c9b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/779680
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49512}
This reverts commit c71fd20cf9.
Reason for revert: msvc is unhappy (https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win64%20-%20msvc/builds/208)
Original change's description:
> [wasm] Data structures for JIT-ing wasm to native memory.
>
> This CL introduces the structures for JIT-ing wasm on the native heap.
> They are described in detail at go/wasm-on-native-heap-stage-1
>
> Briefly:
> - WasmCodeManager manages memory for modules and offers an interior
> pointer lookup (i.e. PC -> WasmCode)
> - WasmCode represents code, including reloc info. It holds wasm
> specific data, like function index, and runtime information, like trap
> handler info.
> - NativeModule manages memory for one module.
>
> Tests cover the allocation and lookup aspects, following that current
> regression tests cover the JITed code. A separate CL will enable JITing
> using the new data structures.
>
> Bug: v8:6876
> Change-Id: I1731238409001fe97c97eafb7a12fd3922da6a42
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/767581
> Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49501}
TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,mlippautz@chromium.org
Change-Id: Id54deb74782c6f0fd06c61ddcabb727eb7010333
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:6876
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/779679
Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49503}
This CL introduces the structures for JIT-ing wasm on the native heap.
They are described in detail at go/wasm-on-native-heap-stage-1
Briefly:
- WasmCodeManager manages memory for modules and offers an interior
pointer lookup (i.e. PC -> WasmCode)
- WasmCode represents code, including reloc info. It holds wasm
specific data, like function index, and runtime information, like trap
handler info.
- NativeModule manages memory for one module.
Tests cover the allocation and lookup aspects, following that current
regression tests cover the JITed code. A separate CL will enable JITing
using the new data structures.
Bug: v8:6876
Change-Id: I1731238409001fe97c97eafb7a12fd3922da6a42
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/767581
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49501}
Merge better captures the upcoming usecase in the wasm native heap,
where allocating/freeing is moving the accounting of memory from
a free list to an allocated list and vice-versa - making 'Release'
an odd API when allocating.
Bug:
Change-Id: I9010959c91a1e8585eb06303ab06078132a03f60
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/688004
Reviewed-by: Eric Holk <eholk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48211}
This reverts commit ee5c31f335.
Reason for revert: Fixed compiler failure
Original change's description:
> Revert "[wasm] A simple allocator datastructure for off-the heap"
>
> This reverts commit 110d9ab005.
>
> Reason for revert: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20debug%20builder/builds/26607
>
> Surprising we're seeing a failure on Linux 64 *after* CQ. Is the compiler there different?
>
> Original change's description:
> > [wasm] A simple allocator datastructure for off-the heap
> >
> > We'll use this allocator in a follow-up CL to:
> > - allocate speculative sizes of memory for a module that's being
> > compiled (e.g. 2*size of wasm code).
> > - each module will own such a sub-pool, and then use it to allocate
> > contiguous chunks of memory for code.
> >
> > The underlying assumptions for the chosen allocation strategy is that:
> > - the allocation granularity for pools is 1 page, so that no one page
> > is owned by more than one wasm module
> > - typical pool sizes (given module sizes) are multiple pages.
> > - modules and module instances are typically few and long lived. Typically,
> > we expect one module and one instance.
> >
> > This means we shouldn't expect fragmentations that lead to code being
> > non-allocatable, or prohibitively many ranges.
> >
> > The data structure just manages ranges of addresses. Virtual memory management
> > will be separate, as part of the responsibility of a "WasmHeap"
> > that will be introduced in the future. So will concurrency control.
> >
> > Bug:
> > Change-Id: Id99f46d10c25553b013054d994760f3c2a737c39
> > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/669296
> > Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Holk <eholk@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48053}
>
> TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,eholk@chromium.org
>
> Change-Id: Id82fa341b77624e4971f24c4757a9a666a65930c
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/670141
> Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48054}
TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,eholk@chromium.org
Change-Id: Ib6a7a3e6098d2689e60cdca85ec77e57e5295e48
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/670142
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48055}
This reverts commit 110d9ab005.
Reason for revert: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20-%20debug%20builder/builds/26607
Surprising we're seeing a failure on Linux 64 *after* CQ. Is the compiler there different?
Original change's description:
> [wasm] A simple allocator datastructure for off-the heap
>
> We'll use this allocator in a follow-up CL to:
> - allocate speculative sizes of memory for a module that's being
> compiled (e.g. 2*size of wasm code).
> - each module will own such a sub-pool, and then use it to allocate
> contiguous chunks of memory for code.
>
> The underlying assumptions for the chosen allocation strategy is that:
> - the allocation granularity for pools is 1 page, so that no one page
> is owned by more than one wasm module
> - typical pool sizes (given module sizes) are multiple pages.
> - modules and module instances are typically few and long lived. Typically,
> we expect one module and one instance.
>
> This means we shouldn't expect fragmentations that lead to code being
> non-allocatable, or prohibitively many ranges.
>
> The data structure just manages ranges of addresses. Virtual memory management
> will be separate, as part of the responsibility of a "WasmHeap"
> that will be introduced in the future. So will concurrency control.
>
> Bug:
> Change-Id: Id99f46d10c25553b013054d994760f3c2a737c39
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/669296
> Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Holk <eholk@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48053}
TBR=bradnelson@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org,eholk@chromium.org
Change-Id: Id82fa341b77624e4971f24c4757a9a666a65930c
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/670141
Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48054}
We'll use this allocator in a follow-up CL to:
- allocate speculative sizes of memory for a module that's being
compiled (e.g. 2*size of wasm code).
- each module will own such a sub-pool, and then use it to allocate
contiguous chunks of memory for code.
The underlying assumptions for the chosen allocation strategy is that:
- the allocation granularity for pools is 1 page, so that no one page
is owned by more than one wasm module
- typical pool sizes (given module sizes) are multiple pages.
- modules and module instances are typically few and long lived. Typically,
we expect one module and one instance.
This means we shouldn't expect fragmentations that lead to code being
non-allocatable, or prohibitively many ranges.
The data structure just manages ranges of addresses. Virtual memory management
will be separate, as part of the responsibility of a "WasmHeap"
that will be introduced in the future. So will concurrency control.
Bug:
Change-Id: Id99f46d10c25553b013054d994760f3c2a737c39
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/669296
Commit-Queue: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Holk <eholk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Nelson <bradnelson@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48053}
