Switch to wxCHECK so the bad code isn't still executed if the assert

dialog is ignored.


git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@22811 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
This commit is contained in:
Robin Dunn 2003-08-13 19:45:53 +00:00
parent e71fd398b8
commit 3e13956a1f

View File

@ -3138,23 +3138,25 @@ int wxGridStringTable::GetNumberCols()
wxString wxGridStringTable::GetValue( int row, int col )
{
wxASSERT_MSG( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
_T("invalid row or column index in wxGridStringTable") );
wxCHECK_MSG( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
wxEmptyString,
_T("invalid row or column index in wxGridStringTable") );
return m_data[row][col];
}
void wxGridStringTable::SetValue( int row, int col, const wxString& value )
{
wxASSERT_MSG( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
_T("invalid row or column index in wxGridStringTable") );
wxCHECK_RET( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
_T("invalid row or column index in wxGridStringTable") );
m_data[row][col] = value;
}
bool wxGridStringTable::IsEmptyCell( int row, int col )
{
wxASSERT_MSG( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
wxCHECK_MSG( (row < GetNumberRows()) && (col < GetNumberCols()),
true,
_T("invalid row or column index in wxGridStringTable") );
return (m_data[row][col] == wxEmptyString);
@ -3916,21 +3918,21 @@ bool wxGrid::SetTable( wxGridTableBase *table, bool takeOwnership,
{
if ( m_created )
{
// stop all processing
m_created = FALSE;
// stop all processing
m_created = FALSE;
if (m_ownTable)
{
wxGridTableBase *t=m_table;
m_table=0;
delete t;
delete t;
}
delete m_selection;
m_table=0;
m_selection=0;
m_numRows=0;
m_numCols=0;
delete m_selection;
m_table=0;
m_selection=0;
m_numRows=0;
m_numCols=0;
}
if (table)
{
@ -9339,13 +9341,13 @@ void wxGrid::SetColSize( int col, int width )
// should we check that it's bigger than GetColMinimalWidth(col) here?
// (VZ)
// No, because it is reasonable to assume the library user know's
// what he is doing. However whe should test against the weaker
// what he is doing. However whe should test against the weaker
// constariant of minimalAcceptableWidth, as this breaks rendering
//
//
// This test then fixes sf.net bug #645734
if ( width < GetColMinimalAcceptableWidth()) { return; }
if ( m_colWidths.IsEmpty() )
{
// need to really create the array