[*] Formatting: this was bothering me
This commit is contained in:
parent
a36a1b8211
commit
c7fb247f99
@ -33,27 +33,7 @@ namespace Aurora::Processes
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (const auto &open : gOpenItems)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (open.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
// We probably ran out of memory.
|
||||
// AuProcess/Open can safely drop as we expect shells to be kinda fucky and async
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Case in point: Minecraft on Linux (would?) blocks when you click a link in chat
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Fuck tons of applications support clicking of links, in the case of TS and others, allowing for RCE.
|
||||
// In the case of MC and others, they don't even know if the operation blocks until the process closes.
|
||||
// Assuming non-blocking, the API returns false on failure; but if it's blocking, who knows what that
|
||||
// means... Nonzero exit code? Not enough resources? No error?
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Websites, programs, and scripts wouldn't know how to process "missing protocol handler,"
|
||||
// "not enough resources," "process crashed before pump," "shell busy." For the most part, we don't
|
||||
// expect expect the developer to be aware of what happens after a request to open a resource is
|
||||
// requested. It's a lot of engineering effort for what should be fork, exec("start", ...)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Dropping invalid paths, out of memory during UTF8 conversion, and other IO issues is probably fine.
|
||||
// Use an actual IProcess object, if you care about spawning and monitoring executables.
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (open.empty()) continue; // [*1]
|
||||
|
||||
ShellExecuteW(nullptr,
|
||||
AuIOFS::DirExists(open) ? L"explore" : L"open",
|
||||
@ -118,9 +98,32 @@ namespace Aurora::Processes
|
||||
{
|
||||
OpenUri(AuIOFS::NormalizePathRet(file));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Consider creating blocking apis whose return value is an IProcess (construct from ShellExecuteExW -> in.hProcess, or ("xdg-start", ...))
|
||||
// For the most part, blocking for a specific application in the context of a protocol or file open request is a dated computing construct.
|
||||
// Nowdays, opening an editor, mail client, or such like means poking a single executable that'll spawn a fuck ton of background workers, io threads,
|
||||
// and other resources, to manage multiple instances of whatever the application deals with (think: editor tabs; browser windows; sendto: isnt a modal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Consider creating blocking apis whose return value is an IProcess (construct from ShellExecuteExW -> in.hProcess, or ("xdg-start", ...))
|
||||
// For the most part, blocking for a specific application in the context of a protocol or file open request is a dated computing construct.
|
||||
// Nowdays, opening an editor, mail client, or such like means poking a single executable that'll spawn a fuck ton of background workers, io threads,
|
||||
// and other resources, to manage multiple instances of whatever the application deals with (think: editor tabs; browser windows; sendto: isnt a modal)
|
||||
|
||||
// [*1] :
|
||||
// We probably ran out of memory.
|
||||
// AuProcess/Open can safely drop as we expect shells to be kinda fucky and async
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Case in point: Minecraft on Linux (would?) blocks when you click a link in chat
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Fuck tons of applications support clicking of links, in the case of TS and others, allowing for RCE.
|
||||
// In the case of MC and others, they don't even know if the operation blocks until the process closes.
|
||||
// Assuming non-blocking, the API returns false on failure; but if it's blocking, who knows what that
|
||||
// means... Nonzero exit code? Not enough resources? No error?
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Websites, programs, and scripts wouldn't know how to process "missing protocol handler,"
|
||||
// "not enough resources," "process crashed before pump," "shell busy." For the most part, we don't
|
||||
// expect expect the developer to be aware of what happens after a request to open a resource is
|
||||
// requested. It's a lot of engineering effort for what should be fork, exec("start", ...)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Dropping invalid paths, out of memory during UTF8 conversion, and other IO issues is probably fine.
|
||||
// Use an actual IProcess object, if you care about spawning and monitoring executables.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Move the above comments into something less gross
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user