a269ce201d
This reverts commitd8f8a7e210
. Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976 Original change's description: > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland ofb8f9166664
> Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > } > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > for consistency. > > Original change's description: > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10577 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782 Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
70 lines
2.7 KiB
JavaScript
70 lines
2.7 KiB
JavaScript
// Copyright 2015 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
// Flags: --random-seed=20 --nostress-opt --noalways-opt --predictable
|
|
|
|
(function() {
|
|
var kHistory = 2;
|
|
var kRepeats = 100;
|
|
var history = new Uint32Array(kHistory);
|
|
|
|
function random() {
|
|
return (Math.random() * Math.pow(2, 32)) >>> 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function ChiSquared(m, n) {
|
|
var ys_minus_np1 = (m - n / 2.0);
|
|
var chi_squared_1 = ys_minus_np1 * ys_minus_np1 * 2.0 / n;
|
|
var ys_minus_np2 = ((n - m) - n / 2.0);
|
|
var chi_squared_2 = ys_minus_np2 * ys_minus_np2 * 2.0 / n;
|
|
return chi_squared_1 + chi_squared_2;
|
|
}
|
|
for (var predictor_bit = -2; predictor_bit < 32; predictor_bit++) {
|
|
// The predicted bit is one of the bits from the PRNG.
|
|
for (var random_bit = 0; random_bit < 32; random_bit++) {
|
|
for (var ago = 0; ago < kHistory; ago++) {
|
|
// We don't want to check whether each bit predicts itself.
|
|
if (ago == 0 && predictor_bit == random_bit) continue;
|
|
// Enter the new random value into the history
|
|
for (var i = ago; i >= 0; i--) {
|
|
history[i] = random();
|
|
}
|
|
// Find out how many of the bits are the same as the prediction bit.
|
|
var m = 0;
|
|
for (var i = 0; i < kRepeats; i++) {
|
|
for (var j = ago - 1; j >= 0; j--) history[j + 1] = history[j];
|
|
history[0] = random();
|
|
var predicted;
|
|
if (predictor_bit >= 0) {
|
|
predicted = (history[ago] >> predictor_bit) & 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
predicted = predictor_bit == -2 ? 0 : 1;
|
|
}
|
|
var bit = (history[0] >> random_bit) & 1;
|
|
if (bit == predicted) m++;
|
|
}
|
|
// Chi squared analysis for k = 2 (2, states: same/not-same) and one
|
|
// degree of freedom (k - 1).
|
|
var chi_squared = ChiSquared(m, kRepeats);
|
|
if (chi_squared > 24) {
|
|
var percent = Math.floor(m * 100.0 / kRepeats);
|
|
if (predictor_bit < 0) {
|
|
var bit_value = predictor_bit == -2 ? 0 : 1;
|
|
print(`Bit ${random_bit} is ${bit_value} ${percent}% of the time`);
|
|
} else {
|
|
print(`Bit ${random_bit} is the same as bit ${predictor_bit} ` +
|
|
`${ago} ago ${percent}% of the time`);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// For 1 degree of freedom this corresponds to 1 in a million. We are
|
|
// running ~8000 tests, so that would be surprising.
|
|
assertTrue(chi_squared <= 24);
|
|
// If the predictor bit is a fixed 0 or 1 then it makes no sense to
|
|
// repeat the test with a different age.
|
|
if (predictor_bit < 0) break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})();
|