v8/tools/testrunner/local/statusfile.py
Michal Majewski 533820fe83 [test] Move loading status file to base runner
Bug: v8:6917
Change-Id: I2fb63e05336798606dee558d4adc253d5aace040
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/897807
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michał Majewski <majeski@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51038}
2018-02-01 15:32:59 +00:00

333 lines
11 KiB
Python

# Copyright 2012 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
# met:
#
# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
# disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
# with the distribution.
# * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
# contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
# from this software without specific prior written permission.
#
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
# "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
# OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
# SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
# LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
# DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
# THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
# (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
# OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
import os
import re
from variants import ALL_VARIANTS
from utils import Freeze
# Possible outcomes
FAIL = "FAIL"
PASS = "PASS"
TIMEOUT = "TIMEOUT"
CRASH = "CRASH"
# Outcomes only for status file, need special handling
FAIL_OK = "FAIL_OK"
FAIL_SLOPPY = "FAIL_SLOPPY"
# Modifiers
SKIP = "SKIP"
SLOW = "SLOW"
NO_VARIANTS = "NO_VARIANTS"
ALWAYS = "ALWAYS"
KEYWORDS = {}
for key in [SKIP, FAIL, PASS, CRASH, SLOW, FAIL_OK, NO_VARIANTS, FAIL_SLOPPY,
ALWAYS]:
KEYWORDS[key] = key
# Support arches, modes to be written as keywords instead of strings.
VARIABLES = {ALWAYS: True}
for var in ["debug", "release", "big", "little",
"android_arm", "android_arm64", "android_ia32", "android_x64",
"arm", "arm64", "ia32", "mips", "mipsel", "mips64", "mips64el",
"x64", "ppc", "ppc64", "s390", "s390x", "macos", "windows",
"linux", "aix"]:
VARIABLES[var] = var
# Allow using variants as keywords.
for var in ALL_VARIANTS:
VARIABLES[var] = var
class StatusFile(object):
def __init__(self, path, variables):
"""
_rules: {variant: {test name: [rule]}}
_prefix_rules: {variant: {test name prefix: [rule]}}
"""
with open(path) as f:
self._rules, self._prefix_rules = ReadStatusFile(f.read(), variables)
def get_outcomes(self, testname, variant=None):
"""Merges variant dependent and independent rules."""
outcomes = frozenset()
for key in set([variant or '', '']):
rules = self._rules.get(key, {})
prefix_rules = self._prefix_rules.get(key, {})
if testname in rules:
outcomes |= rules[testname]
for prefix in prefix_rules:
if testname.startswith(prefix):
outcomes |= prefix_rules[prefix]
return outcomes
def warn_unused_rules(self, tests, check_variant_rules=False):
"""Finds and prints unused rules in status file.
Rule X is unused when it doesn't apply to any tests, which can also mean
that all matching tests were skipped by another rule before evaluating X.
Args:
tests: list of pairs (testname, variant)
check_variant_rules: if set variant dependent rules are checked
"""
if check_variant_rules:
variants = list(ALL_VARIANTS)
else:
variants = ['']
used_rules = set()
for testname, variant in tests:
variant = variant or ''
if testname in self._rules.get(variant, {}):
used_rules.add((testname, variant))
if SKIP in self._rules[variant][testname]:
continue
for prefix in self._prefix_rules.get(variant, {}):
if testname.startswith(prefix):
used_rules.add((prefix, variant))
if SKIP in self._prefix_rules[variant][prefix]:
break
for variant in variants:
for rule, value in (
list(self._rules.get(variant, {}).iteritems()) +
list(self._prefix_rules.get(variant, {}).iteritems())):
if (rule, variant) not in used_rules:
if variant == '':
variant_desc = 'variant independent'
else:
variant_desc = 'variant: %s' % variant
print 'Unused rule: %s -> %s (%s)' % (rule, value, variant_desc)
def _JoinsPassAndFail(outcomes1, outcomes2):
"""Indicates if we join PASS and FAIL from two different outcome sets and
the first doesn't already contain both.
"""
return (
PASS in outcomes1 and
not (FAIL in outcomes1 or FAIL_OK in outcomes1) and
(FAIL in outcomes2 or FAIL_OK in outcomes2)
)
VARIANT_EXPRESSION = object()
def _EvalExpression(exp, variables):
"""Evaluates expression and returns its result. In case of NameError caused by
undefined "variant" identifier returns VARIANT_EXPRESSION marker.
