v8/test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
littledan 95145fa826 Ship ES2015 sloppy-mode const semantics
This patch moves the semantics of 'const' in sloppy mode to match those
in strict mode, that is, const makes lexical (let-like) bindings, must
have an initializer, and does not create properties of the global object.

R=adamk
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:3305
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571873004

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33218}
2016-01-11 23:09:59 +00:00

229 lines
7.6 KiB
JavaScript

// Copyright 2008 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
// met:
//
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
// disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
// with the distribution.
// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
// from this software without specific prior written permission.
//
// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
// Flags: --legacy-const
// Test for const semantics.
function CheckException(e) {
var string = e.toString();
var index = string.indexOf(':');
assertTrue(index >= 0);
var name = string.slice(0, index);
assertTrue(string.indexOf("has already been declared") >= 0 ||
string.indexOf("redeclaration") >= 0);
if (name == 'SyntaxError') return 'TypeError';
return name;
}
function TestLocal(s,e) {
try {
return eval("(function(){" + s + ";return " + e + "})")();
} catch (x) {
return CheckException(x);
}
}
function TestContext(s,e) {
try {
// Use a with-statement to force the system to do dynamic
// declarations of the introduced variables or constants.
with ({}) {
return eval(s + ";" + e);
}
} catch (x) {
return CheckException(x);
}
}
function TestAll(expected,s,opt_e) {
var e = "";
var msg = s;
if (opt_e) { e = opt_e; msg += "; " + opt_e; }
assertEquals(expected, TestLocal(s,e), "local:'" + msg + "'");
assertEquals(expected, TestContext(s,e), "context:'" + msg + "'");
}
function TestConflict(def0, def1) {
// No eval.
TestAll("TypeError", def0 +'; ' + def1);
// Eval everything.
TestAll("TypeError", 'eval("' + def0 + '; ' + def1 + '")');
// Eval first definition.
TestAll("TypeError", 'eval("' + def0 +'"); ' + def1);
// Eval second definition.
TestAll("TypeError", def0 + '; eval("' + def1 +'")');
// Eval both definitions separately.
TestAll("TypeError", 'eval("' + def0 +'"); eval("' + def1 + '")');
}
// Test conflicting definitions.
TestConflict("const x", "var x");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "var x");
TestConflict("const x", "var x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "var x = 0");
TestConflict("var x", "const x");
TestConflict("var x = 0", "const x");
TestConflict("var x", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("var x = 0", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "var x");
TestConflict("const x", "var x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "var x = undefined");
TestConflict("var x = undefined", "const x");
TestConflict("var x", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("var x = undefined", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "var x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "var x = undefined");
TestConflict("var x = undefined", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("var x = 0", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x", "function x() { }");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "function x() { }");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "function x() { }");
TestConflict("function x() { }", "const x");
TestConflict("function x() { }", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("function x() { }", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x, y", "var x");
TestConflict("const x, y", "var y");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y", "var x");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y", "var y");
TestConflict("const x, y = 0", "var x");
TestConflict("const x, y = 0", "var y");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y = 0", "var x");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y = 0", "var y");
TestConflict("var x", "const x, y");
TestConflict("var y", "const x, y");
TestConflict("var x", "const x = 0, y");
TestConflict("var y", "const x = 0, y");
TestConflict("var x", "const x, y = 0");
TestConflict("var y", "const x, y = 0");
TestConflict("var x", "const x = 0, y = 0");
TestConflict("var y", "const x = 0, y = 0");
// Test that multiple conflicts do not cause issues.
TestConflict("var x, y", "const x, y");
// Test that repeated const declarations throw redeclaration errors.
TestConflict("const x", "const x");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "const x");
TestConflict("const x", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "const x");
TestConflict("const x", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x = undefined", "const x = 0");
TestConflict("const x = 0", "const x = undefined");
TestConflict("const x, y", "const x");
TestConflict("const x, y", "const y");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y", "const x");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y", "const y");
TestConflict("const x, y = 0", "const x");
TestConflict("const x, y = 0", "const y");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y = 0", "const x");
TestConflict("const x = 0, y = 0", "const y");
TestConflict("const x", "const x, y");
TestConflict("const y", "const x, y");
TestConflict("const x", "const x = 0, y");
TestConflict("const y", "const x = 0, y");
TestConflict("const x", "const x, y = 0");
TestConflict("const y", "const x, y = 0");
TestConflict("const x", "const x = 0, y = 0");
TestConflict("const y", "const x = 0, y = 0");
// Test that multiple const conflicts do not cause issues.
TestConflict("const x, y", "const x, y");
// Test that const inside loop behaves correctly.
var loop = "for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) { const x = i; }";
TestAll(0, loop, "x");
TestAll(0, "var a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h; " + loop, "x");
// Test that const inside with behaves correctly.
TestAll(87, "with ({x:42}) { const x = 87; }", "x");
TestAll(undefined, "with ({x:42}) { const x; }", "x");
// Additional tests for how various combinations of re-declarations affect
// the values of the var/const in question.
try {
eval("var undefined;");
} catch (ex) {
assertUnreachable("undefined (1) has thrown");
}
var original_undef = undefined;
var undefined = 1; // Should be silently ignored.
assertEquals(original_undef, undefined, "undefined got overwritten");
undefined = original_undef;
const e = 1; eval('var e = 2');
assertEquals(1, e, "e has wrong value");
const h; eval('var h = 1');
assertEquals(undefined, h, "h has wrong value");
eval("Object.defineProperty(this, 'i', { writable: true });"
+ "const i = 7;"
+ "assertEquals(7, i, \"i has wrong value\");");
var global = this;
Object.defineProperty(global, 'j', { value: 100, writable: true });
assertEquals(100, j);
// The const declaration stays configurable, so the declaration above goes
// through even though the const declaration is hoisted above.
const j = 2;
assertEquals(2, j, "j has wrong value");
var k = 1;
try { eval('const k'); } catch(e) { }
assertEquals(1, k, "k has wrong value");
try { eval('const k = 10'); } catch(e) { }
assertEquals(1, k, "k has wrong value");