v8/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-1262007.js
Patrick Thier 88c0f72927 [turbofan] Fix calling class constructors with spread
Calling class constructors without new is a spec violation and should
raise an exception.
In [1] calling class constructors with spread (without new) was handled
by reducing the node to a call to runtime to raise the exception.
However, arguments of the call have to be evaluated first ([2]).
This CL changes the reduction of JSCallWithSpread/JSCallWithArrayLike to
a no-op in JSCallReducer if the target is a class constructor, delaying
raising of the exception to the call builtin.

[1] https://crrev.com/c/3229369
[2] https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-evaluatecall

Bug: chromium:1262007
Change-Id: I2ef504d4ce6e51d582b5951beb6debb983cefba6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3236348
Commit-Queue: Patrick Thier <pthier@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77492}
2021-10-21 10:14:12 +00:00

17 lines
649 B
JavaScript

// Copyright 2021 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
// Flags: --allow-natives-syntax --opt
function foo(...args) {
class C {}
C(...args);
}
Object.getPrototypeOf([])[Symbol.iterator] = () => {};
%PrepareFunctionForOptimization(foo);
assertThrows(foo, TypeError, 'Result of the Symbol.iterator method is not an object');
assertThrows(foo, TypeError, 'Result of the Symbol.iterator method is not an object');
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(foo);
assertThrows(foo, TypeError, 'Result of the Symbol.iterator method is not an object');