v8/test/inspector/cpu-profiler
Jakob Gruber 8c33e289b5 [coverage] Enable optimizations in block coverage modes
Now that function counts are based on dedicated call counters instead
of FeedbackVector::invocation_count, we can enable optimizations for
block coverage modes.

This significantly speeds up V8 with enabled coverage:

Before this CL, the web-tooling-benchmark regressed by 70% (block
count coverage vs. no coverage).  With this CL, the regression is
reduced to 40%.

Bug: v8:6000,v8:9148
Change-Id: I6bb538bd66f32f016c66c1d1996bce3b25958232
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1615241
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61582}
2019-05-16 14:39:19 +00:00
..
console-profile-end-parameterless-crash-expected.txt
console-profile-end-parameterless-crash.js
console-profile-expected.txt
console-profile-wasm-expected.txt Reland "[inspector] Add wasm profiling test" 2019-02-20 12:35:53 +00:00
console-profile-wasm.js Reland "[inspector] Add wasm profiling test" 2019-02-20 12:35:53 +00:00
console-profile.js
coverage-block-expected.txt [coverage] Enable optimizations in block coverage modes 2019-05-16 14:39:19 +00:00
coverage-block.js
coverage-expected.txt [parser] Force func decl allocation for non-block code coverage 2019-02-15 11:49:26 +00:00
coverage.js
enable-disable-expected.txt
enable-disable.js
record-cpu-profile-expected.txt
record-cpu-profile.js
stop-without-preceeding-start-expected.txt
stop-without-preceeding-start.js