"""
try:
return eval(exp, variables)
except NameError as e:
identifier = re.match("name '(.*)' is not defined", e.message).group(1)
assert identifier == "variant", "Unknown identifier: %s" % identifier
return VARIANT_EXPRESSION
def _EvalVariantExpression(
condition, section, variables, variant, rules, prefix_rules):
variables_with_variant = dict(variables)
variables_with_variant["variant"] = variant
result = _EvalExpression(condition, variables_with_variant)
assert result != VARIANT_EXPRESSION
if result is True:
_ReadSection(
section,
variables_with_variant,
rules[variant],
prefix_rules[variant],
)
else:
assert result is False, "Make sure expressions evaluate to boolean values"
def _ParseOutcomeList(rule, outcomes, variables, target_dict):
"""Outcome list format: [condition, outcome, outcome, ...]"""
result = set([])
if type(outcomes) == str:
outcomes = [outcomes]
for item in outcomes:
if type(item) == str:
result.add(item)
elif type(item) == list:
condition = item[0]
exp = _EvalExpression(condition, variables)
assert exp != VARIANT_EXPRESSION, (
"Nested variant expressions are not supported")
if exp is False:
continue
# Ensure nobody uses an identifier by mistake, like "default",
# which would evaluate to true here otherwise.
assert exp is True, "Make sure expressions evaluate to boolean values"
for outcome in item[1:]:
assert type(outcome) == str
result.add(outcome)
else:
assert False
if len(result) == 0:
return
if rule in target_dict:
# A FAIL without PASS in one rule has always precedence over a single
# PASS (without FAIL) in another. Otherwise the default PASS expectation
# in a rule with a modifier (e.g. PASS, SLOW) would be joined to a FAIL
# from another rule (which intended to mark a test as FAIL and not as
# PASS and FAIL).
if _JoinsPassAndFail(target_dict[rule], result):
target_dict[rule] -= set([PASS])
if _JoinsPassAndFail(result, target_dict[rule]):
result -= set([PASS])
target_dict[rule] |= result
else:
target_dict[rule] = result
def ReadContent(content):
return eval(content, KEYWORDS)
def ReadStatusFile(content, variables):
"""Status file format
Status file := [section]
section = [CONDITION, section_rules]
section_rules := {path: outcomes}
outcomes := outcome | [outcome, ...]
outcome := SINGLE_OUTCOME | [CONDITION, SINGLE_OUTCOME, SINGLE_OUTCOME, ...]
"""
# Empty defaults for rules and prefix_rules. Variant-independent
# rules are mapped by "", others by the variant name.
rules = {variant: {} for variant in ALL_VARIANTS}
rules[""] = {}
prefix_rules = {variant: {} for variant in ALL_VARIANTS}
prefix_rules[""] = {}
variables.update(VARIABLES)
for conditional_section in ReadContent(content):
assert type(conditional_section) == list
assert len(conditional_section) == 2
condition, section = conditional_section
exp = _EvalExpression(condition, variables)
# The expression is variant-independent and evaluates to False.
if exp is False:
continue
# The expression is variant-independent and evaluates to True.
if exp is True:
_ReadSection(
section,
variables,
rules[''],
prefix_rules[''],
)
continue
# The expression is variant-dependent (contains "variant" keyword)
if exp == VARIANT_EXPRESSION:
# If the expression contains one or more "variant" keywords, we evaluate
# it for all possible variants and create rules for those that apply.
for variant in ALL_VARIANTS:
_EvalVariantExpression(
condition, section, variables, variant, rules, prefix_rules)
continue
assert False, "Make sure expressions evaluate to boolean values"
return Freeze(rules), Freeze(prefix_rules)
def _ReadSection(section, variables, rules, prefix_rules):
assert type(section) == dict
for rule, outcome_list in section.iteritems():
assert type(rule) == str
if rule[-1] == '*':
_ParseOutcomeList(rule[:-1], outcome_list, variables, prefix_rules)
else:
_ParseOutcomeList(rule, outcome_list, variables, rules)
JS_TEST_PATHS = {
'debugger': [[]],
'inspector': [[]],
'intl': [[]],
'message': [[]],
'mjsunit': [[]],
'mozilla': [['data']],
'test262': [['data', 'test'], ['local-tests', 'test']],
'webkit': [[]],
}
def PresubmitCheck(path):
with open(path) as f:
contents = ReadContent(f.read())
basename = os.path.basename(os.path.dirname(path))
root_prefix = basename + "/"
status = {"success": True}
def _assert(check, message): # Like "assert", but doesn't throw.
if not check:
print("%s: Error: %s" % (path, message))
status["success"] = False
try:
for section in contents:
_assert(type(section) == list, "Section must be a list")
_assert(len(section) == 2, "Section list must have exactly 2 entries")
section = section[1]
_assert(type(section) == dict,
"Second entry of section must be a dictionary")
for rule in section:
_assert(type(rule) == str, "Rule key must be a string")
_assert(not rule.startswith(root_prefix),
"Suite name prefix must not be used in rule keys")
_assert(not rule.endswith('.js'),
".js extension must not be used in rule keys.")
_assert('*' not in rule or (rule.count('*') == 1 and rule[-1] == '*'),
"Only the last character of a rule key can be a wildcard")
if basename in JS_TEST_PATHS and '*' not in rule:
_assert(any(os.path.exists(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(path),
*(paths + [rule + ".js"])))
for paths in JS_TEST_PATHS[basename]),
"missing file for %s test %s" % (basename, rule))
return status["success"]
except Exception as e:
print e
return False