fix #803 : wrong example in huffman bitstream section, reported by @ulikunitz
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ecd34ee5e
commit
8b12812147
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Distribution of this document is unlimited.
|
||||
|
||||
### Version
|
||||
|
||||
0.2.5 (31/03/17)
|
||||
0.2.6 (19/08/17)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ The structure of a single Zstandard frame is following:
|
||||
|
||||
| `Magic_Number` | `Frame_Header` |`Data_Block`| [More data blocks] | [`Content_Checksum`] |
|
||||
|:--------------:|:--------------:|:----------:| ------------------ |:--------------------:|
|
||||
| 4 bytes | 2-14 bytes | n bytes | | 0-4 bytes |
|
||||
| 4 bytes | 2-14 bytes | n bytes | | 0-4 bytes |
|
||||
|
||||
__`Magic_Number`__
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1249,23 +1249,25 @@ Consequently, a last byte of `0` is not possible.
|
||||
And the final-bit-flag itself is not part of the useful bitstream.
|
||||
Hence, the last byte contains between 0 and 7 useful bits.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if the literal sequence "0145" was encoded using the prefix codes above,
|
||||
it would be encoded as:
|
||||
```
|
||||
00000001 01110000
|
||||
```
|
||||
Starting from the end,
|
||||
it's possible to read the bitstream in a __little-endian__ fashion,
|
||||
keeping track of already used bits. Since the bitstream is encoded in reverse
|
||||
order, starting from the end read symbols in forward order.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, if the literal sequence "0145" was encoded using above prefix code,
|
||||
it would be encoded (in reverse order) as:
|
||||
|
||||
|Symbol | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | Padding |
|
||||
|--------|------|------|----|---|---------|
|
||||
|Encoding|`0000`|`0001`|`01`|`1`| `10000` |
|
||||
|Encoding|`0000`|`0001`|`01`|`1`| `00001` |
|
||||
|
||||
Starting from the end,
|
||||
it's possible to read the bitstream in a __little-endian__ fashion,
|
||||
keeping track of already used bits. Since the bitstream is encoded in reverse
|
||||
order, by starting at the end the symbols can be read in forward order.
|
||||
Resulting in following 2-bytes bitstream :
|
||||
```
|
||||
00010000 00001101
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reading the last `Max_Number_of_Bits` bits,
|
||||
it's then possible to compare extracted value to decoding table,
|
||||
Reading highest `Max_Number_of_Bits` bits,
|
||||
it's possible to compare extracted value to decoding table,
|
||||
determining the symbol to decode and number of bits to discard.
|
||||
|
||||
The process continues up to reading the required number of symbols per stream.
|
||||
@ -1516,12 +1518,13 @@ to crosscheck that an implementation build its decoding tables correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
Version changes
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
- 0.2.6 : fixed an error in huffman example, by Ulrich Kunitz
|
||||
- 0.2.5 : minor typos and clarifications
|
||||
- 0.2.4 : section restructuring, by Sean Purcell
|
||||
- 0.2.3 : clarified several details, by Sean Purcell
|
||||
- 0.2.2 : added predefined codes, by Johannes Rudolph
|
||||
- 0.2.1 : clarify field names, by Przemyslaw Skibinski
|
||||
- 0.2.0 : numerous format adjustments for zstd v0.8
|
||||
- 0.2.0 : numerous format adjustments for zstd v0.8+
|
||||
- 0.1.2 : limit Huffman tree depth to 11 bits
|
||||
- 0.1.1 : reserved dictID ranges
|
||||
- 0.1.0 : initial release
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user