The RegExp replace implementation is a bit of a mess. Here, we first
try to handle parts of RegExp.p.exec, and then call directly into the
raw irregexp code (skipping RegExp.p.exec).
We got parts of this wrong: when lastIndex > string.length and the
regexp instance is sticky, two things should happen. 1. The match
should fail, and 2. lastIndex should be reset to 0. On the fast path,
we did the latter but not the former, instead running exec with a
lastIndex of 0.
This CL omits the irregexp call in this case, and defaults to a failed
match instead.
Bug: chromium:875493
Change-Id: I8c959610d267575e37686076a3fd5dfde322f0ca
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1180889
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55207}
d74a9fd595