Adds a reduction pass that removes OpDecorate and OpMemberDecorate
instructions that annotate instructions and members with
RelaxedPrecision. As well as being useful in its own right, removing
such references allows other passes to remove further instructions.
Now we need to handle id overflow when we overflow while replacing uses of the variable. While looking at this code, I noticed an error in the way we handle access chains that cannot be replaced because of overflow. Name it will make some change, and then give up by returning SuccessWithoutChange. But it was changed.
This is fixed up by returning Failure if we notice the error at the time of rewriting the users. This is for both id overflow or out-of-bounds accesses.
Code is added to "CheckUses" to remove variables that have out-of-bounds accesses from the candidate list, so we don't even try to rewrite its uses.
Fixes https://crbug.com/995032
If we run out of ids when creating a new variable, sroa does not recognize
the error, and continues doing work. This leads to segmentation faults.
Fixes https://crbug/969655
Fixes#2793
* Don't special case matrix validation compared to other composites
* just check the constituents are constants or undefs
* later checking validates the column type
* new test
We are no able to inline OpKill instructions into a continue construct.
See #2433. However, we have to be able to inline to correctly do
legalization. This commit creates a pass that will wrap OpKill
instructions into a function of its own. That way we are able to inline
the rest of the code.
The follow up to this will be to not inline any function that contains
an OpKill.
Fixes#2726
This also fixes ADCE to not remove possibly needed OpTypeForwardPointer.
The bug, its fix and the corresponding test have a circular dependency
with the extension, so they are packaged together.
If a member of a struct has a relaxed precision, sroa will not split the
struct. This means we do not get all cases. This commit handles these
cases. The other part is that the decoration needs to be passed on to
the new variables.
Fixes#2786
This transformation can introduce an instruction that uses
OpCopyObject to make a copy of some other result id. This change
introduces the transformation, but does not yet introduce a fuzzer
pass to actually apply it.
Fixes#2768
* In scalar replacement, interpret access chain indexes as signed counts
* Use Constant::GetSignExtendedValue and Constant::GetZeroExtendedValue
where appropriate
* new tests
spirv-opt: Add --graphics-robust-access
Clamps access chain indices so they are always
in bounds.
Assumes:
- Logical addressing mode
- No runtime-array-descriptor-indexing
- No variable pointers
Adds stub code for clamping coordinate and samples
for OpImageTexelPointer.
Adds SinglePassRunAndFail optimizer test fixture.
Android.mk: add source/opt/graphics_robust_access_pass.cpp
Adds Constant::GetSignExtendedValue, Constant::GetZeroExtendedValue
This fixes#2608.
The original test case had an out-of-bounds reference that ended up
folding into OpCompositeExtract that was indexing right outside the
constant composite.
The returned constant would then cause a segfault during constant
propagation.
Fixes#2764
* Don't replace all uses when simplifying instructions, instead only
update non-debug, non-decoration uses
* added a test
* Add a new version of RAUW that takes a predicate to decide whether to
replace the use or not
* used in simplification pass
* Fix#2609 - Handle out-of-bounds scalar replacements.
When SROA tries to do a replacement for an OpAccessChain that is exactly
one element out of bounds, the code was trying to access its internal
array of replacements and segfaulting.
This protects the code from doing this, and it additionally fixes the
way SROA works by not returning failure when it refuses to do a
replacement. Instead of failing the optimization pass, SROA will now
simply refuse to do the replacement and keep going.
Additionally, this patch fixes the SROA logic to now return a proper status so we can
correctly state that the pass made no changes to the IR if it only found
invalid references.
The recently added fuzzer_replayer and fuzzer_shrinker tests were
rather heavyweight and were leading to CI timeouts. This change
reduces the runtime of those tests by having them do fewer iterations.
Merge return expects unreachable merge block to look a certain way, and
unreachable continue blocks to look a certain way. What if an
unreachable block is both a merge and a continue? The continue is
suppose to take precedent, but merge-return implements it with the merge
taking precedent. This change flips that around.
Fixes#2746
Similar to the existing 'add dead breaks' pass, this adds a pass to
add dead continues to blocks in loops where such a transformation is
viable. Various functionality common to this new pass and 'add dead
breaks' has been factored into 'fuzzer_util', and some small
improvements to 'add dead breaks' that were identified while reviewing
that code again have been applied.
Fixes#2719.
* Process OpDecorateId in ADCE
When there is an OpDecorateId instruction that is live,
the ids that is references must be kept live. This change
adds them to the worklist.
I've also updated a validator check to allow OpDecorateId
to be able to apply to decoration groups.
Fixes#1759.
* Remove dead code.
In merge return, we need to know the original dominator for a block in order to
traverse code from the original dominator to the new dominator and add
appropriate Phi nodes. The current code gets this wrong because the dominator
tree is build as needed. The first time we get the immediate dominator for a
function we just built the dominator tree and it takes into account that a
block has been split. The second time it does not.
This inconsistency needs to be fixed. We do that by recording the original
dominator for all blocks at the start of the pass.
If we were to record just the basic block, that could change if the block is
split. We want to traverse the code in the body of the original dominator,
whatever block it ends up in. To make this easy to track, we not save the
terminator instruction to represent the original dominator.
Fixes#2745
When a phi candidate is marked as trivial, we are suppose to update all
of its uses to the reference the value that it is being folded to.
However, the code updates the uses misses `defs_at_block_`. So at a
later time, the id for the trivial phi can reemerge.
Fixes#2744
* Bindless Instrument: Make init check depend solely on input_init_enabled
Previously was dependent on presense of descriptor_indexing extension
in SPIR-V, but this missed some cases. Tests updated to refect this new
policy.
* Fix format.
This change refactors all storage class validation for atomics
to reflect the similar refactoring in the specification.
It is currently not possible to write a test for the check
rejecting Generic in an OpenCL 1.2 environment as the required
GenericPointer capability isn't allowed there. I've decided
to keep the check nonetheless to guard against the capability
becoming available without the rules for atomics being updated.
The ID changes in existing tests aren't ideal but introducing
names drags in a substantial refactoring of this file.
Contributes to #2595.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Petit <kevin.petit@arm.com>
* Fix bug in merge return
The merge return pass seems to assume that the only new edges in the cfg
are from return block to merge blocks. However, it is possible that a
merge block branches to a merge block when it did not before.
This change add a new variable to track all of the new edges. It also
renames some other variables and cleans us the code to make it a bit
easier to read.
Fixes#2702.
Dead branch elimination needs to know about the constructs that a block is contained it when determining what to do with its merge instruction. We currently fold branches in block as we see them, which is parent constructs before their children. This causes the struct cfg analysis to crash because it tries to get the parent construct for a block after the parent has been folded.
This can be fixed by folding the branch of the children before the parents.
Fixes#2667.
There are a couple spots where we are not looking at decorations when we should.
1. Value numbering is suppose to assign a different value number to ids if they have different decorations. However that is not being done for OpCopyObject and OpPhi.
1. Instruction simplification is propagating OpCopyObject instruction without checking for decorations. It should only do that if no decorations are being lost.
Add a new function to the decoration manager to check if the decorations of one id are a subset of the decorations of another.
Fixes#2715.
