Port 732f394c5d
Original Commit Message:
StaGlobal didn't write the accumulator, but the baseline implementation
assumed that it could preserve the accumulator by taking the return
value of the StoreGlobalIC. This almost always worked, except for
setters on the global object.
Fix this by marking StaGlobal as clobbering the accumulator, same as
StaNamedProperty (StaNamedProperty needs to do this anyway to avoid
inlined setters from needing to create accumulator-preserving frames;
StaGlobal would have needed the same thing if we'd ever inlined setters
for it).
Also, add a new debug scope, EnsureAccumulatorPreservedScope, to the
baseline compiler, which checks if the accumulator value is preserved
across non-accumulator-writing bytecodes. This found a (benign) bug with
ForInPrepare, so fix that too.
R=leszeks@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, junyan@redhat.com, midawson@redhat.com
BUG=
LOG=N
Change-Id: Id8ada05abeb1a9c7e8a16936c35be9d652c4e8b0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3124529
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Fa <mfarazma@redhat.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76537}