86d512c848
We used to calculate hash in completely incorrect way. We use each forth character to calculate hash but we should use each one. R=dgozman@chromium.org Bug: v8:7426 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel Change-Id: Iaaa317bbf3b3ef71632735dfd069db450283b6f4 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/909586 Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#51191}
37 lines
1.4 KiB
JavaScript
37 lines
1.4 KiB
JavaScript
// Copyright 2018 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
let {session, contextGroup, Protocol} =
|
|
InspectorTest.start('Checks hash in Debugger.scriptParsed event');
|
|
|
|
(async function main() {
|
|
Protocol.Debugger.enable();
|
|
|
|
const tests = [{firstScript: '1', secondScript: '2'}];
|
|
for (let length = 1; length <= 10; ++length) {
|
|
for (let differentChar = 0; differentChar < length; ++differentChar) {
|
|
const firstScript = ' '.repeat(differentChar) + '1' +
|
|
' '.repeat(length - differentChar - 1) + ';';
|
|
const secondScript = ' '.repeat(differentChar) + '2' +
|
|
' '.repeat(length - differentChar - 1) + ';';
|
|
tests.push({firstScript, secondScript});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const {firstScript, secondScript} of tests) {
|
|
InspectorTest.log(firstScript);
|
|
const firstScriptParsed = Protocol.Debugger.onceScriptParsed();
|
|
Protocol.Runtime.evaluate({expression: firstScript});
|
|
const hash1 = (await firstScriptParsed).params.hash;
|
|
|
|
InspectorTest.log(secondScript);
|
|
const secondScriptParsed = Protocol.Debugger.onceScriptParsed();
|
|
Protocol.Runtime.evaluate({expression: secondScript});
|
|
const hash2 = (await secondScriptParsed).params.hash;
|
|
|
|
InspectorTest.log(hash1 === hash2 ? 'Error: the same hash!' : 'PASS');
|
|
}
|
|
InspectorTest.completeTest();
|
|
})();
|